Programmed –1 ribosomal frameshift (–1 PRF) signals redirect translating ribosomes to slip back one base on messenger RNAs. Although well characterized in viruses, how these elements may regulate cellular gene expression is not understood. Here we describe a –1 PRF signal in the human mRNA encoding CCR5, the HIV-1 co-receptor. CCR5 mRNA-mediated –1 PRF is directed by an mRNA pseudoknot, and is stimulated by at least two microRNAs. Mapping the mRNA–miRNA interaction suggests that formation of a triplex RNA structure stimulates –1 PRF. A –1 PRF event on the CCR5 mRNA directs translating ribosomes to a premature termination codon, destabilizing it through the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway. At least one additional mRNA decay pathway is also involved. Functional –1 PRF signals that seem to be regulated by miRNAs are also demonstrated in mRNAs encoding six other cytokine receptors, suggesting a novel mode through which immune responses may be fine-tuned in mammalian cells.

No abstract

Significance Ribosomopathies are paradoxical: They first appear as diseases caused by too few cells but later present as diseases caused by too many. Here, we show that the presence of too few cells is caused by a quality control system that eliminates mutant ribosomes before they are allowed to translate mRNAs. Genetic suppression of this quality control system increases the amount of ribosomes available to cells. However, this 60S subunit deficiency results in release of defective ribosomes into the translationally active pool. A genetic model is presented describing how these types of defects may result in cancer, resolving the ribosomopathy paradox.

Adequate reprogramming of cellular metabolism in response to stresses or suboptimal growth conditions involves a myriad of coordinated changes that serve to promote cell survival. As protein synthesis is an energetically expensive process, its regulation under stress is of critical importance. Reprogramming of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation involves well‐understood stress‐activated kinases that target components of translation initiation machinery, resulting in the robust inhibition of general translation and promotion of the translation of stress‐responsive proteins. Translational arrest of mRNAs also results in the accumulation of transcripts in cytoplasmic foci called stress granules. Recent studies focus on the key roles of transfer RNA (tRNA) in stress‐induced translational reprogramming. These include stress‐specific regulation of tRNA pools, codon‐biased translation influenced by tRNA modifications, tRNA miscoding, and tRNA cleavage. In combination, signal transduction pathways and tRNA metabolism changes regulate translation during stress, resulting in adaptation and cell survival. This review examines molecular mechanisms that regulate protein synthesis in response to stress.

No abstract

Although first discovered in viruses, previous studies have identified operational −1 ribosomal frameshifting (−1 RF) signals in eukaryotic genomic sequences, and suggested a role in mRNA stability. Here, four yeast −1 RF signals are shown to promote significant mRNA destabilization through the nonsense mediated mRNA decay pathway (NMD), and genetic evidence is presented suggesting that they may also operate through the no-go decay pathway (NGD) as well. Yeast EST2 mRNA is highly unstable and contains up to five −1 RF signals. Ablation of the −1 RF signals or of NMD stabilizes this mRNA, and changes in −1 RF efficiency have opposing effects on the steady-state abundance of the EST2 mRNA. These results demonstrate that endogenous −1 RF signals function as mRNA destabilizing elements through at least two molecular pathways in yeast. Consistent with current evolutionary theory, phylogenetic analyses suggest that −1 RF signals are rapidly evolving cis-acting regulatory elements. Identification of high confidence −1 RF signals in ∼10% of genes in all eukaryotic genomes surveyed suggests that −1 RF is a broadly used post-transcriptional regulator of gene expression.

We have previously shown that ~10% of all eukaryotic mRNAs contain potential programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF) signals and that some function as mRNA destabilizing elements through the Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay (NMD) pathway by directing translating ribosomes to premature termination codons. Here, the connection between -1 PRF, NMD and telomere end maintenance are explored. Functional -1 PRF signals were identified in the mRNAs encoding two components of yeast telomerase, EST1 and EST2, and in mRNAs encoding proteins involved in recruiting telomerase to chromosome ends, STN1 and CDC13. All of these elements responded to mutants and drugs previously known to stimulate or inhibit -1 PRF, further supporting the hypothesis that they promote -1 PRF through the canonical mechanism. All affected the steady-state abundance of a reporter mRNA and the wide range of -1 PRF efficiencies promoted by these elements enabled the determination of an inverse logarithmic relationship between -1 PRF efficiency and mRNA accumulation. Steady-state abundances of the endogenous EST1, EST2, STN1 and CDC13 mRNAs were similarly inversely proportional to changes in -1 PRF efficiency promoted by mutants and drugs, supporting the hypothesis that expression of these genes is post-transcriptionally controlled by -1 PRF under native conditions. Overexpression of EST2 by ablation of -1 PRF signals or inhibition of NMD promoted formation of shorter telomeres and accumulation of large budded cells at the G2/M boundary. A model  is presented describing how limitation and maintenance of correct stoichiometries of telomerase components by -1 PRF is used to maintain yeast telomere length.

Reading frame maintenance is a critical property of ribosomes. However, a number of genetic elements have been described that can induce ribosomes to shift on mRNAs, the most well understood of which are a class that directs ribosomal slippage by one base in 5′ (-1) direction. This is referred to as programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF). Recently, a new -1 PRF promoting element was serendipitously discovered in a study examining the effects of stretches of adenosines in the coding sequences of mRNAs. Here, we discuss this finding, recent studies describing how -1 PRF is used to control gene expression in eukaryotes, and how -1 PRF is itself regulated. The implications of dysregulation of -1 PRF on human health are examined, as are possible new areas in which novel -1 PRF promoting elements might be discovered.