DNA methylation at proximal promoters facilitates lineage restriction by silencing cell type–specific genes. However, euchromatic DNA methylation frequently occurs in regions outside promoters. The functions of such nonproximal promoter DNA methylation are unclear. Here we show that the de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a is expressed in postnatal neural stem cells (NSCs) and is required for neurogenesis. Genome-wide analysis of postnatal NSCs indicates that Dnmt3a occupies and methylates intergenic regions and gene bodies flanking proximal promoters of a large cohort of transcriptionally permissive genes, many of which encode regulators of neurogenesis. Surprisingly, Dnmt3a-dependent nonproximal promoter methylation promotes expression of these neurogenic genes by functionally antagonizing Polycomb repression. Thus, nonpromoter DNA methylation by Dnmt3a may be used for maintaining active chromatin states of genes critical for development.

During development of the CNS, neurons and glia are generated in a sequential manner. The mechanism underlying the later onset of gliogenesis is poorly understood, although the cytokineinduced Jak-STAT pathway has been postulated to regulate astrogliogenesis. Here, we report that the overall activity of Jak-STAT signaling is dynamically regulated in mouse cortical germinal zone during development. As such, activated STAT1/3 and STAT-mediated transcription are negligible at early, neurogenic stages, when neurogenic factors are highly expressed. At later, gliogenic periods, decreased expression of neurogenic factors causes robust elevation of STAT activity. Our data demonstrate a positive autoregulatory loop whereby STAT1/3 directly induces the expression of various components of the Jak-STAT pathway to strengthen STAT signaling and trigger astrogliogenesis. Forced activation of Jak-STAT signaling leads to precocious astrogliogenesis, and inhibition of this pathway blocks astrocyte differentiation. These observations suggest that autoregulation of the Jak-STAT pathway controls the onset of astrogliogenesis.During embryonic development, the generation of three major neural cell types (neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes) in the CNS occurs sequentially, whereby almost all neurons are generated before the appearance of glial cells 1,2 , with the exception of a few COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENTThe authors declare that they have no competing financial interests. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptNat Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 November 06. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript sites of postnatal and adult neurogenesis such as the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampus and the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the forebrain 3 . This strategy of building the CNS through sequential production of neurons and glia has become more comprehensible, as recent findings have demonstrated that glial cells are important in critical neuronal maturation processes such as axonal path finding and synapse formation [4][5][6] . It is conceivable that delayed or precocious production of glial cells may lead to inappropriate wiring, disorganization, and eventually, dysfunction of the CNS.The 'neurons-first, glia-second' differentiation theme for neural progenitors can be recapitulated in culture. Cortical neural progenitor stem cells isolated from relatively early embryonic stages (for example, mouse embryonic day (E) 10-11) give rise to neurons, not glial cells, after short-term culturing (fewer than 4 d), whereas cortical progenitors isolated from perinatal stages tend to differentiate into astrocytes under the same culture conditions 7 .In addition, both E10-11 cortical progenitors and embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem or progenitor cells (NSCs or NPCs) switch from being neurogenic to gliogenic over time in vitro 8,9 , suggesting that the molecular switch for the transition from neurogenesis to gliogenesis may be internally programmed in neural progenitors.S...

The postnatal forebrain subventricular zone (SVZ) harbors stem cells that give rise to olfactory bulb interneurons throughout life. The identity of stem cells in the adult SVZ has been extensively debated. Although, ependymal cells were once suggested to have stem cell characteristics, subsequent studies have challenged the initial report and postulated that subependymal GFAP ؉ cells were the stem cells. Here, we report that, in the adult mouse forebrain, immunoreactivity for a neural stem cell marker, prominin-1/CD133, is exclusively localized to the ependyma, although not all ependymal cells are CD133 ؉ . Using transplantation and genetic lineage tracing approaches, we demonstrate that CD133 ؉ ependymal cells continuously produce new neurons destined to olfactory bulb. Collectively, our data indicate that, compared with GFAP expressing adult neural stem cells, CD133 ؉ ependymal cells represent an additional-perhaps more quiescent-stem cell population in the mammalian forebrain.adult neural stem cells ͉ subventricular zone

SUMMARY The scarcity of tissue-specific stem cells and the complexity of their surrounding environment have made molecular characterization of these cells particularly challenging. Through single-cell transcriptome and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), we uncovered molecular properties of CD133+/GFAP− ependymal (E) cells in the adult mouse forebrain neurogenic zone. Surprisingly, prominent hub genes of the gene network unique to ependymal CD133+/GFAP− quiescent cells were enriched for immune-responsive genes, as well as genes encoding receptors for angiogenic factors. Administration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) activated CD133+ ependymal neural stem cells (NSCs), lining not only the lateral but also the fourth ventricles and, together with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), elicited subsequent neural lineage differentiation and migration. This study revealed the existence of dormant ependymal NSCs throughout the ventricular surface of the CNS, as well as signals abundant after injury for their activation.

