Conjugation is a key mechanism of bacterial evolution that involves mobile genetic elements. Recent findings indicated that the main actors of conjugative transfer are not the well-known conjugative or mobilizable plasmids but are the integrated elements. This paper reviews current knowledge on “integrative and mobilizable elements” (IMEs) that have recently been shown to be highly diverse and highly widespread but are still rarely described. IMEs encode their own excision and integration and use the conjugation machinery of unrelated co-resident conjugative element for their own transfer. Recent studies revealed a much more complex and much more diverse lifecycle than initially thought. Besides their main transmission as integrated elements, IMEs probably use plasmid-like strategies to ensure their maintenance after excision. Their interaction with conjugative elements reveals not only harmless hitchhikers but also hunters that use conjugative elements as target for their integration or harmful parasites that subvert the conjugative apparatus of incoming elements to invade cells that harbor them. IMEs carry genes conferring various functions, such as resistance to antibiotics, that can enhance the fitness of their hosts and that contribute to their maintenance in bacterial populations. Taken as a whole, IMEs are probably major contributors to bacterial evolution.

Integration of foreign DNA was observed in the Gram-positive human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) after transformation with DNA from a recombinant Escherichia coli bacteriophage carrying a pneumococcal insert. Segments of DNA replaced chromosomal sequences adjacent to the region homologous with the pneumococcal insert, whence the name insertion-deletion. Here we report that a pneumococcal insert was absolutely required for insertion-deletion formation, but could be as short as 153 bp; that the sizes of foreign DNA insertions (289 -2,474 bp) and concomitant chromosomal deletions (45-1,485 bp) were not obviously correlated; that novel joints clustered preferentially within segments of high GC content; and that the crossovers in 29 independent novel joints were located 1 bp from the border or within short (3-10 nt long) stretches of identity (microhomology) between resident and foreign DNA. The data are consistent with a model in which the insert serving as a homologous recombination anchor favors interaction and subsequent illegitimate recombination events at microhomologies between foreign and resident sequences. The potential of homologydirected illegitimate recombination for genome evolution was illustrated by the trapping of functional heterologous genes. G enetic transformation, which was discovered in the Grampositive Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) (1), is believed to play a central role in the biology of this human pathogen through its contribution to genetic plasticity (see ref.2 for a review). Transformation with naked DNA allows intraspecies and interspecies gene transfer. As such exchanges involve homologous recombination, they are generally ''conservative,'' i.e., they do not result in the creation of novel sequences but simply in a redistribution of previously existing genes. However, a pre-existing gene also can be modified when the two interacting sequences are partly divergent. Homologous recombination then leads to the production of mosaic genes, as exemplified in the case of the pbp genes of S. pneumoniae that encode altered penicillin-binding proteins with decreased affinity for ␤-lactam antibiotics (see ref. 3 for a review).Besides these conservative facets of transformation, is there any potential for the creation of novel sequence combinations or genes? The observation that transformation with chimeric donor DNA is mutagenic (4) suggested that shuffling and reassembly of previously unrelated sequences could readily occur in S. pneumoniae. The chimeric DNA extracted from a recombinant Escherichia coli bacteriophage carrying a pneumococcal insert produced illegitimate recombinants at a frequency of about 0.5% that of homologous recombinants (4). Illegitimate recombinants resulted from simultaneous insertion of heterologous vector (i.e., ) sequences and deletion of chromosomal sequences adjacent to the region homologous to the insert. These illegitimate events were therefore termed insertion-deletions (InsDels). As the pneumococcal insert in the chimeric donor seemed r...

Streptococcus suis is a zoonotic pathogen suspected to be a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. The genomes of 214 strains of 27 serotypes were screened for AMR genes and chromosomal Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs), in particular Integrative Conjugative Elements (ICEs) and Integrative Mobilizable Elements (IMEs). The functionality of two ICEs that host IMEs carrying AMR genes was investigated by excision tests and conjugation experiments. In silico search revealed 416 ICE-related and 457 IME-related elements. These MGEs exhibit an impressive diversity and plasticity with tandem accretions, integration of ICEs or IMEs inside ICEs and recombination between the elements. All of the detected 393 AMR genes are carried by MGEs. As previously described, ICEs are major vehicles of AMR genes in S. suis. Tn5252-related ICEs also appear to carry bacteriocin clusters. Furthermore, whereas the association of IME-AMR genes has never been described in S. suis, we found that most AMR genes are actually carried by IMEs. The autonomous transfer of an ICE to another bacterial species (Streptococcus thermophilus)—leading to the cis-mobilization of an IME carrying tet(O)—was obtained. These results show that besides ICEs, IMEs likely play a major role in the dissemination of AMR genes in S. suis.

BackgroundTwo closely related ICEs, ICESt1 and ICESt3, have been identified in the lactic acid bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. While their conjugation and recombination modules are almost identical (95% nucleotide identity) and their regulation modules related, previous work has demonstrated that transconjugants carrying ICESt3 were generated at rate exceeding by a 1000 factor that of ICESt1.ResultsThe functional regulation of ICESt1 and ICESt3 transcription, excision and replication were investigated under different conditions (exponential growth or stationary phase, DNA damage by exposition to mitomycin C). Analysis revealed an identical transcriptional organization of their recombination and conjugation modules (long unique transcript) whereas the transcriptional organization of their regulation modules were found to be different (two operons in ICESt1 but only one in ICESt3) and to depend on the conditions (promoter specific of stationary phase in ICESt3). For both elements, stationary phase and DNA damage lead to the rise of transcript levels of the conjugation-recombination and regulation modules. Whatever the growth culture conditions, excision of ICESt1 was found to be lower than that of ICESt3, which is consistent with weaker transfer frequencies. Furthermore, for both elements, excision increases in stationary phase (8.9-fold for ICESt1 and 1.31-fold for ICESt3) and is strongly enhanced by DNA damage (38-fold for ICESt1 and 18-fold for ICESt3). Although ICEs are generally not described as replicative elements, the copy number of ICESt3 exhibited a sharp increase (9.6-fold) after mitomycin C exposure of its harboring strain CNRZ385. This result was not observed when ICESt3 was introduced in a strain deriving ICESt1 host strain CNRZ368, deleted for this element. This finding suggests an impact of the host cell on ICE behavior.ConclusionsAll together, these results suggest a novel mechanism of regulation shared by ICESt1, ICESt3 and closely related ICEs, which we identified by analysis of recently sequenced genomes of firmicutes. This is the first report of a partial shutdown of the activity of an ICE executed by a strain belonging to its primary host species. The sharp increase of ICESt3 copy number suggests an induction of replication; such conditional intracellular replication may be common among ICEs.

