Human—caused fragmentation of forests is increasing, yet the consequences of these landscape changes to vertebrate communities are poorly understood. Although bird community response to forest fragmentation caused by agricultural or urban development has been well studied, we have little understanding of these dynamics in landscapes undergoing intensive forest management, where late—seral forest stands are separated by younger forest stands of varying ages and are part of a spatially and temporally dynamic forest landscape. We investigated the relationship between landscape structure and breeding bird abundance in the central Oregon Coast Range. We sampled vegetation and birds in 30 landscapes (250—300 ha) distributed equally among three basins. Landscapes represented a range in structure based on the proportion of the landscape in a late—seral forest condition and the spatial configuration of that forest condition within the landscape. We computed a variety of landscape metrics from digital vegetation cover maps for each landscape. Using analysis of variance and regression procedures, we quantified the independent effects of habitat area and configuration on 15 bird species associated with late—seral forest. Species varied dramatically in the strength and nature of the relationship between abundance and several gradients in habitat area and configuration at the landscape scale. Landscape structure (composition and configuration) typically explained <50% of the variation in each species' abundance among the landscapes. Species' abundances were generally greater in the more heterogenous landscapes; that is, they were associated with the more fragmented distribution of habitat. Only Winter Wrens showed evidence of association with the least fragmented landscapes. These results must be interpreted within the scope and limitations of our study. In particular, the scale of our analysis was constrained by the lower and upper limits of resolution in our landscapes, as set by minimum patch size and landscape extent, respectively. Thus, our results do not preclude much stronger and different relationships at finer and/or coarser scales. In addition, our community—centered habitat classification scheme and artificially discrete representation of patch boundaries may not have captured the functionally meaningful heterogeneity for each species. Finally, our analysis was limited to relatively common and widespread diurnal breeding bird species. Species sensitive to habitat fragmentation at the scale of our analysis may have been rare already and therefore not subject to the parametrical statistical approach that we employed.

Ecologists have advocated retaining various densities of canopy trees in harvest units in Pacific Northwest forests. In contrast to clear‐cutting, this practice may better emulate the patterns of disturbance and structural complexity typical of natural forests in the region. Several ecological attributes, including vertebrate habitat diversity, are thought to be associated with stands of complex structure. The goal of this study was to determine bird abundance in canopy retention sites relative to other common stand types in the Pacific Northwest and to develop habitat functions for extrapolating bird abundance across current and future landscapes. We used data from five previous studies in the west central Cascades of Oregon to compare bird abundance and to develop habitat functions for forest birds across a wide range of natural and managed stand structures and ages. The 67 stands included clearcuts, retention sites, young closed‐canopy plantations, mature stands, and old‐growth stands. ANOVA revealed that 18 of the 23 species included in the analysis differed significantly in abundance among the stand types, with some species being primarily associated with each of the stand types. The habitat variables used to build habitat functions included tree density by size class, mean tree diameter, and variation in tree diameter. Linear, polynomial, and various nonlinear regression models were evaluated for each bird species. Significant habitat functions were generated for 17 of the 23 bird species. The analyses identified four habitat‐use guilds among the 17 bird species: open‐canopy; open‐canopy with dispersed large trees; structurally complex closed‐canopy; and structurally simple closed‐canopy guilds. This study is the first in the Pacific Northwest to compare bird abundances across natural stands, traditionally managed plantations, and stands managed under ecological forestry approaches. The results suggested that canopy tree retention benefits many, but not all, of the bird species we studied, Moreover, the nonlinear responses of bird abundance revealed thresholds in tree density at which bird abundance changed dramatically. Knowledge of these thresholds allow managers to design stands for specific biodiversity objectives. The habitat functions presented here can be used to predict bird abundance based on habitat measurements derived from field data, remotely sensed data, or output from computer models of forest dynamics.

Mapping of biodiversity elements to expose gaps in conservation networks has become a common strategy in nature-reserve design. We review a set of critical assumptions and issues that influence the interpretation and implementation of gap analysis, including: (1) the assumption that a subset of taxa can be used to indicate overall diversity patterns, and (2) the impact of uncertainty and error propagation in reserve design. We focus our review on species diversity patterns and use data from peer-reviewed literature or extant state-level databases to test specific predictions implied by these assumptions. Support for the biodiversity indicator assumption was varied. Patterns of diversity as reflected in species counts, coincidence of hot spots, and representativeness were not generally concordant among different taxa, with the degree of concordance depending on the measure of diversity used, the taxa examined, and the scale of analysis. Simulated errors in predicting the occurrence of individual species indicated that substantial differences in reserve-boundary recommendations could occur when uncertainty is incorporated into the analysis. Furthermore, focusing exclusively on vegetation and species distribution patterns in conservation planning will contribute to reserve-design uncertainty unless the processes behind the patterns are understood. To deal with these issues, reserve planners should base reserve design on the best available, albeit incomplete, data; should attempt to define those ecological circumstances when the indicator assumption is defensible; should incorporate uncertainty explicitly in mapped displays of biodiversity elements; and should simultaneously consider pattern and process in reserve-design problems.

New silivicultural strategies to sustain both ecological and human communities are being developed and implemented on federal forest lands in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) United States. Two important stand‐level components of the new silviculture regimes are rotation age and retention level of live trees in harvest units. Ecologists have suggested that canopy tree retention and longer rotations will create patterns of stand structure in managed forest that are similar to those in natural forests, and promote long‐term ecological productivity and biodiversity. Forest economists, however, are concerned that canopy tree retention and long rotations may reduce wood production, although the high value of large logs produced by these new silvicultural regime may compensate for reduced growth rates. We used the forest model ZELIG to perform a factorial simulation experiment on long‐term responses of ecological and economic variables to nine retention levels and four rotation lengths. ZELIG output on forest structure and composition was input to a forest economics model that calculated net value of wood products in 1989 dollars. The simulated stand data were also linked with regression equations to predict the densities of 17 bird species as a function of tree size class distribution. Five replicates of each treatment were run for the 240‐yr simulation period. Results indicated that stand structure under each of the canopy tree retention levels was more similar to the pre‐treatment natural forest than following clear‐cutting. Variation in tree size under intermediate levels of retention, however, did not reach the level of the natural forest during the simulation period. Tree species composition was strongly related to retention level and rotation age. Shade‐intolerant Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) lost dominance to shade‐tolerant species under intermediate retention levels and longer rotations. Wood production decreased significantly with increasing retention level and rotation age, with a notable threshold between retention levels of 0 and 5 trees per hectare. Net wood products value did not decrease as rapidly with retention level, and did not differ much among rotation ages, because of the high value of large logs. Bird species responded individualistically to retention level and rotation age. Some had peak densities under short‐rotation clear‐cutting, but most were associated with structurally complex, closed‐canopy forest. Consequently, bird species richness increased significantly with retention level and rotation age. Within the assumptions and limitations of our models, this application provided knowledge on trends and thresholds that can help land managers to choose silvicultural regimes that best balance their management objectives. We concluded that retention level and rotation age strongly influence ecological and economic responses in PNW forests; efforts are needed to reduce uncertainty about these effects.

No abstract