The mouse prostate gland develops by branching morphogenesis from the urogenital epithelium and mesenchyme. Androgens and developmental factors, including FGF10 and SHH, promote prostate growth (Berman, D.M., Desai, N., Wang, X., Karhadkar, S.S., Reynon, M., Abate-Shen, C., Beachy, P.A., Shen, M.M., 2004. Roles for Hedgehog signaling in androgen production and prostate ductal morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 267, 387-398; Donjacour, A.A., Thomson, A.A., Cunha, G.R., 2003. FGF-10 plays an essential role in the growth of the fetal prostate. Dev. Biol. 261, 39-54), while BMP4 signaling from the mesenchyme has been shown to suppresses prostate branching (Lamm, M.L., Podlasek, C.A., Barnett, D.H., Lee, J., Clemens, J.Q., Hebner, C.M., Bushman, W., 2001. Mesenchymal factor bone morphogenetic protein 4 restricts ductal budding and branching morphogenesis in the developing prostate. Dev. Biol. 232, 301-314). Here, we show that Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 (BMP7) restricts branching of the prostate epithelium. BMP7 is expressed in the periurethral urogenital mesenchyme prior to formation of the prostate buds and, subsequently, in the prostate epithelium. We show that BMP7(lacZ/lacZ) null prostates show a two-fold increase in prostate branching, while recombinant BMP7 inhibits prostate morphogenesis in organ culture in a concentration-dependent manner. We further explore the mechanisms by which the developmental signals may be interpreted in the urogenital epithelium to regulate branching morphogenesis. We show that Notch1 activity is associated with the formation of the prostate buds, and that Notch1 signaling is derepressed in BMP7 null urogenital epithelium. Based on our studies, we propose a model that BMP7 inhibits branching morphogenesis in the prostate and limits the number of domains with high Notch1/Hes1 activity.

A screen for proteins that interact with beta 2-syntrophin led to the isolation of MAST205 (microtubule-associated serine/threonine kinase-205 kD) and a newly identified homologue, SAST (syntrophin-associated serine/threonine kinase). Binding studies showed that beta 2-syntrophin and MAST205/SAST associated via a PDZ-PDZ domain interaction. MAST205 colocalized with beta 2-syntrophin and utrophin at neuromuscular junctions. SAST colocalized with syntrophin in cerebral vasculature, spermatic acrosomes and neuronal processes. SAST and syntrophin were highly associated with purified microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins, whereas utrophin and dystrophin were only partially associated with microtubules. Our data suggest that MAST205 and SAST link the dystrophin/utrophin network with microtubule filaments via the syntrophins.

BTG2, a p53-inducible antiproliferative gene, is stimulated in breast cancer cells by activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-jB). In rat mammary glands, BTG2 is expressed in epithelial cells and levels decreased during pregnancy and lactation but recovered during involution. Estrogen and progestin suppress BTG2 expression, suggesting that these steroids, which stimulate proliferation and lobuloalveolar development of mammary epithelial cells, may downregulate BTG2 in the mammary gland during pregnancy. Consistent with the report that BTG2 inhibits cyclin D1 expression, suppression of BTG2 mRNA in the mammary gland during gestation, and by estrogen and progestin, correlated with stimulation of cyclin D1. Ectopic expression of BTG2 inhibited breast cancer cell growth by arresting cells in the G1 phase, an effect reversed by cyclin D1. BTG2 expression was very low or undetectable in human breast cancer cell lines compared with nontumorigenic mammary epithelial cells, and nuclear expression of BTG2 was absent in 65% of human breast tumors compared with adjacent matched normal glands. Spontaneous mammary tumors arising in a mouse model with targeted expression of the early region of the SV40 large tumor Ag demonstrated loss of BTG2 protein very early during the tumorigenic process. Thus deregulation of BTG2 may be an important step in the development of mammary tumors.

No abstract

Abstract. The folding of or-and/3-tubulin requires three proteins: the heteromeric TCP-l-containing cytoplasmic chaperonin and two additional protein cofactors (A and B). We show that these cofactors participate in the folding process and do not merely trigger release, since in the presence of Mg-ATP alone, u-and B-tubulin target proteins are discharged from cytoplasmic chaperonin in a nonnative form. Like the prokaryotic cochaperonin GroES, which interacts with the prototypical Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL and regulates its ATPase activity, cofactor A modulates the ATPase activity of its cognate chaperonin. However, the sequence of cofactor A derived from a cloned cDNA defines a 13-kD polypeptide with no significant homology to other known proteins. Moreover, while GroES functions as a heptameric ring, cofactor A behaves as a dimer. Thus, cofactor A is a novel cochaperonin that is structurally unrelated to GroES.

