Consumers are increasingly demanding information regarding the characteristics of products, their place of origin and methods of production. A Geographical Indication (GI) can be understood as a way to meet these demands, as it protects the origin of the product, as well as its characteristics. In addition to contributing to territorial development, GI signs have the potential to add value to products and help producers to become more competitive. However, some authors argue that there are barriers that can prevent the benefits of GI from reaching producers. Therefore, this article aims to identify the barriers and benefits of GI for producers. To reach this end, a Systematic Literature Review was carried out. As a result, it was observed that among the main benefits offered by the GI are higher prices, access to markets and preservation of cultural identity. Regarding the challenges, it was highlighted the existence of inefficient institutions, organizational problems, power asymmetry and appropriation of value by the most powerful agents of the supply chain. To conclude, this paper shows that the difficulties and benefits of GI to producers are not absolute and vary from region to region. In this sense, further research on the impact of GI, especially in developing countries, is necessary. The results here presented may be used as a base for future research that search to identify the importance of GI for producers and may also contribute to the development of actions or public policies related to GI.
A Lei nº 11.947 de 2009 estabelece que 30% dos recursos destinados ao Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (PNAE) devem ser voltados à compra de produtos da agricultura familiar, sendo importante para a segurança alimentar e nutricional dos alunos e como canal de distribuição para os agricultores. Este artigo tem como objetivo avaliar o impacto da remuneração advinda do PNAE para os agricultores familiares do município de Tupã- SP. Para tanto, foram entrevistados 23 agricultores que participaram do PNAE neste locus e os dados foram trabalhados por meio de estatística descritiva, correlação linear de Pearson e Simulação de Monte Carlo. Os resultados indicam que 39,1% dos agricultores vendem entre R$15.001,00/ano a R$20.000,00/ano ao PNAE e que a participação no programa pode representar um crescimento de até 60,45% nos rendimentos totais. Logo, as informações levantadas nesse estudo podem contribuir para a decisão dos agricultores em participar ou não do programa, já que a adesão do PNAE pode demandar adequações no planejamento e na produção.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.