No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

In tissue and organ transplantation, it is of great importance to avoid the transmission of blood-borne viruses to the recipient. While serologic testing for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and -2, anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc), and Treponema pallidum infection is mandatory, there is until now in most countries no explicit demand for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) to detect HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and HCV infection. After a review of reports in the literature on viral transmission events, tissue-specific issues, and manufacturing and inactivation procedures, we evaluated the significance of HIV, HCV, and HBV detection using NAT  in  donors of various types of tissues and compared our results with the experiences of blood banking organizations. There is a significant risk of HIV, HCV, and HBV transmission by musculoskeletal tissues because of their high blood content and the high donor-recipient ratio. If no effective virus inactivation procedure for musculoskeletal tissue is applied, donors should be screened using NAT  for  HIV, HCV, and HBV. Serologically screened cardiovascular tissue carries a very low risk of HIV, HCV, or HBV transmission. Nevertheless, because effective virus inactivation is impossible (retention of tissue morphology) and the donor-recipient ratio may be as high as 1:10, we concluded that NAT  should be performed for HIV, HCV, and HBV as an additional safety measure. Although cornea allografts carry the lowest risk of transmitting HIV, HCV, and HBV  owing to corneal physiology, morphology, and the epidemiology of corneal diseases, NAT  for  HCV should still be performed. If the NAT  screening of a donor for HIV, HCV, and HBV is negative, quarantine storage of the donor tissue seems dispensable. In view of numerous synergistic effects with transfusion medicine, it would be advantageous for tissue banks to cooperate with blood bank laboratories in performing virological tests.

No abstract

To examine the consistency and comparability of anti-hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBcAg) assays, four blood donation centers of the Red Cross in the Federal Republic of Germany tested 4,080 unselected blood donors with six different tests in parallel. Confirmation testing of reactive samples was done in the National Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis. Depending on the test kit used, 4.1 to 9.9% of serum samples were initially positive and 2.9 to 7.5% were repeatedly positive. Sixteen percent of serum samples were positive in at least one test but only three percent were positive in ail six tests. Statistical analysis of frequency distribution of optical densities for each test suggested that there should be a correction of the cutoff values. This reduced the number of false-positive results by half, but a significant proportion of discrepant results could not be resolved. The lack of specificity and consistency requires cautious interpretation of isolated anti-HBcAg results in clinical specimens. Screening of predominantly anti-HBcAg-negative populations (e.g., blood donors) by the current anti-HBcAg test kits will almost necessarily give unsatisfactory results.

Background: Some properties of blood are modified post mortem. These modifications might give false-negative or false-positive results in infectious disease testing. Most CE-marked test equipment for infectious serology testing is not validated for testing post-mortal blood. Validation, however, is obligatory, if the results are used for the release of tissues for transplantation. Methods: Samples of pre- and post-mortem sera were obtained from 20 cornea donors, and the results were compared for anti-HIV-1/2, anti-HCV, HBsAg, and anti-HBc on the Siemens-BEP-III Automatic System. Negative post-mortem sera were spiked with standard sera (PEI anti-HCV IgG, PEI HBsAg ad 1000 standard, anti-HBc IgG (WHO) NIBSC 95/522, PEI anti-HIV-IV) in concentrations which give low- and high-positive results for the respective marker. Results: All pre-mortem sera were negative for all markers. None of the post-mortem samples was false-positive. None of the spiked post-mortem samples was false-negative. Technical errors occurred during the validation process but could be detected and eliminated. Serum samples should be centrifuged immediately after collection, and it must be taken into account that post-mortem serum could rarely lead to blockage of pipetting systems due to clotting phenomena. Conclusion: There is no indication that post-mortem samples give false-negative or false-positve results with the test system and test kits used. The procedure described might serve as a model for validating other test kits on post-mortem samples.

No abstract