After cell birth, almost all neurons in the mammalian central nervous system migrate. It is unclear whether and how cell migration is coupled with neurogenesis. Here we report that proneural basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors not only initiate neuronal differentiation but also potentiate cell migration. Mechanistically, proneural bHLH factors regulate the expression of genes critically involved in migration, including down-regulation of RhoA small GTPase and up-regulation of doublecortin and p35, which, in turn, modulate the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton assembly and enable newly generated neurons to migrate. In addition, we report that several DNA-binding-deficient proneural genes that fail to initiate neuronal differentiation still activate migration, whereas a different mutation of a proneural gene that causes a failure in initiating cell migration still leads to robust neuronal differentiation. Collectively, these data suggest that transcription programs for neurogenesis and migration are regulated by bHLH factors through partially distinct mechanisms.cortical migration ͉ doublecortin ͉ neuroD ͉ neurogenin ͉ RhoA

An overriding principle of development is that neurons become permanently postmitotic once they initiate differentiation. Work in our laboratory, however, has provided evidence for a population of progenitor cells in mammalian forebrain that express properties of differentiated neurons, even though they continue to divide. These neuronal progenitor cells are situated in the rostral migratory stream (RMS), which extends from a specialized portion of the subventricular zone surrounding the anterior tip of the lateral ventricle, referred to as the SVZa, to the middle of the olfactory bulb. As SVZa‐derived cells migrate to the olfactory bulb, they undergo cell division, and they never deviate from the RMS. Once they reach their final destinations, they become terminally postmitotic interneurons. This Mini‐Review concerns findings from our recent experiments designed to reveal the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms governing the proliferation and differentiation of the unique SVZa neuronal progenitor cells. We have investigated the role(s) of cell cycle regulatory proteins, in particular, the cell cycle inhibitor p19INK4d, in the control of SVZa cell proliferation. Several studies have indicated that cells withdraw from the cell cycle once they express p19INK4d. To begin to investigate whether p19INK4d(+) SVZa‐derived cells are postmitotic, we analyzed the pattern of p19INK4d expression by the cells of the RMS. A pronounced gradient of p19INK4d expression was demonstrated; progressively more cells are p19INK4d immunoreactive as the olfactory bulb is approached. In addition, the capacity of p19INK4d(+) cells to incorporate bromodeoxyuridine was investigated. From the results of these studies, we conclude that SVZa cells in the RMS can successively down‐regulate their expression of p19INK4d as they migrate and that they repeatedly exit and reenter the cell cycle while en route to the olfactory bulb. These studies led us to investigate whether bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are involved in the regulation of SVZa cell proliferation and p19INK4d expression, because, elsewhere in the CNS, BMPs modulate cell proliferation and influence cell fate decisions. To determine the effects of BMP signaling on SVZa cell proliferation and differentiation, we altered the expression of the BMP receptor Ia (BMPR‐Ia) using retrovirally mediated gene transfer. The cells in the SVZa encoding the wild‐type BMPR‐Ia exit the cell cycle and do not appear to migrate through the RMS. Conversely, both within the SVZa and along the RMS, the majority of SVZa‐derived cells encoding a dominant‐negative BMPR‐Ia gene do not express p19INK4d. These findings indicate that p19INK4d expression is suppressed when BMP signaling is inhibited. Furthermore, SVZa‐derived cells with both augmented and inhibited BMP signaling retain their neuronal commitment. Collectively, these studies have revealed that SVZa cell proliferation and differentiation is under the control of several interacting intrinsic and extrinsic factors. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

In this study we investigated whether the pattern of expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p19INK4d by the unique progenitor cells of the neonatal anterior subventricular zone (SVZa) can account for their ability to divide even though they express phenotypic characteristics of differentiated neurons. p19INK4d was chosen for analysis because it usually acts to block permanently the cell cycle at the G 1 phase. p19INK4d immunoreactivity and the incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) by SVZa cells were compared with that of the more typical progenitor cells of the prenatal telencephalic ventricular zone. In the developing telencephalon, p19INK4d is expressed by postmitotic cells and has a characteristic perinuclear distribution depending on the laminar position and state of differentiation of a cell. Moreover, the laminar-specific staining of the developing cerebral cortex revealed that the ventricular zone (VZ) is divided into p19INK4d (ϩ) and p19 INK4d (Ϫ) sublaminae, indicating that the VZ has a previously unrecognized level of functional organization. Furthermore, the rostral migratory stream, traversed by the SVZa-derived cells, exhibits an anterior high -posterior low gradient of p19 INK4d expression. On the basis of the p19INK4d immunoreactivity and BrdU incorporation, SVZa-derived cells appear to exit and reenter the cell cycle successively. Thus, in contrast to telencephalic VZ cells, SVZa cells continue to undergo multiple rounds of division and differentiation before becoming postmitotic.

The transcriptional programs of neural progenitor cells change dynamically during neurogenesis, a process regulated by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Although many of the transcription factors required for neuronal differentiation have long been identified, we are only at the brink of understanding how epigenetic mechanisms influence transcriptional activity and the accessibility of transcription factors to bind consensus cis-elements. Herein, we delineate the chief epigenetic modifications and the machinery responsible for these alterations. Further, we review the epigenetic modifications presently known to participate in the maintenance of the neural progenitor cell state and in the regulation of neuronal differentiation.