BackgroundThe prevalence of diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa has increased rapidly over the last years. Self-management is a key element for the proper management, but strategies are currently lacking in this context. This systematic review aims to describe the level of self-management among persons living with type 2 diabetes mellitus in sub-Saharan Africa.MethodRelevant databases including PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2016. Studies reporting self-management behavior of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and living in sub-Saharan Africa were included.ResultsA total of 550 abstracts and 109 full-text articles were assessed. Forty-three studies, mainly observational, met the inclusion criteria. The studies showed that patients rarely self-monitored their glucose levels, had low frequency/duration of physical activity, moderately adhered to recommended dietary and medication behavior, had poor level of knowledge regarding diabetes related complications and sought traditional or herbal medicines beside of their biomedical treatment. The analysis also revealed a lack of studies on psychosocial aspects.ConclusionExcept for the psychosocial area, there is a good amount of recent studies on self-management behavior of type 2 diabetes mellitus sub-Saharan Africa. These studies indicate that self-management in sub-Saharan Africa is poor and therefore a serious threat to the health of individuals and the health systems capacity.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6050-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundThe prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, the use of mobile phones is rising, expanding the opportunities for the implementation of mobile phone-based health (mHealth) interventions. This review aims to understand how, why, for whom, and in what circumstances mHealth interventions against NCDs improve treatment and care in sub-Saharan Africa.MethodsFour main databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) and references of included articles were searched for studies reporting effects of mHealth interventions on patients with NCDs in sub-Saharan Africa. All studies published up until May 2015 were included in the review. Following a realist review approach, middle-range theories were identified and integrated into a Framework for Understanding the Contribution of mHealth Interventions to Improved Access to Care for patients with NCDs in sub-Saharan Africa. The main indicators of the framework consist of predisposing characteristics, needs, enabling resources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Studies were analyzed in depth to populate the framework.ResultsThe search identified 6137 titles for screening, of which 20 were retained for the realist synthesis. The contribution of mHealth interventions to improved treatment and care is that they facilitate (remote) access to previously unavailable (specialized) services. Three contextual factors (predisposing characteristics, needs, and enabling resources) influence if patients and providers believe that mHealth interventions are useful and easy to use. Only if they believe mHealth to be useful and easy to use, will mHealth ultimately contribute to improved access to care. The analysis of included studies showed that the most important predisposing characteristics are a positive attitude and a common language of communication. The most relevant needs are a high burden of disease and a lack of capacity of first-contact providers. Essential enabling resources are the availability of a stable communications network, accessible maintenance services, and regulatory policies.ConclusionsPolicy makers and program managers should consider predisposing characteristics and needs of patients and providers as well as the necessary enabling resources prior to the introduction of an mHealth intervention. Researchers would benefit from placing greater attention on the context in which mHealth interventions are being implemented instead of focusing (too strongly) on the technical aspects of these interventions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0782-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundThe reasons of deaths in developing countries are shifting from communicable diseases towards non-communicable diseases (NCDs). At the same time the number of health care interventions using mobile phones (mHealth interventions) is growing rapidly. We review studies assessing the health-related impacts of mHealth on NCDs in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs).MethodsA systematic literature search of three major databases was performed in order to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mHealth interventions. Identified studies were reviewed concerning key characteristics of the trial and the intervention; and the relationship between intervention characteristics and outcomes was qualitatively assessed.ResultsThe search algorithms retrieved 994 titles. 8 RCTs were included in the review, including a total of 4375 participants. Trials took place mostly in urban areas, tested different interventions (ranging from health promotion over appointment reminders and medication adjustments to clinical decision support systems), and included patients with different diseases (diabetes, asthma, hypertension). Except for one study all showed rather positive effects of mHealth interventions on reported outcome measures.Furthermore, our results suggest that particular types of mHealth interventions that were found to have positive effects on patients with communicable diseases and for improving maternal care are likely to be effective also for NCDs.ConclusionsDespite rather positive results of included RCTs, a firm conclusion about the effectiveness of mHealth interventions against NCDs is not yet possible because of the limited number of studies, the heterogeneity of evaluated mHealth interventions and the wide variety of reported outcome measures. More research is needed to better understand the specific effects of different types of mHealth interventions on different types of patients with NCDs in LaMICs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3226-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Es ist wichtig, dass künftig erreichbare Ziele und einheitliche Standards definiert und vorhandene Ressourcen zielführend zum IT-Ausbau eingesetzt werden. Nur durch die Schaffung grundlegender IT-Strukturen können neue Technologien implementiert und nachhaltig genutzt werden. Digitalisation is finding its way into German hospitals. However, the level of information technology (IT) utilisation remains unclear. Therefore, this paper analyses the degree of digitalisation of German hospitals from an international perspective. For this purpose, the logic of the "Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model" (EMRAM) is used, which rates hospitals on a scale from 0 (no digitalisation) to 7 (paperless hospital). According to the EMRAM logic, German hospitals achieve an average value of 2.3 and are therefore digitised only below average compared to other countries. The gap to the European average (3.6) has also widened in recent years. Countries such as Turkey (3.8) or the USA (5.3) are much more advanced. Currently, there is not a single hospital at Level 7 in Germany. Other evaluation methods, such as the "European Hospital Survey", confirm the results of EMRAM and show that Germany is increasingly losing ground in the digital field. The reasons for this poor balance include a lack of investment, data protection concerns, the user-unfriendliness of the IT systems used and the sluggish broadband expansion in Germany. It is important to define achievable goals and to use existing resources carefully for IT expansion. Only by creating uniform standards and a reliable IT infrastructure, new technologies can be implemented sustainably. Open Access Dieses Kapitel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz(http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de) veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Kapitel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen.

