Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) exacerbate various forms of urticaria by a nonallergic mechanism involving inhibition of cyclooxygenases.Objectives: To assess safety of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) and NSAID sensitivity and to evaluate a role of cysteinyl leukotriene metabolism and mast cell activation in sensitivity to NSAIDs in CIU.Design: Aspirin challenge test followed by randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors.Setting: Tertiary referral center of a university hospital.Patients: Thirty-six patients with CIU.Interventions: Aspirin challenge test (up to 500 mg); randomized trial with rofecoxib (up to 37.5 mg) and celecoxib (up to 300 mg) in aspirin-sensitive patients. After completion of the trial, 7 patients received naproxen sodium (500 mg) as a positive control.Main Outcome Measures: Standardized skin examination, skin biopsy with mast cell count, urinary levels of leukotriene E 4 (LTE 4 ), and serum levels of mast cell tryptase.
ObjectiveInterleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48.ResultsAt week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE.ConclusionsTreatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment.Trial registration numberNCT01645280.
AimsHuman stresscopin is a corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) type 2 receptor (CRFR 2 ) selective agonist and a member of the CRF peptide family. Stimulation of CRFR 2 improves cardiac output and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with stable heart failure (HF) with reduced LVEF. We examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects on haemodynamics and serum biomarkers of intravenous human stresscopin acetate (JNJ-39588146) in patients with stable HF with LVEF ≤ 35% and cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 L/min/m 2 .
Methods and resultsSixty-two patients with HF and LVEF ≤ 35% were instrumented with a pulmonary artery catheter and randomly assigned (ratio 3:1) to receive an intravenous infusion of JNJ-39588146 or placebo. The main study was an ascending dose study of three doses (5, 15, and 30 ng/kg/min) of study drug or placebo administered in sequential 1 h intervals (3 h total). Statistically significant increases in CI and reduction in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were observed with both the 15 ng/kg/min (2 h time point) and 30 ng/kg/min (3 h time point) doses of JNJ-39588146 without significant changes in heart rate (HR) or systolic blood pressure (SBP). No statistically significant reductions in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were seen with any dose tested in the primary analysis, although a trend towards reduction was seen.
ConclusionIn HF patients with reduced LVEF and CI, ascending doses of JNJ-39588146 were associated with progressive increases in CI and reductions in SVR without significant effects on PCWP, HR, or SBP.
1 Full inhibition of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation was elicited by the least maximal platelet inhibitory concentrations of nitric oxide (NO; 7 + 1 pM) or NO-donors which included sodium nitroprusside (NaNp; 80 + 13 pM), 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1; 3 + 0.1 pM) or endothelial cells (EC; 2.36 + 0.12 x 105) added min before thrombin. Oxyhaemoglobin (oxyHb; 10pM) administered 30s to 10min after stimulation with thrombin caused a time-dependent reversal of the inhibition induced by these agents. OxyHb was ineffective when these agents were co-incubated with the non-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX, 0.05 mM). 2 OxyHb did not reverse the platelet inhibition with IBMX (0.2mM) or that caused by a selective guanosine 3': 5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic GMP) phosphodiesterase inhibitor 2-O-propoxyphenyl-8-azapurin-6-one, (M & B 22948; 20,pM). In addition, oxyHb did not reverse the inhibition with iloprost (1 nM) which inhibits platelet aggregation through stimulation of adenylate cyclase.3 The inhibition of platelet aggregation by NO (7 + 1 pM) or NaNp (80 + 13 pM) was accompanied by a 13 fold increase in cyclic GMP levels occurring within 15s of addition of these agents. In the continued presence of NO or NaNp, the reversing effect of oxyHb given 1 min after thrombin was associated with a pronounced decrease in cyclic GMP levels. 4 We conclude that the inhibition of platelet aggregation by activators of guanylate cyclase depends in the first few minutes on continuous stimulation of the enzyme in order to maintain intracellular concentrations of cyclic GMP, except when its breakdown is inhibited. 5 The addition of agents such as oxyHb after the inhibition of platelet aggregation offers another way of investigating the biochemical changes involved in maintaining platelets in an inactive state.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.