No abstract

No abstract

Field records from 15 herds involved in the Angus Herd Improvement Records program of the American Angus Association indicated that positive assortative mating for weaning weight estimated breeding value (EBV) was being practiced. For each dam, a separate EBV was calculated from information on each progeny with all other progeny data deleted. Individual, paternal and maternal half-sib data available in all years were included in each calculation and thus, were held constant. Bias in cow EBV caused by nonrandom mating was measured as the pooled within dam regression of dam EBV on progeny's sire EBV deviated from the contemporary site average EBV. Across herds, the average estimated bias associated with positive assortative mating ranged from .05 to .08 ratio units.

Genetic trends for weaning weight were evaluated in 15 purebred herds in the United States participating in the Angus Herd Improvement. Records production testing program. Regression techniques were used for separate estimates of sire and dam contributions that were summed to estimate total herd trend. Sire contributions, calculated as the pooled within sire regression of weaning weight ratio on year of calf birth, ranged from .01 +/- .23 to 1.30 +/- .24 across the herds and average .51 ratio units/yr. Dam contributions, estimated as the pooled within dam regression of offspring weaning weight ratio, deviated from the contemporary paternal half-sib average ratio, on year of calf birth, ranged from .06 +/- .06 to .68 +/- .11 and averaged .34 ratio units/yr. A positive trend in direct effects was associated with a possible negative trend in maternal effects. The annual trend within herds ranged from .21 to 1.50 ratio units and averaged .85 units over all herds, representing 1.8 kg annual genetic gain in weaning weight.

Field records (53,989) from the American Angus Association were used to evaluate the impact of bias associated with genetic trend in estimated breeding values for weaning weight. Annual estimates of breeding values were calculated using the reported weaning weight ratios and ratios adjusted for estimated genetic trend. Genetic gains were assumed to be consistently linear. Bias was estimated as the difference between the two estimates, and herd averages across years for dam's bias ranged from .38 to 3.86 ratio units. The bias was a function of the magnitude of the estimated trend and the generation interval. The impact of this bias was small in young cows, but increased rapidly after diet fourth or fifth calves. When annual genetic trend was less than .75 ratio units, the loss in selection response (based upon selecting the top 10 and 50% of males and females, respectively) did not exceed 2.5%. In herds with trends between .75 and 1.1 units/yr, the loss was 6 to 8%. In the five herds where estimated trend exceeded 1.1 units/yr, the loss ranged from 10.8 to 25.2%).