In summary, OLIF is a relatively safe and very effective technique for minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Nonetheless, it should be noted that OLIF carries the risk of complications, especially in the early stage of development.

Objective To compare the clinical and radiological outcome between the modified Broström repair with augmentation using suture tape (MBA) and the modified Broström repair (MB) for patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. Methods A retrospective study was performed in Ningbo No. 6 Hospital. The study included 53 patients who underwent surgical treatment from March 2014 to July 2016 and were followed for 2 years. A total of 25 patients underwent modified Broström repair with augmentation using suture tape, and 28 patients were treated with modified Broström repair. Patients were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Scale (AOFAS) hindfoot scale, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) score, range of motion (ROM), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). The talar tilt angle (TTA) and anterior talar translation (ATT) were used to evaluate the mechanical stability. All radiological outcomes were measured by two orthopaedic surgeons, with the measurements repeated 3 days later. Results The mean age of the patients was 26.6 ± 17.8 years in the MBA group and 28.1 ± 19.4 years in the MB group, and no statistical difference in preoperative data was found between two groups. There were significant differences before and after the operation within the groups. Both groups achieved satisfactory outcomes, and significant improvements (VAS, FAAM, AOFAS, TTA, and ATT) were observed between the 1‐year follow‐up and final follow‐up ( P < 0.05). The MBA group showed significant improvement in the FAAM Sport (87.1 ± 5.4 vs 78.2 ± 12.0, P = 0.001) and total scores (93.1 ± 2.3 vs 90.5 ± 5.1, P = 0.027) at the final follow‐up compared with the MB group, and for the other outcomes, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion The modified Broström repair with augmentation using suture tap for chronic lateral ankle instability achieves a better outcome; however, further research is necessary.

Study design A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate anterior plate fixation of unstable atlas fractures using a transoral approach. Objective To further investigate the safety and efficacy of this surgical technique, as there is currently a paucity of available data. Summary of background data While most atlas fractures can be managed by external immobilization with favorable results, surgery is usually preferable in highly unstable cases. Surgical stabilization is most commonly achieved using a posterior approach with fixation of C1-C2 or C0-C2, but these techniques usually result in loss of joint function and cannot fully stabilize anterior arch fractures of the atlas. Although a transoral approach circumvents these issues, only nine cases were described in the literature to our knowledge. Methods Twenty patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated with this technique during a 6-year period. Screw and plate placement, bone fusion, and integrity of spinal cord and vertebral arteries were assessed via intraoperative and follow-up imaging. Neurologic function, range of motion, strength, pain levels, and signs of infection were assessed clinically upon follow-up.Results There were no incidents of screw loosening or breakage, plate displacement, spinal cord injury, or vertebral artery injury. A total of 20 plates were placed and all 40 screws were inserted into the atlas lateral masses. CT scans demonstrated that two screws were placed too close to the vertebral artery canal, but without clinical consequences. Imaging demonstrated that bone fusion was achieved in all cases by 6 months postoperatively, without intervertebral instability. No plate-related complications were observed in any patients during the follow-up period. Conclusions C1 anterior plate fixation using a transoral approach appears to be a safe, reliable, and function-preserving surgical method for the management of unstable atlas fractures. For this type of fracture, a transoral approach with anterior fixation should be considered as an alternative to posterior approaches or conservative treatments.

C2-C3 posterior short-segment fixation and fusion is an effective method for the management of unstable Hangman's fracture, proving its value as a technique for achieving solid bony fusion combined with a low rate of complications.

Background:Majority of C1 fractures can be effectively treated conservatively by immobilization or traction unless there is an injury to the transverse ligament. Conservative treatment usually involves a long period of immobilization in a halo-vest. Surgical intervention generally involves fusion, eliminating the motion of the upper cervical spine. We describe the treatment of unstable Jefferson fractures designed to avoid these problems of both conservative and invasive methods.Materials and Methods:A retrospective review of 12 patients with unstable Jefferson fractures treated with transoral osteosynthesis of C1 between July 2008 and December 2011 was performed. A steel plate and C1 lateral mass screw fixation were used to repair the unstable Jefferson fractures. Our study group included eight males and four females with an average age of 33 years (range 23-62 years).Results:Patients were followed up for an average of 16 months after surgery. Range of motion of the cervical spine was by and large physiologic: Average flexion 35° (range 28-40°), average extension 42° (range 30-48°). Lateral bending to the right and left averaged 30° and 28° respectively (range 12-36° and 14-32° respectively). The average postoperative rotation of the atlantoaxial joint, evaluated by functional computed tomography scan was 60° (range 35-72°). Total average lateral displacement of the lateral masses was 7.0 mm before surgery (range 5-12 mm), which improved to 3.5 mm after surgery (range 1-6.5 mm). The total average difference of the atlanto-dens interval in flexion and extension after surgery was 1.0 mm (range 1-3 mm).Conclusions:Transoral osteosynthesis of the anterior ring using C1 lateral mass screws is a viable option for treating unstable Jefferson fractures, which allows maintenance of rotation at the C1-C2 joint and restoration of congruency of the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints.

C1 posterior limited construct is a valid technique and a feasible method for treating unstable Jefferson fractures, which allows preservation of the function of the craniocervical junction, without significant morbidity.

Most patients with an extension teardrop fracture of the axis can be treated conservatively. On the basis of this case series, the authors suggest that large fragment size, displacement or angulation, intervertebral disk injury, neurologic deficit, or signs of instability are reasonable indications for surgical treatment.

Vertebral artery is in the medial part of transverse foramen. There is a relative "abundance space" for vertebral artery in transverse foramen.