Microaggressions are subtle forms of discrimination, often unintentional and unconscious, which send negative and denigrating messages to various individuals and groups. Previous literature has focused on microaggressions of singular identities, with little attention to the impacts of intersectional microaggressions (i.e., subtle forms of discrimination that may be influenced by more than 1 identity). The current study utilized a unique qualitative technique to address 2 central goals: (a) to explore whether qualitative analysis is an effective way to examine intersectional microaggressions and (b) to examine whether people with multiple identities could identify intersectional microaggressions in their everyday lives. Utilizing Qualitative Secondary Analysis (QSA) and Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) methods, the researchers analyzed data from 6 previous qualitative studies with self-identified lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, women, Filipino Americans, multiracial people, and Muslims (N ϭ 80). Sample themes include (a) Exoticization of Women of Color, (b) Disapproval of LGBT Identity by Racial, Ethnic, and Religious Groups, (c) Assumptions of Inferiority or Criminality of Men of Color, and (d) Gender-Based Stereotypes of Muslim Men and Women. Implications for psychology (particularly for research and practice) are discussed. Finally, the authors advocate for the use of secondary analysis of qualitative data, to understand concepts that would not have been studied or reported through a singular qualitative analysis.
Women veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) experience a myriad of traumatic stressors, including high rates of Military Sexual Trauma (MST). Furthermore, there is an upsurge in combat exposure, length and number of deployments, and/or perceived personal danger in these eras compared to women veterans of previous eras. These stressors can increase the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Women veterans with combat exposure and/or MST experience PTSD differently than civilian women or military men, and therefore may require tailored and integrative treatments. Interventions that focus on resiliency and posttraumatic growth (PTG) may help decrease symptom presentation, increase quality of life, and reduce the utilization/cost of care. Moreover, resiliency-based interventions could offer a recovery-oriented framework that reinforces positive psychology constructs that may promote growth following trauma. To investigate these concepts, we interviewed four women from the OEF/OIF/OND eras who have experienced MST and/or received a diagnosis of PTSD. We explored four major areas: experiences of life after military, impact of trauma on factors that influence resiliency, helpful and unhelpful interventions for trauma recovery, and the concepts of resiliency and posttraumatic growth. These women generally felt a sense of lost identity following trauma and in post-military life, and they expressed a desire for therapy groups to support and foster connections to women with similar experiences. We also observed that they had a general understanding of resilience but lacked in-depth knowledge as it could apply to trauma recovery and welcomed opportunities to learn these skills in group settings.
Ethnographic data collected on 9 Black, male, West Indian‐American youths yielded themes and rudimentary guides for the subsequent collection of a second set of data. Culturally relevant factors for counseling these youngsters were extricated from quasi‐structured interviews conducted with the original 9 students, an additional 6 high school students, and 11 counselors. The major findings indicate that these students have strong taboos against seeking counseling. Also, their cultural background affects their career choices, and their biculturism induces conflict within their families. Implications for counseling are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.