O 2 sensing in diverse protozoa depends on the prolyl 4 hydroxylation of Skp1 and modification of the resulting hydroxyproline with a series of five sugars. In yeast, plants, and animals, Skp1 is associated with F-box proteins. The Skp1-F-box protein heterodimer can, for many F-box proteins, dock onto cullin-1 en route to assembly of the Skp1-cullin-1-F-box protein-Rbx1 subcomplex of E3 SCF Ub ligases. E3 SCF Ub ligases conjugate Lys48-polyubiquitin chains onto targets bound to the substrate receptor domains of F-box proteins, preparing them for recognition by the 26S proteasome. In the social amoeba Dictyostelium, we found that O 2 availability was rate-limiting for the hydroxylation of newly synthesized Skp1. To investigate the effect of reduced hydroxylation, we analyzed knockout mutants of the Skp1 prolyl hydroxylase and each of the Skp1 glycosyltransferases. Proteomic analysis of co-immunoprecipitates showed that wild-type cells able to fully glycosylate Skp1 had a greater abundance of an SCF complex containing the cullin-1 homolog CulE and FbxD, a newly described WD40-type F-box protein, than the complexes that predominate in cells defective in Skp1 hydroxylation or glycosylation. Similarly, the previously described FbxA-Skp1CulA complex was also more abundant in glycosylation-competent cells. The CulE interactome also included higher levels of proteasomal regulatory particles when Skp1 was glycosylated, suggesting increased activity consistent with greater association with F-box proteins. Finally, the interactome of FLAG-FbxD was modified when it harbored an F-box mutation that compromised Skp1 binding, consistent with an effect on the abundance of potential substrate proteins. We Timely protein degradation is a cornerstone of cell cycling and the regulation of numerous physiological and developmental processes. Eukaryotes have evolved an extensive array of polyubiquitination enzymes to tag proteins on a proteinby-protein basis as a recognition marker for degradation in the 26S proteasome. The cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) 1 are a prominent subgroup of these enzymes (1) and consist of an E3 architecture that includes a substrate receptor, an adaptor (in most cases), the cullin scaffold, the RING protein, and an exchangeable E2 ubiquitin donor that has been charged with ubiquitin (Ub) by an E1 enzyme. The first discovered and still prototypic example is the CRL1 class (2), also referred to as SCF on account of the names of its founding subunits, Skp1, cullin-1, and F-box proteins (FBPs). The CRL1 (or SCF) complexes utilize FBPs as substrate receptors, Skp1 as the adaptor linking the FBP to the N-terminal region of cullin-1 (Cul1), and Rbx1 as the RING protein that tethers the E2 Ub donor to the Cul1 C-terminal region (see Fig. 2B). CRL1s can be activated by neddylation of Cul1 by a Nedd8-specific E2, which mobilizes Rbx1 to afford rotational flexibility of the E2 and displaces the inhibitor Cand1, permitting docking of the Skp1-FBP heterodimer (3-5). Deneddylation mediated by the eight-subunit COP...

B cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) is a p53 target that negatively regulates cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage and other stress. The objective of this study was to examine the expression, regulation and tumor suppressor properties of BTG2 in prostate cells. By immunohistochemistry BTG2 protein was detected in approximately 50% of basal cells in benign glands from the peripheral zone of the human prostate. BTG2 was expressed in all hyperproliferative atrophic peripheral zone lesions examined (simple atrophy, post-atrophic hyperplasia and proliferative inflammatory atrophy), but was undetectable or detectable at very low levels in the hyperproliferative epithelial cells of HGPIN and prostate cancer. BTG2 mRNA was detected in non-malignant prostate epithelial (PE) cells and in LNCaP cells, but not in PC-3 cells, consistent with p53-dependent regulation. In PE cells BTG2 protein was detected in areas of cell confluence by immunohistochemistry. BTG2 protein in LNCaP cells was undetectable by immunohistochemistry but was detected by immunoblotting at 8- to 9-fold lower levels than in PE cells. BTG2 protein levels were shown to be regulated by the ubiquitin-proteosome system. Forced expression of BTG2 in PC-3 cells was accompanied by a decreased rate of cell proliferation and decreased tumorigenicity of these cells in vivo. Taken together, these findings suggest that BTG2 functions as a tumor suppressor in prostate cells that is activated by cell quiescence, cell growth stimuli as part of a positive feedback mechanism and in response to DNA damage or other cell stress. The low steady-state levels of BTG2 protein in HGPIN and prostate cancer, a potential consequence of increased proteosomal degradation, may have important implications in the initiation and progression of malignant prostate lesions. Furthermore, these findings suggest that a significant component of the p53 G(1) arrest pathway might be inactivated in prostate cancer even in the absence of genetic mutations in p53.

Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in both stromal and epithelial cells of the prostate. The majority of studies on AR expression and function in prostate cancer is focused on malignant epithelial cells rather than stromal cells. In this study, we examined the levels of stromal AR in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer and the function of stromal AR in prostate cancer growth and invasion. We showed that stromal AR levels were decreased in the areas surrounding cancerous tissue, especially in androgen-independent cancer. Using two telomerase-immortalized human stromal cell lines, one AR-positive and the other AR-negative, we demonstrated that stromal cells lacking AR stimulated cell proliferation of co-cultured prostate cancer cells in vitro and enhanced tumour growth in vivo when co-injected with PC3 epithelial cells in nude mice. In contrast, stromal cells expressing AR suppressed prostate cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. In parallel with cancer growth, in vitro invasion assays revealed that stromal cells lacking AR increased the invasion ability of PC3 cell by one order of magnitude, while stromal cells expressing AR reduced this effect. These results indicate a negative regulation of prostate cancer growth and invasion by stromal AR. This provides potentially new mechanistic insights into the failure of androgen ablation therapy, and the reactivation of stromal AR could be a novel therapeutic approach for treating hormone refractory prostate cancer.