No abstract

Although the pubertal surge of estrogen is the immediate stimulus to mammary development, the action of estrogen depends upon the presence of pituitary growth hormone and the ability of GH to stimulate production of IGF-I in the mammary gland. Growth hormone binds to its receptor in the mammary fat pad, after which production of IGF-I mRNA and IGF-I protein occurs. It is likely that IGF-I then works through paracrine means to stimulate formation of TEBs, which then form ducts by bifurcating or trifurcating and extending through the mammary fat pad. By the time pubertal development is complete a tree-like structure of branching ducts fills the rodent mammary fat pad. In addition to requiring IGF-I in order to act, estradiol also directly synergizes with IGF-I to enhance formation of TEBs and ductal morphogenesis. Together they increase IRS-1 phosphorylation and cell proliferation, and inhibit apoptosis. In fact, the entire process of ductal morphogenesis, in oophorectomized IGF-I(-/-) knockout female mice, can occur as a result of the combined actions of estradiol and IGF-I. IGF-I also permits progesterone action in the mammary gland. Together they have been shown to stimulate a form of ductal morphogenesis, which is anatomically different from the kind induced by IGF-I and estradiol. Although both progesterone and estradiol synergize with IGF-I by increasing IGF-I action parameters, there must be other, as yet unknown mechanisms that account for the anatomical differences in the different forms of ductal morphogenesis observed (hyperplasia in response to IGF-I plus estradiol and single layered ducts in response to IGF-I plus progesterone).

Growth hormone (GH) plays a role in regulating growth and differentiation of immature glandular structures In the m y gland, but the mechanisms by which the hormone exerts these effects are unknown. We have previously found that GH stimulates insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) I mRNA production within the my gnds of hypophysectomized rats. In this study we set out to determine if IGF-I administration could mimic the action of GH in initiating mammary gland differentiation and development. Two forms of IGF-I, intact and amino-terminally shortened [des-(1-3)-IGF-IJ, were found to induce the development of terminal end buds and the formation of alveolar structures in the mammary glands of hypophysectomized, castrated, and estradlol-treated sexually immature male rats. The effect of both forms of IGF-I was similar to that obtained with human GH, but the truncated form was at least 5 times more potent than intact IGF-I. These findings suggest that the inductive effect of GH on glaular difrentiation is mediated by the GH-induced production of IGF-I or a related molecule within the mammary gland itself.The growth and differentiation of the mammary gland that takes place during puberty is triggered by the increased secretion of estrogen (1, 2). It has long been known, however, that this developmental process also requires the hormonal support of the pituitary, since in hypophysectomized animals estrogen alone does not promote mammary growth (3-6), but full experimental mammary development can be obtained when estrogen is administered in combination with growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), progesterone, and glucocorticoids (refs. 4-6; see ref. 7 for a recent review).Postnatal mammary development begins before menarche, under complex hormonal control, when an immature ductal system differentiates and matures by enlarging, branching, and extending through structures called terminal end buds (TEBs) into the surrounding mammary stroma. Alveolar structures then develop from these TEBs. Further growth and maturation of the gland occurs during pregnancy in preparation for lactation (8).The effects of PRL and GH on lactogenesis (9-11) are much better understood than the effects of these hormones on postnatal mammary differentiation and development. Recently, we have made several observations that led us to suggest that GH, acting through its own specific receptor, is the central pituitary factor necessary for growth and development of the immature mammary gland. We found that lactogenic as well as nonlactogenic forms of GH are far more potent than PRLs from the same species in inducing mammary development in assays employing hypophysectomized, castrated, and estradiol (E2)-treated, sexually immature rats (12). Moreover, mammary development was not impaired in rhesus monkeys in which PRL secretion was maximally inhibited (13). In recent experiments, we also found that only those naturally occurring or mutant lactogens or somatogens that avidly bind to GH receptors in rat liver are potent inducers of the initial mamm...

Progestins have been implicated in breast cancer development, yet a role for progesterone (Pg) in ductal morphogenesis (DM) has not been established. To determine whether Pg could cause DM, we compared relative effects of Pg, estradiol (E2) and IGF-I on anatomical and molecular biological parameters of IGF-I-related DM in oophorectomized female IGF-I(-/-) mice. Pg had little independent effect on mammary development, but together with IGF-I, in the absence of E2, Pg stimulated an extensive network of branching ducts, occupying 92% of the gland vs. 28.3% with IGF-I alone, resembling pubertal development (P < 0.002). Its major effect was on enhancing duct length and branching (P < 0.002). Additionally, Pg enhanced phosphorylation of IRS-1, increased cell division, and increased the antiapoptotic effect of IGF-I. Pg action was inhibited by RU486 (P < 0.01). E2 also stimulated DM by enhancing IGF-I action but had a greater effect on terminal end bud formation and side branching (P < 0.002). In contrast to previous findings, long-term exposure to E2 alone, without IGF-I, caused formation of ducts and side branches, a novel finding. Both IGF-I and E2 were found necessary for Pg-induced alveolar development. In conclusion, Pg, through Pg receptor can enhance IGF-I action in DM, and E2 acts through a similar mechanism; E2 alone caused formation of ducts and side branches; there were differences in the actions of Pg and E2, the former largely affecting duct formation and extension, and the latter side branching; and both IGF-I and E2 were necessary for Pg to form mature alveoli.

