DW MR imaging was better than standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging for FLL detection and was equal to breath-hold T2-weighted imaging for FLL characterization.

While nonenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic methods have been available since the earliest days of MR imaging, prolonged acquisition times and image artifacts have generally limited their use in favor of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiographic techniques. However, the combination of recent technical advances and new concerns about the safety of gadolinium-based contrast agents has spurred a resurgence of interest in methods that do not require exogenous contrast material. After a review of basic considerations in vascular imaging, the established methods for nonenhanced MR angiographic techniques, such as time of flight and phase contrast, are considered and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. This article then focuses on new techniques that are becoming commercially available, such as electrocardiographically gated partial-Fourier fast spin-echo methods and balanced steady-state free precession imaging both with and without arterial spin labeling. Challenges facing these methods and possible solutions are considered. Since different imaging techniques rely on different mechanisms of image contrast, recommendations are offered for which strategies may work best for specific angiographic applications. Developments on the horizon include techniques that provide time-resolved imaging for assessment of flow dynamics by using nonenhanced approaches.

Fat-saturated volumetric interpolated breath-hold images have quality comparable to that of conventional fat-saturated 2D GRE images.

Purpose:To assess the reproducibility and the distribution of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion-tensor (DT) imaging parameters in healthy renal cortex and medulla at baseline and after hydration or furosemide challenges. Materials and Methods:Using an institutional review board-approved HIPAAcompliant protocol with written informed consent, IVIM and DT imaging were performed at 3 T in 10 volunteers before and after water loading or furosemide administration. /msec, P = .0094). Urine output correlated with cortical ADC with furosemide (r = 0.7, P = .034) and with medullary l 1 (r = 0.83, P = .0418), l 2 (r = 0.85, P = .0301), and MD (r = 0.82, P = .045) with hydration. Conclusion:Diffusion MR metrics are sensitive to flow changes in kidney induced by diuretic challenges. The results of this study suggest that vascular flow, tubular dilation, water reabsorption, and intratubular flow all play important roles in diffusion-weighted imaging contrast.q RSNA, 2012

Preliminary findings suggest increased value for DK imaging compared with standard DW imaging in prostate cancer assessment.

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate sensitivity and specificity of various estimated perfusion parameters at three-dimensional (3D) perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the liver in the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis (stage >or= 3), with histologic analysis, liver function tests, or MR imaging as the reference standard. Whole-liver 3D perfusion MR imaging was performed in 27 patients (17 men, 10 women; mean age, 55 years) after dynamic injection of 8-10 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The following estimated perfusion parameters were measured with a dual-input single-compartment model: absolute arterial blood flow (F(a)), absolute portal venous blood flow (F(p)), absolute total liver blood flow (F(t)) (F(t) = F(a) + F(p)), arterial fraction (ART), portal venous fraction (PV), distribution volume (DV), and mean transit time (MTT) of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Patients were assigned to two groups (those with fibrosis stage or= 3), and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare F(a), F(p), F(t), ART, PV, DV, and MTT between groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the utility of perfusion estimates as predictors of advanced liver fibrosis. There were significant differences for all perfusion MR imaging-estimated parameters except F(p) and F(t). There was an increase in F(a), ART, DV, and MTT and a decrease in PV in patients with advanced fibrosis compared with those without advanced fibrosis. DV had the best performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.824, a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% confidence interval: 46.2%, 94.7%), and a specificity of 78.5% (95% confidence interval: 49.2%, 95.1%) in the prediction of advanced fibrosis.

DW imaging can be used to characterize renal lesions; however, compared with CE MR imaging, it is less accurate. DW imaging can be used to differentiate solid RCCs from oncocytomas and characterize the histologic subtypes of RCC.

No abstract