Although genetic markers identifying women at an increased risk of developing breast cancer exist, the majority of inherited risk factors remain elusive. Mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene confer a substantial increase in breast cancer risk, yet routine clinical genetic screening is limited to the coding regions and intronexon boundaries, precluding the identification of mutations in noncoding and untranslated regions. Because 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) polymorphisms disrupting microRNA (miRNA) binding can be functional and can act as genetic markers of cancer risk, we aimed to determine genetic variation in the 3'UTR of BRCA1/BRCA2 in familial and early-onset breast cancer patients with and without mutations in the coding regions of BRCA1/ BRCA2 and to identify specific 3'UTR variants that may be risk factors for cancer development. The 3'UTRs of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened by heteroduplex analysis and DNA sequencing in 100 patients from 46 BRCA1/2 families, 54 non-BRCA1/2 families, and 47 geographically matched controls. Two polymorphisms were identified. SNPs c.*1287C>T (rs12516) (BRCA1) and c.*105A>C (rs15869) (BRCA2) were identified in 27% and 24% of patients, respectively. These 2 variants were also identified in controls with no family history of cancer (23.4% and 23.4%, respectively). In comparison to variations in the 3'UTR region of the BRCA1/2 genes and the BRCA1/2 mutational status in patients, there was a statistically significant relationship between the BRCA1 gene polymorphism c.*1287C>T (rs12516) and BRCA1 mutations (p=0.035) by Fisher's Exact Test. SNP c.*1287C>T (rs12516) of the BRCA1 gene may have potential use as a genetic marker of an increased risk of developing breast cancer and likely represents a non-coding sequence variation in BRCA1 that impacts BRCA1 function and leads to increased early-onset and/or familial breast cancer risk in the Turkish population.

Background and Aims BK virus nephropathy occurs in up to 10% of kidney transplant recipients and can result in graft loss. The reactivation of BK virus is largely asymptomatic, and routine surveillance especially in the first 12-24 months after transplant is necessary for early recognition and intervention. Reduced immunosuppression and antiviral treatment in the early stages may be effective in stopping BK virus replication. This study is designed to investigate the effect of management in immunosuppressive therapy on BK virus titers and graft functions in our kidney transplant group. Method A total of 370 kidney transplant recipients between the ages of 18-69 years and receiving a triple immunosuppressive therapy (Tacrolimus+Mycophenoloic Acid+Prednisolone) were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, BK virus titers, serum creatinine and immunosuppressive drug (Tacrolimus, Everolimus) levels were measured at regular intervals in the first 24 months. Among these patients 43 of them were found to have BK virus positivity. At the time of the detection of BK virus positivity, patients were divided into three groups regarding the change in the immunosuppressive protocols: Group I: Tacrolimus + Everolimus + Prednisolone, Group II: Everolimus + Prednisolone, Group III: Tacrolimus + Prednisolone. BK virus titers and graft functions of all three groups were compared with each other. SPSS 15 for Windows was used for statistical analysis. Results The mean age of the patients was 45.3 years, and the mean duration of transplantation was 16.3 months at the time of the BK virus positivity. During the follow-up, mean Tacrolimus levels were found to be in their highest value (14.1 ng/mL) in the posttransplant three months while BK virus titer reached the highest value (1.1x106 copies/ml) in the posttransplant seven to nine months. Increased creatinine values two months after BK virus positivity were strongly correlated (p = 0.02, p = 0.008, p = 0.05, p = 0.002 at 6th, 9th, 12th and 24th months, respectively). A significant decrease in BK virus titers was observed in all three groups due to reductions in immunosuppressive treatment protocol (p = 0.005, p = 0.003, p = 0.028, in groups I, II, III respectively). Conclusion Our study favors the benefits of the prospective screening for BK virus to identify early viral replication, permit intervention, and prevent progression to nephropathy or allograft loss. The best studied treatment for BK viremia and nephropathy is careful reduction of immunosuppression

Background and Aims Both under and over-dosing of tacrolimus may compromise clinical outcomes by exposing patients to either the risks of graft rejection or adverse events (AEs) associated with immunosuppressive therapy. This study is designed to compare the clinical follow-up of our kidney transplant recipients receiving once-daily, prolonged-release (PR-T; Advagraf) and twice-daily, immediate-release (IR-T; Prograf) tacrolimus in the early posttransplant period. Method This randomized study included 78 de novo, adult kidney transplant recipients to PR-T 0.15 mg/kg/day (Group I=39) and IR-T 0.15 mg/kg/day (Group II=39) for seven days in the posttransplant period. Demographic features and clinical parameters regarding levels of whole blood tacrolimus and serum creatinine were compared between the two groups. Presence of acute rejection and AEs were investigated. Dose adjustments were permitted to target a pre-defined therapeutic range based on measured trough blood concentrations in all patients. SPSS 15 for Windows was used for statistical analysis. Results None of the patients suffered from acute rejection and there were no AEs in the early posttransplant period. However, Group II patients were found to have higher whole blood tacrolimus levels on the posttransplant 1st, 4th and 7th days (p=0.02, p=0.009 and p=0.013 respectively). Also serum creatinine levels were significantly increased in Group II patients on the posttransplant 7th day (p=0.02). Conclusion Prolonged release tacrolimus seems promising in preventing acute transplant rejection with adequate blood levels, as well as making it possible to avoid the interindividual variation in absorption and early calcineurin inhibitor toxicity.