No abstract

INTRODUCTION Obesity has long been regarded as a risk factor for the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). It has been claimed that surgical efficacy of laparoscopic anti-reflux operations is decreased in obese patients. The aim of this study was to assess whether laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is effective in obese patients with GORD compared to non-obese patients. PATIENT AND METHODS A total of 366 patients (mean age 44 years; range, 12–86 years) underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery between 1997–2003. Of these, 74 patients were considered obese; 58 patients had a body mass index (BMI) of 30–34 kg/m2 and 16 were classified as morbidly obese with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Pre-operative symptomatic scoring, indications for surgery, pH studies, operative times and complications were compared between obese and non-obese patients. Symptomatic outcome and Visick score between the two groups were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year following surgery. RESULTS Failure of medical treatment was the main reason for surgery in all groups. Operative time was longer in obese patients (mean time 93 min compared to 81 min; P = 0.0007), the main difficulty being gaining access because of their body habitus. All groups found the procedure to be effective in symptomatic outcome, 91% of obese patients compared to 92% of non-obese patients scored Visick I or II at 6 weeks' postoperatively. Similar Visick scoring was shown between the two groups at 6 months and 1 year, and in the morbidly obese group. CONCLUSIONS The outcome of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is similar between obese and non-obese patients with no trend towards a worse outcome in the obese or morbidly obese. Obesity should not be seen as a contra-indication, although it may be more technically challenging in this group of patients. Good results can be achieved in obese patients.

Colorectal POSSUM provides comparable prediction of mortality risk after colorectal resection compared with POSSUM and P-POSSUM.

After a favorable trial period, we introduced the new percutaneous tracheostomy set, PercuTwist, in February of 2002 for our routine procedures. Over the next 20 mo, 90 procedures were performed with minimal complications. To prospectively evaluate this experience, we collected information on reasons for unit admission, operators' previous experience, the duration of prior tracheal intubation, the time needed for the procedure, the grading of the difficulty, the amount of bleeding, and the complications of the procedure. Twenty-two of 90 (24.4%) procedures were performed by senior consultants with experience; 68 of 90 (75.6%) were safely performed by intensive care residents under close bedside supervision. The mean time needed for the procedure was 13 min 7 s. In only one procedure during the entire study was any difficulty observed during the insertion process. This occurred because the initial skin incision was too small. However, no major bleeding or complications were encountered.

Colorectal subspecialisation has resulted in an increased use of pre-operative radiotherapy and fewer permanent stomas. No significant improvement in surgical or oncological outcomes after rectal cancer surgery have been observed.