Ever since coming under colonial rule, Africans in South Africa have operated informal courts which the state courts have not recognized. Using fieldwork data, we contrast two such nonstate judicial structures in Cape Town. We describe the street committees, constituted by the older generation as a subsidiary form of local government coexisting uncomfortably alongside formal apartheid authorities. We then show the explosive consequences of the development from 1985 of youth-run people's courts, which attempted to redefine community values. We conclude with a discussion of our findings in the context of existing theoretical work on informal justice and draw some tentative conclusions on possible developments in a post-apartheid era.

Summaries Reform of policing in South Africa forms a critical part of the transition from white minority, authoritarian rule to a more democratic system that reflects the aspirations of the majority African communities. The article focuses on two kinds of community policing that have developed since the end of apartheid: official partnerships between the state police and local residents, as exemplified in the Community Policing Forums, and ‘community‐initiated policing’ based on local collective organisations (vigilantism), semi‐political groupings and private associations. The official police‐community partnerships have achieved some success in increasing mutual understanding, ‘de‐demonising’ their perceptions of each other and putting respect for human rights on the agenda. Ultimately, however, the pressures of rising crime and the internal upheavals experienced by the police during the transition have forced the police back into their more traditional crime‐fighting mode, in which the community is seen simply as an aid to intelligence gathering — the ‘eyes and ears’ of the police. The South African state continues to flirt with private‐ and community‐based vigilantism, motivated by its overriding concern to ‘do something’ about the bad image created internationally by the crime wave. But there are considerable dangers in this strategy if it does not attempt to bring these organisations within a more law‐abiding way of operating. These issues are so politically sensitive that they can only be understood within the overall regime context.

No abstract

No abstract

Zur Berichterstattung über Rechtsextremismus in der deutschen Presse j 1. Vorurteile über Rechtsextremismus und die Berichterstattung darüber \ Jedes Thema, das die Massenmedien behandeln, wird unter Vorurteilsperspektiven gesehen. | Aber es gibt wohl wenige Themen, die so schwerwiegend vorurteilsbelastend sind wie der \ Rechtsextremismus in Deutschland. Auf die Frage seiner Sp/££