Cancer in adolescents and young adults has unique features in addition to the special medical, physical, psychological, and social needs of patients in this age group. The spectrum of malignant diseases is different from that in any other period in life, and it is strikingly different from the pattern in older persons. More people 15-25 years of age are diagnosed to have cancer than during the first 15 years of life. During the last 25 years, the incidence of cancer in this age range has increased faster while the increase in their cancer survival rates has been significantly lower than in younger or older patients, especially in comparison to results of the national pediatric cooperative cancer groups. Thus the 5-year outcome in 15-19 year olds with leukemias and sarcomas is not only worse than in younger patients, but also lower in this population at large than in patients of the same age treated at Children's Cancer Group institutions. In the United States, only approximately 5% of 15-25 year olds with cancer are entered onto clinical trials, in contrast to 60-65% of younger patients. Thus, cancer during adolescence and early adult life is an underestimated challenge that merits specific resources, solutions, and an international focus.
BACKGROUND:With prior reports indicating a lack of progress in survival improvement in older adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15 to 39 years with cancer compared with both younger and older patients with cancer, the current analysis provides an update of survival trends of cancers among AYAs, children, and older adults. METHODS: Data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for 13 regions were used to ascertain survival trends of the 34 most frequent cancers diagnosed in AYAs compared with children and older adults. RESULTS: As of 2002 through 2006, the 5-year relative survival rate for all invasive cancers in AYAs was 82.5% (standard error, 0.2%). In AYAs, 14 cancers demonstrated evidence of a statistically significant improvement in their 5-year relative survival since 1992. Survival improved less in AYAs than in children for acute myeloid leukemia and medulloblastoma. Fourteen cancers had survival improvements that were found to be less in AYAs compared with older adults, including hepatic carcinoma, acute myeloid leukemia, high-grade astrocytoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, pancreatic carcinoma, low-grade astrocytoma, gastric carcinoma, renal carcinoma, cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx, Hodgkin lymphoma, ovarian cancer, fibromatous sarcoma, other soft tissue sarcoma, and thyroid carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the survival of several cancer types that occur frequently in AYAs are encouraging. However, survival does not appear to be improving to the same extent in AYAs as in children or older adults for several cancers. Further investment in exploring the distinct biology of tumors in this age group, and of their hosts, must be a priority in AYA oncology.
Since 1968, the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) has treated more than 16 000 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Herein, we report improvements obtained in CCG trials during two successive series of studies (1983-1988 and 1989-1995). Overall, 10-year EFS was 62% ± 10% for the 1983-1988 series and 72% ± 1% for the 1988-1995 series (P Ͻ 0.0001). Five-year cumulative rates of isolated CNS relapses were 5.9% and 4.4%. Therapy based on the Berlin-Frankfurt-Mü nster 76/79 study improved outcomes for intermediate and higher risk patients in the first series. For intermediate risk patients, delayed intensification (DI) was most crucial for improved outcome and cranial irradiation was safely replaced with maintenance intrathecal methotrexate, providing patients received intensified systemic therapy. In the second series, randomized trials showed better outcome with one vs no DI phase for lower risk patients, with two vs one DI phase for intermediate risk patients, and with the CCG 'augmented regimen' for higher risk patients with a slow day 7 marrow response. Cranial irradiation was safely replaced with additional intrathecal methotrexate for higher risk patients with a rapid day 7 marrow response. In a subsequent study, substitution of dexamethasone in place of prednisone in induction and maintenance improved outcome for standard risk patients. All patients received dexamethasone in DI. These successful treatment strategies form the basis for our current ALL trials. Leukemia (2000) 14, 2223-2233.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.