The first processing event of the precursor ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA) takes place within the 5 external transcribed spacer. This primary processing requires conserved cis-acting RNA sequence downstream from the cleavage site and several nucleic acids (small nucleolar RNAs) and proteins trans-acting factors including nucleolin, a major nucleolar protein. The specific interaction of nucleolin with the pre-rRNA is required for processing in vitro. Xenopus laevis and hamster nucleolin interact with the same pre-rRNA site and stimulate the processing activity of a mouse cell extract. A highly conserved 11-nucleotide sequence located 5-6 nucleotides after the processing site is required for the interaction of nucleolin and processing. In vitro selection experiments with nucleolin have identified an RNA sequence that contains the UCGA motif present in the 11-nucleotide conserved sequence. The interaction of nucleolin with pre-rRNA is required for the formation of an active processing complex. Our findings demonstrate that nucleolin is a key factor for the assembly and maturation of pre-ribosomal ribonucleoparticles.Ribosome biogenesis is a complex process that involves the transcription of a large pre-rRNA 1 precursor, its maturation, and assembly with ribosomal proteins (1, 2). Pre-rRNA undergoes multiple post-transcriptional nucleotide modification (3) and nucleolytic processing steps to yield the mature 18, 5.8, and 28 S rRNA species. The two first endonucleolytic cleavages occur in external transcribed spacers (ETS) and therefore do not lead to the formation of mature rRNA ends. The first cleavage also called early or primary processing occurs within the 5Ј-ETS (4 -6) is conserved from yeast (7) to human (8) and can be found at various positions within the 5Ј-ETS (5, 7-11).Despite its conservation, the role of this cleavage in ribosome biogenesis is still unknown, and only few factors involved in this process have been characterized. In yeast, the role of Rnt1p, an RNase III homologue remains unclear (12, 13). In higher eukaryotes, the major nucleolar protein nucleolin (15), an endonuclease (14) and several small nucleolar RNA are also involved (15, 16), but their exact function remains to be elucidated. In vitro UV cross-linking has identified a small number of proteins, including nucleolin, that interact with the RNA substrate (17, 18). The different factors assemble in a large 20 S complex (18) that could be visualized at the terminal ends of nascent pre-rRNA (terminal balls) observed on Miller's Christmas tree by electron microscopy (19,20). The formation of this complex seems necessary but not sufficient for processing (20,21).The sequence and RNA structural motif required for the processing have been extensively studied in vitro (21,22). In mouse pre-rRNA, an evolutionary conserved 11-nt motif (ϩ655 to ϩ666) located just 5-6 nt downstream from the cleavage site is absolutely required for the processing (21) and for formation of the complex observed at the 5Ј end of nascent pre-rRNA (20). A 27-nt RNA (ϩ645 to ϩ...

The SopA protein plays an essential, though so far undefined, role in partition of the mini‐F plasmid but, when overproduced, it causes loss of mini‐F from growing cells. Our investigation of this phenomenon has revealed that excess SopA protein reduces the linking number of mini‐F. It appears to do so by disturbing the partition complex, in which SopB normally introduces local positive supercoiling upon binding to the sopC centromere, as it occurs only in plasmids carrying sopC and in the presence of SopB protein. SopA‐induced reduction in linking number is not associated with altered sop promoter activity or levels of SopB protein and occurs in the absence of changes in overall supercoil density. SopA protein mutated in the ATPase nucleotide‐binding site (K120Q) or lacking the presumed SopB interaction domain does not induce the reduction in linking number, suggesting that excess SopA disrupts the partition complex by interacting with SopB to remove positive supercoils in an ATP‐dependent manner. Destabilization of mini‐F also depends on sopC and SopB, but the K120Q mutant retains some capacity for destabilizing mini‐F. SopA‐induced destabilization thus appears to be complex and may involve more than one SopA activity. The results are interpreted in terms of a regulatory role for SopA in the oligomerization of SopB dimers bound to the centromere.

No abstract

Streptococcus suis is a zoonotic pathogen causing important economic losses in swine production. The most commonly used antibiotics in swine industry are tetracyclines, beta-lactams, and macrolides. Resistance to these antibiotics has already been observed worldwide (reaching high rates for macrolides and tetracyclines) as well as resistance to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, amphenicols, and glycopeptides. Most of the resistance mechanisms are encoded by antibiotic resistance genes, and a large part are carried by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that can be transferred through horizontal gene transfer. This review provides an update of the resistance genes, their combination in multidrug isolates, and their localization on MGEs in S. suis. It also includes an overview of the contribution of biofilm to antimicrobial resistance in this bacterial species. The identification of resistance genes and study of their localization in S. suis as well as the environmental factors that can modulate their dissemination appear essential in order to decipher the role of this bacterium as a reservoir of antibiotic genes for other species.