Tandem configuration is an effective methodology to reduce flow separation on compressor blade suction surface and to improve blade loading. However, in modern highly loaded cases, corner separation remains as its single blade counterpart. In this study, non-axisymmetric endwall profiling (NAEP) was utilized in a highly loaded tandem cascade (diffusion factor D = 0.69), aiming at reducing its severe corner separation and revealing the unique flow mechanism while NAEP is utilized in tandem cascade. NAEP was designed in both forward (F) blade and rare (R) blade separately, and was investigated numerically in tandem environment. Results show that, NAEP in F blade passage can effectively eliminate the corner separation and reduce loss generation, whereas NAEP in R blade passage has no positive effect on corner separation and even promotes loss production. The optimal NAEP approximately removes the corner separation completely, with loss coefficient reducing by as much as 37.8%. The optimal NAEP for the tandem cascade features optimal axial location at the origin of corner separation. There is an optimal NAEP height (0.02 of blade height), under which NAEP can achieve pretty good control effect while the peak of NAEP varies in a large axial location range. In the tandem configuration, it is found that NAEP transfers blade loading from R blade to F blade; the static pressure increases significantly for the entire cascade, but the static pressure distribution of F blade does not exhibit as the design intent of NAEP. In addition, it is interesting to find that the flow turning near endwall reduces after endwall profiling, which is unique in tandem cascade and is contrast to the view on conventional configuration. On the contrary, NAEP in R blade has no influence on the corner separation of the tandem cascade; due to the decrement of cross-passage pressure gradient for R blade, the flow overturning near endwall reduces.
The active flow control technique of vortex-generator jet (VGJ) was used to control the turbulent separation of a highly loaded compressor cascade at a high incidence. VGJ schemes on suction surface with different jet locations, skewed angles, pitch angles were numerically performed and the control mechanism of VGJ parameters on the flow field of the cascade was revealed. For avoiding the effect of endwall boundary layer, both endwall surfaces of the cascade were set to translational periodicity boundary (TPB). Results show that VGJ significantly eliminates the turbulent separation and improves the performance of cascade. The overall loss coefficient of cascade is reduced by 52.3% at most. The optimal VGJ location in this study is not separation location but 7% axial chord downstream of it, which is probably due to the ultra-high loading of the cascade. The spanwise location and intensity of jet vortices are mainly affected by skewed angle, and will increase with the skewed angle. The VGJ case with a higher pitch angle features better control effect on suction surface but increases the pitchwise scale of the low-velocity region. In addition, as pitch angle increases, the mixing loss between mainstream and jet flow increases, which brings a negative effect on cascade performance. In order to enhance the momentum transporting between mainstream flow and separation flow, counter vortex-generator jet (CVGJ) schemes were designed and studied. Though CVGJ strengthens the jet vortices near the trailing edge and achieves minimum loss near TPB sections at 150% axial chord section, the interaction of jet vortices with opposite rotating direction brings extra loss, which leads to the control effect of CVGJ is weaker than that of VGJ.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.