This paper considers a possibility to obtain high-quality butt junctions of bimetallic sheets from steel clad with a layer of titanium, with the use of barrier layers. The task that was tackled related to preventing the formation of Ti-Fe intermetallic phases (IMPs) between the steel and titanium layer. The barrier layers (height ~0.5 mm) of vanadium and copper alloys were surfaced by arc techniques while minimizing the level of thermal influence on the base metal. To this end, plasma surfacing with a current-driving wire and pulsed MAG surfacing were used. The obtained samples were examined by methods of metallography, X-ray spectral microanalysis, durometric analysis. It has been established that when a layer of vanadium is plated on the surface of titanium, a defect-free structure of variable composition (53.87–65.67) wt % Ti with (33.93–45.54) wt % V is formed without IMPs. The subsequent surfacing of steel on a layer of vanadium leads to the formation of eutectics (hardness up to 5,523 MPa) in the fusion zone, as well as to the evolution of cracks. To prevent the formation of IMPs, a layer of bronze CuBe2 was deposited on the surface of vanadium. The formed layer contributed to the formation of a grid of hot cracks. In the titanium-vanadium-copper transition zones (0.1–0.2 mm wide), a fragile phase was observed. To eliminate this drawback, the bronze CuBe2 was replaced with bronze CuSi3Mn1; a defect-free junction was obtained. When using a barrier layer with CuSi3Mn1, a defect-free junction was obtained (10–30 % Ti; 18–50 % Fe; 5–25 % Cu). The study reported here makes it possible to recommend CuSi3Mn1 as a barrier layer for welding bimetallic sheets "steel-titanium". One of the applications of the research results could be welding of longitudinally welded pipes of main oil and gas pipelines formed from bimetallic sheets of steel clad with titanium.
Risk-based approaches are a feature of the modern quality management system. A method of optimization of product quality inspection plan by the risk of non-conformity slippage is proposed. The method is based on a risk ranking matrix, criteria of the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), block classification of inspection plans, approaches to non-conformity prediction, and probability multiplication theorem for independent events. The risk of non-conformity slippage was defined as a criterion of inspection plan optimization. The proposed method allows determining the acceptability of the risk, with 100 % quality inspection, in case of abandoning the inspection operation, the possibility of applying sampling and minimum sampling volumes necessary to ensure an acceptable risk level. Relationships were derived to determine the minimum required number of inspected units out of 1,000, with an acceptable risk level in product quality inspection. The initial data for the calculation are the main characteristics of the inspection plan: the probability of the object conformity with the requirements for the controlled quality characteristic, the probability of not detecting non-conformity with the provided inspection method, the rate of non-conformity slippage, which ensures an acceptable risk level. The formula allows calculating the minimum sampling volume that provides an acceptable level of non-conformity slippage risk during the implementation of the product quality inspection plan (QIP). The proposed method was tested on the inspection plan for welds of air tanks of the railway car braking system. It is possible to abandon the original 100 % inspection plan and apply sampling, which provides an acceptable level of non-conformity slippage risk. This allows reducing the volume and costs of inspection by 18 %
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.