A pincer type ligand provides an additional coordination site or a proton relay depending on the metal oxidation state.

Most of the systems for photochemical hydrogen production are not stable and suffer from decomposition. With bis(bidentate) tetraphosphane ligands the stability increases enormously, up to more than 1000 h. This stability was achieved with a system containing osmium(ii) as a light harvesting antenna and palladium(ii) as a water reduction catalyst connected with a bis(bidentate) phosphane ligand in one molecule with the chemical formula [Os(bpy)(dppcb)Pd(dppm)](PF). With the help of electrochemical measurements as well as photophysical data and its single crystal X-ray structure, the electron transfer between the two active metal centres (light harvesting antenna, water reduction catalyst) was analysed. The distance between the two active metal centres was determined to be 7.396(1) Å. In a noble metal free combination of a copper based photosensitiser and a cobalt diimine-dioxime complex as water reduction catalyst a further stabilisation effect by the phosphane ligands is observed. With the help of triethylamine as a sacrificial donor in the presence of different monophosphane ligands it was possible to produce hydrogen with a turnover number of 1176. This completely novel combination is also able to produce hydrogen in a wide pH-range from pH = 7.0 to 12.5 with the maximum production at pH = 11.0. The influence of monophosphane ligands with different Tolman cone angles was investigated. Monophosphane ligands with a large Tolman cone angle (>160°) could not stabilise the intermediate of the cobalt based water reduction catalyst and so the turnover number is lower than for systems with an addition of monophosphane ligands with a Tolman cone angle smaller than 160°. The role of the monophosphane ligand during sunlight-induced hydrogen production was analysed and these results were confirmed with DFT calculations. Furthermore the crystal structures of two important Co(i) intermediates, which are the catalytic active species during the catalytic pathway, were obtained. The exchange of PPh with other tertiary phosphane ligands can have a major impact on the activity, depending on the coordination properties. By an exchange of monophosphane ligands with functionalised phosphane ligands (hybrid ligands) the hydrogen production was raised 2.17 times.

Coordination complex systems containing phosphine ligands are used in artificial photosynthesis utilizing their unique stereoelectronic properties. Mono-, di- and tetraphosphines act as optimized ligand systems for complexation.

Pd@(BiPy‐PEG‐OMe) is a catalyst comprised of palladium nanoparticles (Pd‐NPs) stabilized and made water soluble by 2,2′‐bipyridine‐end‐functionalized polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether (BiPy‐PEG‐OMe). The catalyst has been used in the past for nitrile hydrogenation. In this work, we prove that it is also very active for photocatalytic hydrogen generation, which might be true for more catalysts of its kind and therefore worthy of further investigation. Using the inexpensive photosensitizer Eosin Y, high turnover numbers (TONs) of over 4 500 were achieved for the evolution of molecular hydrogen from pure water under visible‐light irradiation. Replacing Eosin Y, which showed only a short lifetime under experimental conditions (i.e. a few hours), by a novel osmium‐based metal complex, which is also characterized by its crystal structure, the longevity of the system can be boosted to over one and a half months with a maximum TON of 1 500. Combining excellent yield and stability is a clear goal for further research.

Artificial photosynthesis with respect to water splitting is usually divided into water oxidation catalysis (WOC) and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Though in the combined redox dissociation of water into oxygen and hydrogen no protons and electrons occur, both half reactions show photoinduced proton coupled electron transfer (PCET). Regarding a classical approach, photosensitizers (PS) deliver electrons and protons that are accepted by water reduction catalysts (WRC) containing suitable basic atoms like nitrogen working as proton relays. However, the mechanisms of PCET reactions differ, where concerted proton electron transfer (CPET) is an elementary step. In CPET simultaneous electron and proton transfer occurs in the femtoseconds range, being rapid when compared to the periods for coupled vibrations and solvent modes. This has to be distinguished from stepwise electron and proton transfer, leading to underlying thermodynamics of the intermediates. DFT calculations based on X‐ray diffraction (XRD) data help to specify the different reaction pathways. A plethora of experimental procedures are used in order to verify the theoretical predictions. Among them femtosecond pump‐probe spectroscopic measurements play an important role. Furthermore, cyclic voltammetry (CV) has proven to be also a powerful tool. In the case of electrochemical PCET rotating‐disk electrode voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and spectroelectrochemistry complete the experimental tools. In this minireview a selection of examples, where PCET occurs is discussed with respect to possible mechanisms and used methods.

Several PNP‐type ligands of the form bis(dianisylphosphanylmethyl)alkylamine, where alkyl is methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, and benzyl (1–4), have been coordinated to Co(II), Ni(II), Pd(II), and Pt(II) (5–26). This series of water reduction catalysts (WRC) has been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis, multinuclear and 2D NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and a computational study. Intramolecular contact approaches show differences depending on hetero‐ or homoleptic complexes. Both solid state and solution structures indicate an enhancement of steric pressure for the latter. As a consequence CH/M as well as CH/π interactions appear in the X‐ray structures and 1H NMR spectra. They can also be clearly identified by quantum mechanical calculations on a B3LYP level. Since these WRC contain proton relays due to the used PNP‐ligands, they are prone to proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) during photocatalysis. The different steric pressure influences their reorganisation energy. Obviously, the observed intramolecular contact approaches should be regarded as a tool for the design of future WRC.

No abstract

No abstract