Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive and debilitating condition. [1,2] Varus deformity of knee joint increases the risk of progression of medial compartment OA. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well-established surgical technique for individuals with medial OA and varus deformity. [3] The aim is to change the load distribution across the knee from the diseased medial part to the healthy lateral part in order to reduce pain, slow the degenerative process and delay the requirements for total knee replacement. [4] Osteotomy of the proximal tibia is becoming popular as compartmental OA of the knee is increasing in younger patients with malalignment of the joint. Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) on the medial side has been described as an effective surgical procedure in the treatment of medial compartmental OA. [5,6] Prevention of patella alta, easy correction of the deformity and no need for fibular osteotomy are the described advantages of medial sided osteotomy. Grafting the osteotomy site for quicker healing either with biologic resources or bone substitutes Objectives: This study aims to investigate if iliac autogenous graft augmentation in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomies (OWHTOs) is superior to no augmentation in terms of bone healing. Patients and methods: Twenty-five patients (14 males, 11 females; mean age 40.9±4.0 years; range, 33 to 48 years) with medial compartmental osteoarthritis of knee joint who underwent high tibial osteotomy with medial open wedge between January 2016 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Twelve of the operated knees were the right knee. Graft was used in 13 patients (52%). Data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), direction, follow-up period, union, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, pre-and postoperative femoral tibial angles (FTAs) and posterior tibial slopes were evaluated. Results: The mean BMI was 26.4±1.9 (range, 22.0 to 30.0). Only 48% of the patients were smoking. The mean follow-up period was 28.6±5.3 months (range, 24 to 38 months). No statistically significant difference was found between the grafted and nongrafted groups in terms of age, BMI, follow-up time, gender, side and smoking status (p>0.05) There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of pre-and postoperative Lysholm scores, pre-and postoperative IKDC scores, or pre-and postoperative FTA values (p>0.050). Conclusion: Iliac autogenous graft augmentation in medial OWHTO has no effect on union but shortens the union time. Preoperative high varus degree adversely affects union. Therefore, routine use of iliac crest autograft is not recommended.