Key Message Increased efficiencies achieved in different steps of DH line production offer greater benefits to maize breeding programs. Abstract Doubled haploid (DH) technology has become an integral part of many commercial maize breeding programs as DH lines offer several economic, logistic and genetic benefits over conventional inbred lines. Further, new advances in DH technology continue to improve the efficiency of DH line development and fuel its increased adoption in breeding programs worldwide. The established method for maize DH production covered in this review involves in vivo induction of maternal haploids by a male haploid inducer genotype, identification of haploids from diploids at the seed or seedling stage, chromosome doubling of haploid (D 0) seedlings and finally, selfing of fertile D 0 plants. Development of haploid inducers with high haploid induction rates and adaptation to different target environments have facilitated increased adoption of DH technology in the tropics. New marker systems for haploid identification, such as the red root marker and high oil marker, are being increasingly integrated into new haploid inducers and have the potential to make DH technology accessible in germplasm such as some Flint, landrace, or tropical material, where the standard R1-nj marker is inhibited. Automation holds great promise to further reduce the cost and time in haploid identification. Increasing success rates in chromosome doubling protocols and/or reducing environmental and human toxicity of chromosome doubling protocols, including research on genetic improvement in spontaneous chromosome doubling, have the potential to greatly reduce the production costs per DH line.

In vivo production of doubled‐haploid (DH) lines in maize (Zea mays L.) routinely involves artificial chromosome doubling by colchicine treatment of seedlings. Because colchicine is a hazardous chemical, replacing it by less‐toxic alternatives would be highly desirable. Our objectives were to (i) test the efficacy of various herbicides alone or in combination with other herbicides or phytohormones as chromosome doubling agents, (ii) evaluate the efficacy of application of these chemicals for different durations and methods of delivery to meristems, and (iii) compare colchicine treatment with the most promising alternative treatment under economic aspects. Several antimitotic herbicides with different modes of action and two phytohormones were tested in various combinations and concentrations in four experiments for survival rate (SR) of germinated seedlings, reproduction rate (RR) measured as the proportion of D0 plants with seed set, and overall success rate (OSR) measured as the proportion of D1 ears with seed set obtained from the germinated seedlings. Amiprophos‐methyl (APM) and pronamid, applied with the seedling soaking method, outperformed all other alternative treatments tested and reached almost the same OSR as colchicine. Cost comparison between the best treatment, containing APM and pronamid, and the colchicine control showed that the total production cost per D0 plant with seed set was about 10% higher than for colchicine as a result of slightly lower OSR. In conclusion, APM combined in an optimum dosage with pronamid is a promising alternative to colchicine in view of the lower toxicity and similar rate of chromosome doubling in maize.

No abstract

No abstract

Key messageAmong the qhir11 and qhir12 sub-regions of a major QTL qhir1, only qhir11 has significant effect on maternal haploid induction, segregation distortion and kernel abortion.AbstractIn vivo haploid induction in maize can be triggered in high frequencies by pollination with special genetic stocks called haploid inducers. Several genetic studies with segregating populations from non-inducer x inducer crosses identified a major QTL, qhir1, on chromosome 1.04 contributing to in vivo haploid induction. A recent Genome Wide Association Study using 51 inducers and 1482 non-inducers also identified two sub-regions within the qhir1 QTL region, named qhir11 and qhir12; qhir12 was proposed to be mandatory for haploid induction because the haplotype of qhir11 was also present in some non-inducers and putative candidate genes coding for DNA and amino acid binding proteins were identified in the qhir12 region. To characterize the effects of each sub-region of qhir1 on haploid induction rate, F2 recombinants segregating for one of the sub-regions and fixed for the other were identified in a cross between CML269 (non-inducer) and a tropicalized haploid inducer TAIL8. To quantify the haploid induction effects of qhir11 and qhir12, selfed progenies of recombinants between these sub-regions were genotyped. F3 plants homozygous for qhir11 and/or qhir12 were identified, and crossed to a ligueless tester to determine their haploid induction rates. The study revealed that only the qhir11 sub-region has a significant effect on haploid induction ability, besides causing significant segregation distortion and kernel abortion, traits that are strongly associated with maternal haploid induction. The results presented in this study can guide fine mapping efforts of qhir1 and in developing new inducers efficiently using marker assisted selection.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00122-017-2873-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.