From January 1990 to December 1992, ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli was isolated in 125 of 1,946 urine cultures (6.4%) with more than 10(5) colony-forming units per ml. To determine the risk factors for acquisition of urinary tract infections caused by ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli a retrospective chart review was done. Data from 54 patients with urinary tract infections caused by ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli were compared with 51 controls matched by temporal occurrence and randomly selected among 540 patients with urinary tract infections caused by ciprofloxacin susceptible E. coli. Patients had greater proportions of asymptomatic bacteriuria or lower urinary tract symptoms (85% versus 61%, p = 0.01) and of relapse (22% versus 0%, p = 0.001) than controls. Urinary tract abnormalities (odds ratio 7.98, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 3.1, p < 0.001), patient age 65 years or older (odds ratio 6.48, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 19.1, p < 0.001), previous treatment with quinolones (odds ratio 19.09, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 166.5, p = 0.008) and urinary catheterization (odds ratio 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 8.5, p = 0.048) were independently associated with infections caused by ciprofloxacin resistant strains. Our results suggest that patients with urological abnormalities previously treated with quinolones are especially prone to urinary tract infection caused by ciprofloxacin resistant strains.

No abstract

Background Performance of point-of-care tests in different clinical scenarios and on different samples remains undetermined. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of the nasopharyngeal Panbio COVID-19 antigen Rapid-Test-Device. Method Prospective study including consecutive patients attending three primary care centers (PCC) and an emergency department. The antigen test was performed at point-of-care in nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs, and in saliva. Positive and negative percent agreement (PPA, NPA) were calculated with the RT-PCR assay as reference standard. Results Of 913 patients included, 296 (32.3%) were asymptomatic and 690 (75.6%) came from the PCC. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 913, nasal swabs from 659, and saliva from 611 patients. RT-PCR was positive in 196 (21.5%) nasopharyngeal samples (NPS). Overall PPA (95% CI) in NPS was 60.5% (53.3-67.4), and it was lower in nasal swabs (44.7%) and saliva (23.1%). Test performance in NPS was largely dependent on the cycle threshold (Ct) in RT-PCR, with PPA of 94% for Ct≤25 and 80% for Ct&lt;30. In symptomatic patients, the PPA was 95% for Ct≤25; 85% for Ct&lt;30, and 89% for the symptom triad of fever, cough and malaise. Performance was also dependent on age, with PPA of 100% in symptomatic patients &gt;50 years with Ct&lt;25. In asymptomatic patients, the PPA was 86% for Ct&lt;25. In all cases, NPA was 100%. Conclusion The nasopharyngeal Panbio COVID-19 antigen test performed at point-of-care has a good sensitivity in symptomatic patients with Ct&lt;30 and older age. The test was useful to identify asymptomatic patients with lower Ct values.

No abstract

Data assessing the diagnostic accuracies of use of different respiratory samples for the detection of the novel influenza A/H1N1 2009 virus by molecular methods are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of combined nose and throat swabs (CNTS) with that of nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA). This was a prospective study of adults and children with suspected influenza. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR testing was used for the virological diagnosis. Of the 2,473 patients included, 264 with paired CNTS and NPA were randomly selected. Novel influenza A/H1N1 virus was identified in at least one sample for 115 (43.6%) patients, the majority of them young adults. In 109 patients (94.8%) the virus was identified in the CNTS, and in 98 (85.2%) it was identified in the NPA (P ‫؍‬ 0.02). In 93 patients (80.1%), the virus was identified in both specimens. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.82 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in accuracy between the specimens when patients were stratified according to demographic or clinical characteristics except in the case of women, in whom the sensitivity of CNTS was higher (P ‫؍‬ 0.01). The combination of CNTS and NPA had a significantly higher sensitivity in identifying the virus than did each method alone (P ‫؍‬ 0.02 for the comparison of the combination of both sampling methods with CNTS, and P < 0.001 for the comparison with NPA). We conclude that in patients with the novel influenza A/H1N1 virus, the diagnostic yield of CNTS is higher than that of NPA. The combination of both sampling methods increases the likelihood of diagnosing the virus.

Paecilomyces lilacinus is an emerging fungal pathogen that is highly resistant to many antifungal drugs. Skin and subcutaneous soft tissue infections caused by this organism are very unusual. Most cases occur in patients with impaired host defenses or following surgical procedures. There has been only one previous report of a histologically confirmed cutaneous infection due to Paecilomyces lilacinus in a patient without predisposing factors. Described here is the second histopathologically proven case of Paecilomyces lilacinus cutaneous infection in a healthy patient without any apparent portal of entry. Prolonged antifungal chemotherapy with itraconazole led to resolution of the skin lesion. This case of sporadic cutaneous infection due to Paecilomyces lilacinus is believed to be the first reported in Europe and the first histopathologically proven case successfully treated with itraconazole.

No abstract

No abstract