The reverse-transcriptase inhibitor lamivudine (Zeffix, GlaxoSmithKline) is often used to treat chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) until resistance develops. Treatment may then be switched to the reverse-transcriptase inhibitor adefovir (Hepsera, Gilead), which has a lower frequency of resistance. Here, we describe three cases of primary adefovir resistance that were sensitive to tenofovir (Viread, Gilead). All three cases involved a rare HBV variant with a valine at position 233 of the reverse-transcriptase domain instead of isoleucine (rtI233V), as in the wild-type virus. This HBV variant also displayed resistance to adefovir and sensitivity to tenofovir in vitro.

Five blood donors with occult persistent and one donor with an early window phase HBV infection were identified. They were negative in regular HBsAg screening and had low levels of HBV DNA that were probably not detectable by current mini-pool nucleic acid amplification testing. In four donors several mutations were found located in the HBs antigen loop. In three donors the mutations were predominantly outside the ''a'' determinant; one donor had a wild type HBsAg sequence. Fifty-five recipients of donations from the persistently infected donors could be tested for previous or ongoing HBV infection and of them 53% (29/55) were anti-HBc positive. Based on the prevalence of antiHBc in Germany (7%), it was assumed that four of those recipients had already been positive before transfusion. In 22 cases, it was assumed that they acquired infection by the donations, but the infection remained asymptomatic and was resolved. In three cases transmission was proven by the time course of the acute infection and sequence identity The resulting infection was fatal and associated with immunological disorders at the time of transmission: in one case sepsis and in the other two cases immunosuppression. In a further asymptomatic case of proven transmission from the early window phase donation passively administered anti-HBs could not prevent spread of wildtype HBV but antiviral treatment lead to resolution. Surprisingly the typical acute hepatitis B was not observed in a single one of the 26 cases of assumed or proven transmission.

No abstract

The Taormina Consensus Conference defined ‘occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection’ (OBI) as the ‘presence of HBV DNA in the liver of individuals testing HBsAg-negative with currently available assays’. Most occult is the so-called ‘window period’ after exposure before HBV DNA appears in the blood. We identified two blood donors whose donations tested HBsAg- and HBV DNA-negative, but transmitted HBV. Both subsequently developed HBsAg and acute hepatitis. However, such cases are not considered as true OBI. A true transient OBI remains HBsAg-negative during the entire course. One case of acute OBI showed a peak viremia of 15,000 IU/ml HBV DNA and sub-borderline HBsAg, suggesting a ratio of virions to subviral particles of 1:10, whereas ‘normal’ cases show at peak viremia a ratio of 1:3,000. Blood donors with OBI may transmit HBV. We studied 5 blood donors with OBI and 55 of their recipients. In 22 recipients, transmission was probable, but they remained healthy. However, in 3 recipients, who were immunosuppressed at the time of transfusion, fatal fulminant hepatitis B developed. The majority of anti-HBc-positive healthy individuals have HBV DNA in the liver which may start replication under severe immunosuppression. Nine such cases are described here. OBI or reactivated HBV infections often lead to selection of HBsAg escape mutations as we could show in 11 of 14 cases. Infection of vaccinated individuals favors development of OBI as we observed in 6 blood donors. HB vaccination may solve the problem of overt HBV infection but may favor OBI.

No abstract

A fatal case of human encephalitis has been observed for which our results indicate that Semliki Forest virus (SFV) was the etiologic agent. This is surprising in view of the fact that this virus, which has been widely studied, was believed to be one of the arboviruses nonpathogenic for man. Described are the clinical course, the virological examinations performed, and the histopathological findings in the central nervous system.

Islet cell antibodies were investigated in 127 non-diabetic children after mumps infection and in four out of seven children who developed diabetes mellitus shortly after active mumps vaccination. Twenty-one of the children who had mumps and all four vaccinated children who were tested had islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies. In contrast, islet cell surface antibodies were detected in 43 out of 68 patients with mumps infection and in 32 out of 44 patients with other viral diseases. All but one mumps-infected child and all the other viral infected patients investigated did not develop diabetes mellitus. The mumps-infected ICA positive children did not show those HLA-frequencies associated with Type 1 diabetes.

No abstract