An extensive body of the literature shows a strong interrelationship between the pathogenic pathways of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and sarcopenia through the muscle-liver-adipose tissue axis. NAFLD is one of the leading causes of chronic liver diseases (CLD) affecting more than one-quarter of the general population worldwide. The disease severity spectrum ranges from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and its complications: end-stage chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Sarcopenia, defined as a progressive loss of the skeletal muscle mass, reduces physical performances, is associated with metabolic dysfunction and, possibly, has a causative role in NAFLD pathogenesis. Muscle mass is a key determinant of the whole-body insulin-mediated glucose metabolism and impacts fatty liver oxidation and energy homeostasis. These mechanisms drive the accumulation of ectopic fat both in the liver (steatosis, fatty liver) and in the muscle (myosteatosis). Myosteatosis rather than the muscle mass per se, seems to be closely associated with the severity of the liver injury. Sarcopenic obesity is a recently described entity which associates both sarcopenia and obesity and may trigger worse clinical outcomes including hepatic fibrosis progression and musculoskeletal disabilities. Furthermore, the muscle-liver-adipose tissue axis has a pivotal role in changes of the body composition, resulting in a distinct clinical phenotype that enables the identification of the “sarcopenic NAFLD phenotype.” This review aims to bring some light into the complex relationship between sarcopenia and NAFLD and critically discuss the key mechanisms linking NAFLD to sarcopenia, as well as some of the clinical consequences associated with the coexistence of these two entities: the impact of body composition phenotypes on muscle morphology, the concept of sarcopenic obesity, the relationship between sarcopenia and the severity of the liver damage and finally, the future directions and the existing gaps in the knowledge.

No abstract

Background and Aims Differences between countries in NAFLD patient care pathways and management need to be understood prior to defining supranational guidelines. Approach and Results We conducted an anonymous survey in France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Romania, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States among physicians providing specialist care for patients with NAFLD. Modalities of patient referral, patterns of practice (diagnosis, staging, monitoring, and indications for liver biopsy), therapeutic management, and expectations for future NASH pharmacotherapies were assessed, with 664 physicians completing the survey. Referral to surveyed physicians (SPs) mostly came from primary care. Prior to referral, NAFLD was rarely diagnosed, and noninvasive tests were not performed. Screening for comorbidities by SPs was incomplete and cardiovascular risk not calculated. Elastometry in combination with a serum biomarker was the most common first‐line method for fibrosis staging. Liver biopsy, when performed, was often delayed by at least 1 year after diagnosis. It was, however, recommended even if noninvasive methods indicated advanced fibrosis. Frequent, biannual monitoring was conducted, including HCC surveillance in Stage 3 fibrosis. SPs rarely implemented and followed dietary and lifestyle changes themselves, and local availability of such programs was highly heterogenous. SPs favored pharmacotherapy based on mechanism of action adapted to the stage of the disease, including for early stages such as steatohepatitis with mild fibrosis. Conclusions This international survey revealed major deficiencies and delays in referral pathways, suboptimal screening for comorbidities or managing of lifestyle modifications by SPs, and limited local availability for nonpharmacological interventions. Monitoring practices are not aligned with current guidelines.

Background Recently factors in the relationship between gut microbiota, obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome have been suggested in the development and progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). In this sense, this work aims to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation on intestinal microbiota modulation, degree of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, inflammation, gut permeability, and body composition. Methods This double-blind, randomized clinical trial will include adult outpatients with a diagnosis of NASH confirmed by biopsy with or without transient elastography. All patients will undergo a complete anamnesis to investigate their alcohol consumption, previous history, medications, nutritional assessment (dietary intake and body composition), sarcopenia, physical activity level and physical and functional capacity, cardiovascular risk, biochemical parameters for assessment of inflammatory status, lipid profile, hepatic function, gut permeability, and assessment of microbiota. These procedures will be performed at baseline and repeated after 24 weeks (at the end of the study). Through the process of randomization, patients will be allocated to receive treatment A or treatment B. Both patients and researchers involved will be blinded (double-blind study). The intervention consists of treatment with a probiotic mix (Lactobacillus acidophillus + Bifidobacterium lactis + Lactobacillus rhamnosus + Lactobacillus paracasei, 1 x 109 CFU for each) and the placebo which is identical in all its characteristics and packaging. Patients will be instructed to consume two sachets/day during 24 weeks and to report any symptoms or side effects related to the use of the sachets. Adherence control will be carried out through the patient’s notes on a form provided, and also by checking the number of sachets used. Discussion The final results of study will be analyzed and disseminated in 2020. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03467282. Registered on 15 March 2018.

No abstract