Tandem configuration is an effective methodology to reduce flow separation on compressor blade suction surface and to improve blade loading. However, in modern highly loaded cases, corner separation remains as its single blade counterpart. In this study, non-axisymmetric endwall profiling (NAEP) was utilized in a highly loaded tandem cascade (diffusion factor D = 0.69), aiming at reducing its severe corner separation and revealing the unique flow mechanism while NAEP is utilized in tandem cascade. NAEP was designed in both forward (F) blade and rare (R) blade separately, and was investigated numerically in tandem environment. Results show that, NAEP in F blade passage can effectively eliminate the corner separation and reduce loss generation, whereas NAEP in R blade passage has no positive effect on corner separation and even promotes loss production. The optimal NAEP approximately removes the corner separation completely, with loss coefficient reducing by as much as 37.8%. The optimal NAEP for the tandem cascade features optimal axial location at the origin of corner separation. There is an optimal NAEP height (0.02 of blade height), under which NAEP can achieve pretty good control effect while the peak of NAEP varies in a large axial location range. In the tandem configuration, it is found that NAEP transfers blade loading from R blade to F blade; the static pressure increases significantly for the entire cascade, but the static pressure distribution of F blade does not exhibit as the design intent of NAEP. In addition, it is interesting to find that the flow turning near endwall reduces after endwall profiling, which is unique in tandem cascade and is contrast to the view on conventional configuration. On the contrary, NAEP in R blade has no influence on the corner separation of the tandem cascade; due to the decrement of cross-passage pressure gradient for R blade, the flow overturning near endwall reduces.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Air injection is an effectively methodology to suppress flow separation and to improve blade loading of airfoils and compressors. In order to remove corner separations in a cascade, investigation of endwall slotted injection was carried out numerically in this study. Based on endwall slot schemes of other flow control methods, six different endwall slots were designed, aiming at revealing the axial location effect and pitchwise location effect. For each endwall slot, numerical simulations were performed with six different injection directions to uncover the injection direction effect. Results showed that endwall slotted injection can effectively remove the corner separation. The overall loss coefficient and endwall loss coefficient of the cascade were reduced by 10.3% and 36.8% at most, respectively. Injection from leading edge and mid-chord can reduce endwall loss; however, the optimal axial location of endwall slot is near the trailing edge, where the corner separation is located. Different with other flow control methods, in general, the optimal pitchwise location of endwall slot is not close to suction surface but 0.16 pitch away from it. Injection near the suction surface is more sensitive to injection direction compared with injection at 0.16 pitch away from suction surface. Injection with velocity components both downstream and toward suction surface promises optimal control effect on corner separation. However, at mid-span, trailing edge separation is deteriorated and the flow turning angle is reduced, the flow mechanism being that the low-momentum fluid migrates along spanwise.

In highly loaded tandem compressor cascades, corner separations can still exist. In order to eliminate corner separations in highly loaded tandem compressor cascades, incoming vortex–corner separation interaction mechanism was investigated. Different schemes of the vortex generators, which located at different pitchwise locations and could generate vortexes with different rotation directions, were designed and investigated numerically. Results show that, severe corner separation occurred at the front blade passage of the tandem cascade; by utilizing flow control method of incoming vortex–corner separation interaction, the corner separation could be reduced significantly. The optimal control effect of incoming vortex on corner separation was achieved with anticlockwise rotation and the vortex generator is located right ahead of the leading edge of tandem cascade, a maximum loss coefficient reduction of 21.8% being achieved. Different from single blade configuration, the boundary layer of tandem cascade was regenerated at rear blade suction surface due to the injection flow from blade gap between the two blades. Though corner separations could be reduced at both conditions, the loss of tandem cascade with clockwise incoming vortex is higher than that with anticlockwise vortex, and a smaller corner separation region at suction surface was achieved by utilizing clockwise vortex. The mechanism was that anticlockwise incoming vortex reduced the corner separation but increased secondary flow, while clockwise vortex enhanced passage vortex and decreased secondary flow. For clockwise incoming vortex near pressure surface, the vortex would be divided into two parts at the leading edge of rear blade, one would go through the blade gap and deteriorate flow fluid near rear blade suction surface, the other flowed downstream along pressure surface. The rotation direction of different incoming vortexes became the same as the passage vortex at rear blade passage of tandem cascade, which was mainly due to the effect of secondary flow.

To reveal the influence of distortion of S-duct on the flow field and performance of transonic fan, full annulus unsteady numerical simulation was carried out under S-duct/fan integrated condition. This study focuses on the coupling flow of S-duct/fan integrated condition under peak efficiency (PE) condition and near stall (NS) condition. Results show that, compared with the condition that S-duct or fan is investigated alone, the distortion of S-duct is suppressed under S-duct/fan integrated condition. The curved structure of S-duct is the important reason for the flow migration from undistorted region to distortion region. Higher inlet relative Mach number and more work input of the rotor are observed in the counter-swirl region. The flow separation in S-duct is weakened under NS condition compared with that of PE condition. Counter-swirl region of blade tip has larger region of blockage, and rotating stall inception is most likely to occur in this region.

The active flow control technique of vortex-generator jet (VGJ) was used to control the turbulent separation of a highly loaded compressor cascade at a high incidence. VGJ schemes on suction surface with different jet locations, skewed angles, pitch angles were numerically performed and the control mechanism of VGJ parameters on the flow field of the cascade was revealed. For avoiding the effect of endwall boundary layer, both endwall surfaces of the cascade were set to translational periodicity boundary (TPB). Results show that VGJ significantly eliminates the turbulent separation and improves the performance of cascade. The overall loss coefficient of cascade is reduced by 52.3% at most. The optimal VGJ location in this study is not separation location but 7% axial chord downstream of it, which is probably due to the ultra-high loading of the cascade. The spanwise location and intensity of jet vortices are mainly affected by skewed angle, and will increase with the skewed angle. The VGJ case with a higher pitch angle features better control effect on suction surface but increases the pitchwise scale of the low-velocity region. In addition, as pitch angle increases, the mixing loss between mainstream and jet flow increases, which brings a negative effect on cascade performance. In order to enhance the momentum transporting between mainstream flow and separation flow, counter vortex-generator jet (CVGJ) schemes were designed and studied. Though CVGJ strengthens the jet vortices near the trailing edge and achieves minimum loss near TPB sections at 150% axial chord section, the interaction of jet vortices with opposite rotating direction brings extra loss, which leads to the control effect of CVGJ is weaker than that of VGJ.