1993
DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199324020-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Protein Binding of Lidocaine and Warfarin in Insulin-Dependent and Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: We examined the plasma protein binding of an acidic drug (warfarin bound to albumin) and a basic drug [lidocaine (lignocaine) bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein] in 15 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 15 matched controls. We also examined protein binding of warfarin and lidocaine in 30 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) and 25 controls. Compared with control, the binding of both warfarin (98.81 +/- 0.02 vs 98.57 +/- 0.03%, mean +/- SEM) and of lidocaine (69 +/- 2 v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 The independent and strong risk of diabetics for INR control below the therapeutic range has been discussed earlier and may be mediated by the influence of insulin-and noninsulindependent diabetes on plasma protein binding of acidic drugs, such as VKA. 28 As reported previously by others, diabetes was independently associated with poorer anticoagulation control and outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation. 29,30 The present study, however, extends this knowledge to a real-world sample which is unselected for the indication for OAC therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…26,27 The independent and strong risk of diabetics for INR control below the therapeutic range has been discussed earlier and may be mediated by the influence of insulin-and noninsulindependent diabetes on plasma protein binding of acidic drugs, such as VKA. 28 As reported previously by others, diabetes was independently associated with poorer anticoagulation control and outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation. 29,30 The present study, however, extends this knowledge to a real-world sample which is unselected for the indication for OAC therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The inconsistency observed on fraction unbound of (+)‐M1 when comparing T1DM and T2DM was also observed for both acidic and basic drugs in previous studies described in the literature. The fraction unbound of lidocaine and warfarin was increased in patients with T1DM compared with nondiabetics, but not in patients with T2DM [40]. Thus, in addition to the nonenzymatic glycation of plasma proteins, the influence of diabetes on fraction unbound seems to be due to the lower levels of albumin and α 1 ‐acid glycoprotein in T1DM but not in T2DM, when compared with nondiabetic patients [40]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since the degree of glycosylation is a measure of the exposure of the protein to sustained glucose concentrations, glycosylated haemoglobin is used as an index of diabetic controL Several authors have reported correlations between the degree of glycosylation and serum drug binding. Mereish and co-workers (1982) (1984) 7.6 ± 1.6d Gatti et al (1987) 1.43 ± 0.3d Barry et al (1986) 1.0 ± 0.03 O'Byrne et al (1988) tions, and found that the binding of salicylate decreased with glycosylation. They point out, however, that the glycosylated fraction comprises a relatively small proportion of total albumin and even at 25 to 30% glycosylation (the highest values generally seen in diabetic patients), there was no significant decrease in the salicylate binding capacity.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One further point of interest found in table II is the difference in the binding of warfarin and lidocaine (lignocaine) between patients with 100M and those with NIDOM (Barry et al 1986;O'Byrne et al 1988). In the former group, the binding of lidocaine and warfarin decreased by 37 and 20%, respectively, whereas in the latter group no change in binding was observed.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%