The purpose of this study was to determine whether changes in human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA prevalence in oral rinses and/or HPV-specific antibody levels in the sera of patients with oral/oropharyngeal cancer have prognostic significance. One hundred and forty-two patients with oral/oropharyngeal tumors were enrolled. The presence of HPV DNA was assayed in tumor tissue and oral rinses and HPV-specific antibodies were assessed in the sera. Oral rinses were collected before treatment and one year after the treatment. Sera were drawn before treatment, one month, and one year after the end of the treatment. Altogether, 59.2% of tumors were HPV positive. The presence of HPV DNA in the tumors correlated with HPV DNA positivity in oral rinses and with HPV-specific antibodies in the sera. Out of 66 patients with HPV-positive oral rinses at enrolment, 84.8% became negative at one-year follow-up, while most patients remained seropositive for HPV-specific antigens. However, the mean titers of HPV16 E6 and/or E7 antibodies at follow-up were significantly lower. Of 16 patients with recurrences at followup (alive on second sampling), six were positive at enrolment for HPV16 E6 and/or E7 antibodies. In five of these, no decrease in antibody levels was observed. Titers of antibodies specific for HPV16 capsid antigens did not change during the follow-up. Our data suggest that the detection of antibodies specific for the HPV 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins may serve not only as a marker of HPV etiology, but also as a marker of recurrence and a prognostic indicator in patients with HPV-positive tumors.Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) accounts annually for 7% of all new cancer cases worldwide. 1 SCCHN presents as a single clinical and pathological entity, yet studies conducted over the past 15 years have revealed that it has two distinct etiologies. Most SCCHN cases, particularly those located in the oral cavity, larynx, and hypopharynx, are apparently independent of viral infection, and often associated with tobacco and alcohol use. However, 26% of all SCCHN cases, and over 70% of those found in the tonsillar area and oropharynx, are associated with the presence and expression of mucosal high-risk (oncogenic) human papillomavirus (HR HPV) genomes. [2][3][4] HR HPVs cause cervical cancer and other neoplasms of the anogenital skin and mucosae. 5,6 The most common genital mucosal HR HPV type 16, is found in 95% of HPVpositive SCCHN lesions. 7,8 Although patients with HR HPVassociated SCCNH often present with more advanced disease, we and others have shown that these patients have a remarkably better prognosis and five-year survival rate. 2,9-11 The prognostic advantage of patients with SCCHN etiologically linked to HR HPV could potentially lead to modified treatment regimens. Therefore, noninvasive or less invasive sampling procedures to identify patients with HPV-positive tumors were evaluated in several studies including ours. 12-16It has been demonstrated that the presence of HPV DNA in oral rinses or saliva as well...
The association of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR HPVs) with tonsillar cancer (TC) has been documented. Because patients with HPV-associated tumors show better survival rates, modification of their treatment regimen is being considered. It is therefore crucial to find markers for the identification of patients whose tumors are linked to viral infection. A cohort of 109 patients with primary TC was screened for HPV DNA presence in the tumor tissues and HPV-specific antibodies in sera. Data regarding risk factors and clinical parameters were collected. Forty-five specimens were analyzed for the expression of viral E6 and E2-region mRNA, and the p16 and p53 protein expression status was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The overall prevalence of HPV DNA in TC tissues was 65.1%. Ninety-three percent of HR HPV DNA-positive samples expressed E6*I mRNA. E2-region mRNA expression was detected in 36% of positive samples, which implies that the virus is integrated in 64% of HPV DNA/RNA-positive tumors. p16 overexpression and the presence of antibodies specific to HPV16 E6/E7 oncoproteins correlated well with HPV DNA and RNA presence. The disease-specific survival rate of patients with HPV DNApositive tumors was significantly higher than that of HPV DNA-negative patients. In addition to providing further evidence of the involvement of HPV infection in the etiopathogenesis of a proportion of TC cases, our study demonstrates that p16 immunostaining and anti-E6/E7 antibodies as surrogate markers of HPV involvement represent specific, sensitive and clinically accessible assays for the identification of TC patients who have a considerably better prognosis.Recent studies have shown that 20-25% of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs) appear to be causally linked with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) infection.
Therapeutic vaccines against tumors associated with human papillomaviruses (HPV) should elicit cellular immune responses against early HPV antigens, primarily the oncoproteins E7 and E6. Because of safety concerns, the direct use of an unmodified oncogene is impossible in human DNA vaccination. Therefore, we introduced three point mutations into the pRb-binding site of HPV16 E7 oncogene to eliminate its transformation potential. The resultant gene was denoted E7GGG. The rates of expression and the cellular localization of E7 and E7GGG proteins were comparable. In immunization-challenge experiments, the efficacy of plasmids containing the E7, E7GGG, or fusion genes of HPV16 E7, viz. L1DeltaCE7(1-60) (M. Muller et al., 1997, Virology 234, 93-111), and Sig/E7/LAMP-1 (T. C. Wu et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11671-11675), was compared. While tumors developed in all animals immunized with the wild-type E7 gene, a significant proportion of mice remained tumor-free after vaccination with the E7GGG gene. The fusion gene L1DeltaCE7(1-60) induced negligible protection, but Sig/E7/LAMP-1 conferred the highest protection. Intradermal immunization by gene gun proved superior to i.m. inoculation. In "therapeutic" experiments, a 1-day delay between inoculation of oncogenic cells and the start of DNA immunization resulted in partial therapeutic effect, but a 3-day delay produced a substantially lower immunization effect. A combination of Sig/E7/LAMP-1 and E7GGG genes did not enhance the immune response. These results demonstrate a significant enhancement of HPV16 E7 immunogenicity after mutagenesis of the pRb-binding site, but the mutated E7 gene did not excel the Sig/E7/LAMP-1 fusion gene.
The association between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the development of head and neck cancer has been documented recently. In this study on 86 head and neck cancer patients and 124 controls, data regarding demographics, behavioral risk factors, and risks related to HPV exposure were collected. HPV detection was carried out using polymerase chain reaction in the tumors and in oral exfoliated cells, and HPV typing by a reverse line blot assay specific for 37 HPV types. Sera were tested by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for HPV proteins. Head and neck cancer cases report significantly more oral-anal contact (P = 0.02) and tobacco and alcohol use than controls (P = 0.001; P = 0.02, respectively). High-risk HPV DNA was detected in 43% of oral washings of cases and 4% of controls (P < 0.0001). The association between the presence of high-risk HPV DNA in oral exfoliated cells and in tumor tissues was statistically significant (adjusted P < 0.0001). The prevalence of HPV-specific antibodies was significantly higher in cases than in controls (adjusted P < 0.0001). These results provide epidemiological and immunological evidence for HR HPV as a strong risk factor (OR = 44.3, P < 0.0001) for head and neck cancer, even after controlling for age, tobacco and alcohol use. The detection of high-risk HPV DNA in oral exfoliated cells and HPV-specific antibodies in serum can be considered as clinically relevant surrogate markers for the presence of a HPV-associated head and neck cancer, with a high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (88%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.