No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose To evaluate clinical outcomes and radiographic changes in patellofemoral (PF) joint congruity between open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and hybrid closed wedge HTO (HCWHTO). Methods From 2011 to 2013, 36 knees in 31 patients who underwent OWHTO and 21 knees in 17 patients who underwent HCWHTO were evaluated in this retrospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Radiological outcomes including hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral patellar height index (FPHI), preoperative PF osteoarthritis (OA) grade, medial and lateral joint spaces of the PF joint, and congruence angle were measured. Clinical parameters including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were also evaluated. Preoperative and final follow-up values for each procedure were compared in outcome analyses. Results Mean preoperative HKA and the degree of PF-OA were significantly more severe for patients treated with HCWHTO compared with those treated with OWHTO (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001). Mean postoperative FPHI was significantly decreased with proximalization of the patella in HCWHTO (p = 0.01) but showed no significant change in OWHTO (n.s.). Regarding PF joint congruity after HCWHTO, lateral joint space and congruence angle were significantly improved (p = 0.0001, p = 0.005), while medial joint space was not significantly changed (n.s.). After OWHTO, congruence angle showed no significant difference (n.s.), but medial and lateral joint spaces were significantly decreased (p = 0.0001, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in KOOS and OKS between the groups (n.s., n.s.). Conclusions Although degrees of varus knee and PF-OA were more severe in HCWHTO than those in OWHTO, HCWHTO led to improved PF joint congruity, and its mid-term clinical outcomes were equivalent to those of OWHTO. Therefore, in patients with varus knee combined with PF-OA preoperatively, HCWHTO is a more effective treatment than OWHTO. Level of evidenceTherapeutic level III. Keywords Open wedge high tibial osteotomy • Hybrid closed wedge high tibial osteotomy • Patellofemoral joint congruity • Osteoarthritis • Knee * Tetsuro Ishimatsu

Purpose To compare the radiological bone union rate after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW‐HTO) and stabilization using a TomoFix™ plate (Synthes, Oberdorf, Switzerland) in three patient groups. Methods Retrospective analysis of 137 knees that underwent MOW‐HTO between January 2014 and January 2017 was using a TomoFix™ plate. Osteotomy gaps were filled with β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) (group A), left unfilled (group B), and subject to autologous bone graft and β‐TCP (group C). Radiological bone union using simple radiography was determined by a modified version of the Brosset et al. osteotomy filling index. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm score. Statistical analyses using the Chi‐square and ANOVA tests were performed between the groups. Results The mean time for radiological bone union was 8.3 ± 3.1 months in group A, 7.2 ± 3.2 in group B and 3.4 ± 1.5 in group C (p = 0.001). There was statistically significant faster bone union in Group C. If the opening distance was more than 10 mm, group A united in 8.6 ± 3.6 months, group B in 8.8 ± 3.4, and group C in 3.5 ± 1.7 (p = 0.001). IKDC and Lysholm knee scores improved significantly (p = 0.004 for IKDC and 0.001 for Lysholm knee scores) in group C when compared to groups A and B at sixth month follow‐up. At final follow‐up, there was no difference in IKDC and Lysholm knee scores. Less delayed union occurred in group C. Conclusions MOW‐HTO with autologous bone graft and β‐TCP had the fastest radiological bone union and best clinical scores at 6 month follow‐up. Level of evidence Retrospective comparative study, Level III.