Patients and methodsPlasma prolactin was estimated following thirty-six seizures in thirty-five patients. All patients were in-patients at the time of the study. They were divided into three groups:-(a) Generalised seizures. There were eighteen patients [ten male, eight female: mean age

A multicenter, randomized double-blind study of 6 months' duration was performed in 540 patients (average age 54 years, 57% male) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension to determine the relative effects on quality of life of cilazapril, atenolol, and nifedipine retard. Quality of life was assessed by using both a self-administered and an interviewer-administered questionnaire; the assessment included a complaint score (symptoms checklist), Health Status Index, assessment of work satisfaction, Psychological General Well-being Index, Profile of Mood States subscales, and life satisfaction assessment Psychomotor function was measured by the Reitan Trail Making test B. At the end of the trial, diastolic blood pressure had fallen by an average of 15 mm Hg in all three groups, but significantly (p=0.01) more patients taking cilazapril required the addition of a diuretic (36%) compared with those taking atenolol (25%) or nifedipine retard (24%). No significant differences in quality of life were observed between cilazapril and atenolol during the trial. Symptomatic complaints increased on nifedipine retard (p=0.02) and contributed to a higher discontinuation rate (21% discontinued treatment compared with 13% and 14% taking atenolol and cilazapril, respectively,/?=0.04). However, a possible improvement in the fatigue subscale (p=0.04) was also observed on nifedipine retard. The 95% confidence intervals showed that none of the drugs in this trial produced an effect equivalent to that previously reported between captopril and methyldopa in the Psychological General Well Being Index or between captopril and methyldopa or propranolol in Trail Making test B. We conclude that cilazapril and atenolol have equivalent effects on quality of life, but nifedipine retard was associated with more symptomatic complaints and a higher discontinuation rate. (Hypertension 1992; 19:499-507) KEYWORDS • quality of life • antihypertensive therapy • angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors • calcium channel blockers • 0-blockers

Calcium channel blockers are now widely used and there have been case reports of hyperglycemia with nifedipine. In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of the effects of 4 weeks of therapy, each with two dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker drugs, nifedipine and nicardipine, glucose tolerance, plasma insulin levels, and hemoglobin A1 were assessed in 20 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (mean age 59 years). There was no significant difference in glucose tolerance on active therapy (AUC: control, 548.3 +/- 24.8; nifedipine, 559.3 +/- 41.0; and nicardipine, 589.3 +/- 40.3). Similarly, despite producing significant hemodynamic effects, these drugs produced no significant effect on plasma insulin and hemoglobin A1 levels. Calcium channel blocker drugs may be useful alternatives to thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers in the treatment of ischemic heart disease and hypertension, especially in patients with diabetes.

We examined the plasma protein binding of an acidic drug (warfarin bound to albumin) and a basic drug [lidocaine (lignocaine) bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein] in 15 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 15 matched controls. We also examined protein binding of warfarin and lidocaine in 30 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) and 25 controls. Compared with control, the binding of both warfarin (98.81 +/- 0.02 vs 98.57 +/- 0.03%, mean +/- SEM) and of lidocaine (69 +/- 2 vs 58 +/- 2%) was significantly reduced in IDDM. This group had lower concentrations of both albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), achieving statistical significance vs control for albumin only. In the patients with NIDDM, who had a similar level of glycosylated haemoglobin, while there was no significant difference in the binding of lidocaine there was a significant increase in warfarin binding compared with the control population (99.01 +/- 0.03 vs 98.82 +/- 0.04%). This study suggests that binding of both acidic and basic drugs is altered in both IDDM and NIDDM.