Recent evidence from our laboratory suggests that GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) mediate glandular mammary development together with estrogen. It has also been well established that both stromal and epithelial elements must interact for mammary glandular development to occur. To determine whether the effect of GH is mediated by the stromal or epithelial tissue, we set up the following experiment. Bovine GH (bGH; 100 microg) or BSA (as a control), without or with estradiol (E2), was injected i.p. into sexually immature female rats that were hypophysectomized and oophorectomized. Mammary glands and subscapular fat pads were removed from the animals. The mammary glands were divided into two parts: a gland-free fat pad and remaining glandular tissue. The end point of bGH activity was induction of IGF-I messenger RNA (mRNA). This was determined quantitatively by solution hybridization and also by RT-PCR. We found that the effects of GH on stimulation of IGF-I mRNA in the gland-free mammary fat pad and the remainder of the mammary gland were similar (3.6- vs. 3.9-fold, respectively; P < 0.001). In both sorts of mammary tissue, bGH was found to synergize with E2 in the induction of IGF-I mRNA (5.8- vs. 5.3-fold; P < 0.001). There was also an increase in IGF-I mRNA in subscapular fat pads in response to 100 microg bGH (5.3-fold; P < 0.001); however, no synergism between bGH and E2 was found. These data indicate that bGH works as well on mammary stromal tissue as on tissue with glands and suggests that GH acts on the stromal compartment of the mammary gland to induce IGF-I mRNA and possibly IGF-I itself, which, in turn, causes differentiation of epithelial ducts into terminal end buds. These data also might explain why mammary epithelium is also able to differentiate in nonmammary fat pads when transplanted there.

In contrast to established dogma that PRL is central in mammary development, and GH mimics PRL in affecting growth because of structural similarities, we found that both hGH, which is lactogenic, and rGH, which is non-lactogenic, were significantly more potent than hPRL and rPRL in stimulating mammary growth in rats. Additionally, hGH was more potent than hPRL in increasing mammary IGF-I mRNA content. These data indicate that GH has separate effects on parameters of mammary gland growth, suggesting an independent role for GH in mammary growth.

Somatostatin analogs (SAs) treat acromegaly by lowering pituitary GH secretion, which, in turn, lowers systemic IGF-I. The profound systemic effect is often greater than expected in the face of only partial GH suppression. Here we report that the SA SOM230 can also act by a nonpituitary-mediated inhibition of IGF-I action. SOM230 inhibited mammary development in intact and hypophysectomized female rats, a process requiring IGF-I. IGF-I overcame this inhibition. SOM230 also inhibited other actions of IGF-I (inhibition of apoptosis, phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1, and cell division). SOM230 did not reduce IGF-I mRNA abundance in mammary gland but did stimulate IGF binding protein 5 (IGFBP5). IGFBP5 was 3.75 times higher in mammary epithelium of SOM230 than in placebo animals (P < 0.001). Administration of IGFBP-5 also inhibited GH-induced mammary development (P < 0.001). Measurement of sstr(1-5) (somatostatin subtype receptor) by real-time RT-PCR revealed that the mammary glands had an abundance of sstr(3) and lower amounts of sstr(4) and sstr(5) but no sstr(1) or sstr(2.) That mammary development was also inhibited to a lesser degree than SOM230 by octreotide, whose main action is through sstr(2), strongly suggests that sstr(3) is at least in part mediating the effects of the SAs. We conclude that 1) SAs inhibit IGF-I action in the mammary gland through a novel nonpituitary mechanism; 2) IGFBP-5, here shown to inhibit pubertal mammary development, might mediate the effect; and 3) Measurement of available sstr receptors in the mammary gland suggests that sstr(3) mediates the SA activity, but sstr(5) is also a possible mediator.

We have shown that nonlactogenic rat (r) GH is far more potent than rPRL in inducing rat mammary development. To determine the relative roles of GH and PRL in mammary development and their mechanisms of action, we have compared the abilities of a group of native and mutant GHs, PRLs, and placental lactogens (PLs) to induce mammary development, bind to GH receptors, and activate lactogenic receptors. Mammary development was assessed histologically by counting terminal end buds and alveolar structures in glands from sexually immature, hypophysectomized, castrated, estradiol-treated rats. Hormones were implanted, in Elvax pellets, into the lumbar mammary gland. Significant increases in terminal end buds (P < 0.03) over internal control values were obtained with rGH, recombinant human GH (rhGH), rbGH, and one of two mutant rhGHs. These four hormones were also found to bind to GH receptors with high affinity. In contrast, little development occurred with hPRL, rPRL, rhPL, ovine PRL, mutant forms of rhPRL and rhPL, and a mutant of rhGH altered to reduce binding to GH and PRL receptors. All of these substances are more than 50-fold reduced in binding to the GH receptor, yet can bind and activate lactogenic receptors. Thus, only those natural or mutant pituitary or placental hormones with high binding affinity to GH receptors induce mammary development, suggesting that GH receptors play a central role in this process.