Although vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is widely used, therapeutic mechanisms and optimal stimulation parameters remain elusive. In the present study, we investigated the effect of VNS on hippocampal field activity and compared the efficiency of different VNS paradigms. Hippocampal electroencephalography (EEG) and perforant path dentate field-evoked potentials were acquired before and during VNS in freely moving rats, using 2 VNS duty cycles: a rapid cycle (7 s on, 18 s off) and standard cycle (30 s on, 300 s off) and various output currents. VNS modulated the evoked potentials, reduced total power of the hippocampal EEG, and slowed the theta rhythm. In the hippocampal EEG, theta (4-8 Hz) and high gamma (75-150 Hz) activity displayed strong phase amplitude coupling that was reduced by VNS. Rapid-cycle VNS had a greater effect than standard-cycle VNS on all outcome measures. Using rapid cycle VNS, a maximal effect on EEG parameters was found at 300 μA, beyond which effects saturated. The findings suggest that rapid-cycle VNS produces a more robust outcome than standard cycle VNS and support already existing preclinical evidence that relatively low output currents are sufficient to produce changes in brain physiology and thus likely also therapeutic efficacy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a widely used neuromodulation technique that is currently used or being investigated as therapy for a wide array of human diseases such as epilepsy, depression, Alzheimer's disease, tinnitus, inflammatory diseases, pain, heart failure and many others. Here, we report a pronounced decrease in brain and core temperature during VNS in freely moving rats. Two hours of rapid cycle VNS (7s on/18s off) decreased brain temperature by around [Formula: see text]C, while standard cycle VNS (30[Formula: see text]s on/300[Formula: see text]s off) was associated with a decrease of around [Formula: see text]C. Rectal temperature similarly decreased by more than [Formula: see text]C during rapid cycle VNS. The hypothermic effect triggered by VNS was further associated with a vasodilation response in the tail, which reflects an active heat release mechanism. Despite previous evidence indicating an important role of the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system in therapeutic effects of VNS, lesioning this system with the noradrenergic neurotoxin DSP-4 did not attenuate the hypothermic effect. Since body and brain temperature affect most physiological processes, this finding is of substantial importance for interpretation of several previously published VNS studies and for the future direction of research in the field.

Background:Recent experiments in rats have demonstrated significant effects of VNS on hippocampal excitability but were partially attributed to hypothermia, induced by the applied VNS parameters. Objective: To allow meaningful preclinical research on the mechanisms of VNS and translation of rodent results to clinical VNS trials, we aimed to identify non-hypothermia inducing VNS parameters that significantly affect hippocampal excitability. Methods: VNS was administered in cycles of 30 s including either 0.1, 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1.5, 3 or 7 s of VNS ON time (biphasic pulses, 250ms/phase, 1 mA, 30 Hz) and the effect of different VNS ON times on brain temperature was evaluated. VNS paradigms with and without hypothermia were compared for their effects on hippocampal neurophysiology in freely moving rats. Results: Using VNS parameters with an ON time/OFF time of up to 0.5 s/30 s did not cause hypothermia, while clear hypothermia was detected with ON times of 1.5, 3 and 7 s/30 s. Relative to SHAM VNS, the normothermic 0.5 s VNS condition significantly decreased hippocampal EEG power and changed dentate gyrus evoked potentials with an increased field excitatory postsynaptic potential slope and a decreased population spike amplitude. Conclusion: VNS can be administered in freely moving rats without causing hypothermia, while profoundly affecting hippocampal neurophysiology suggestive of reduced excitability of hippocampal neurons despite increased synaptic transmission efficiency.

Aim: Selective chemogenetic modulation of locus coeruleus (LC) neurons would allow dedicated investigation of the role of the LC-NA pathway in brain excitability and disorders such as epilepsy. This study investigated the feasibility of an experimental set-up where chemogenetic modification of the brainstem locus coeruleus NA neurons is aimed at and followed by LC unit activity recording in response to clozapine.Methods: The LC of male Sprague-Dawley rats was injected with 10 nl of adenoassociated viral vector AAV2/7-PRSx8-hM3Dq-mCherry (n = 19, DREADD group) or AAV2/7-PRSx8-eGFP (n = 13, Controls). Three weeks later, LC unit recordings were performed in anesthetized rats. We investigated whether clozapine, a drug known to bind to modified neurons expressing hM3Dq receptors, was able to increase the LC firing rate. Baseline unit activity was recorded followed by subsequent administration of 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg of clozapine in all rats. hM3Dq-mcherry expression levels were investigated using immunofluorescence staining of brainstem slices at the end of the experiment.Results: Unit recordings could be performed in 12 rats and in a total of 12 neurons (DREADDs: n = 7, controls: n = 5). Clozapine 0.01 mg/kg did not affect the mean firing rate of recorded LC-neurons; 0.1 mg/kg induced an increased firing rate, irrespective whether neurons were recorded from DREADD or control rats (p = 0.006). Co-labeling of LC neurons and mCherry-tag showed that 20.6 ± 2.3% LC neurons expressed the hM3Dq receptor. Aspecific expression of hM3Dq-mCherry was also observed in non-LC neurons (26.0 ± 4.1%).Conclusion: LC unit recording is feasible in an experimental set-up following manipulations for DREADD induction. A relatively low transduction efficiency of the used AAV was found. In view of this finding, the effect of injected clozapine on LC-NA could Frontiers in Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.org 1 March 2020 | Volume 14 | Article 162 Stevens et al. Chemogenetics to Investigate LC-NA Pathwaynot be investigated as a reliable outcome parameter for activation of chemogenetically modified LC neurons. The use of AAV2/7, a vector previously applied successfully to target dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, leads to insufficient chemogenetic modification of the LC compared to transduction with AAV2/9.

AIM. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) modulates hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) electrophysiology and induces hypothermia in freely moving rats. This study evaluated whether hippocampal (CA1) electrophysiology is similarly modulated and to what extent this is associated with VNS-induced hypothermia. METHODS. Six freely moving rats received a first 4[Formula: see text]h session of rapid cycling VNS (7[Formula: see text]s on/18[Formula: see text]s off), while CA1 evoked potentials, EEG and core temperature were recorded. In a second 4[Formula: see text]h session, external heating was applied during the 3rd and 4th[Formula: see text]h of VNS counteracting VNS-induced hypothermia. RESULTS. VNS decreased the slope of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP), increased the population spike (PS) amplitude and latency, decreased theta (4–12[Formula: see text]Hz) and gamma (30–100[Formula: see text]Hz) band power and theta peak frequency. Normalizing body temperature during VNS through external heating abolished the effects completely for fEPSP slope, PS latency and gamma band power, partially for theta band power and theta peak frequency and inverted the effect on PS amplitude. CONCLUSIONS. Rapid cycle VNS modulates CA1 electrophysiology similarly to DG, suggesting a wide-spread VNS-induced effect on hippocampal electrophysiology. Normalizing core temperature elucidated that VNS-induced hypothermia directly influences several electrophysiological parameters but also masks a VNS-induced reduction in neuronal excitability.