In Germany, some digital health applications (DiHA) became reimbursable through the statutory health insurance system with the adoption of the Digital Healthcare Act in 2019. Approaches and concepts for the German care context were developed in an iterative process, based on existing concepts from international experience. A DiHA categorization was developed that could be used as a basis to enable the creation of a reimbursed DiHA repository, and to derive evidence requirements for coverage and reimbursement for each DiHA. The results provide an overview of a possible classification of DiHA as well as approaches to assessment and evaluation. The structure of remuneration and pricing in connection with the formation of groups is demonstrated.

No abstract

Background: Diagnosis-related Group (DRG-) based hospital payment can potentially be inadequately low (or high) for highly variable, highly specialized, and/or low volume care. DRG-based payment can be combined with other payment mechanisms to avoid unintended consequences of inadequate payment. The aim of this study was to analyze these other payment mechanisms for acute inpatient care across six countries (Germany, Denmark, England, Estonia, France, USA [Medicare]). Methods: Information was collected about elements excluded from DRG-based payment, the rationale for exclusions, and payment mechanisms complementing DRG-based payment. A conceptual framework was developed to systematically describe, visualise and compare payment mechanisms across countries. Results: Results show that the complexity of exclusion mechanisms and associated additional payment components differ across countries. England and Germany use many different additional mechanisms, while there are only few exceptions from DRG-based payment in the Medicare program in the USA. Certain areas of care are almost always excluded (e.g. certain areas of cancer care or specialized pediatrics). Denmark and England use exclusion mechanisms to steer service provision for highly complex patients to specialized providers. Conclusion: Implications for researchers and policy-makers include: (1) certain areas of care might be better excluded from DRG-based payment; (2) exclusions may be used to incentivize the concentration of highly specialized care at specialized institutions (as in Denmark or England); (3) researchers may apply our analytical framework to better understand the specific design features of DRG-based payment systems.

Background Cervical cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most frequent cancer in women in many low-income countries.Tanzania implemented a national HPV vaccination program in 2018 using a two-dose quadrivalent HPV vaccine. This study aimed to (1) estimate financial and economic costs of a two-dose vaccination program based on experiences with the national vaccination program, (2) estimate costs of a one-dose vaccination schedule to enable future cost-effectiveness analyses, and (3) assess the effect of alternative assumptions for future vaccination coverage rates on estimated costs of vaccination. Methods The WHO Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Costing (C4P) tool was used to estimate the incremental costs of the national vaccination programme from the perspective of the Tanzanian government using data collected via surveys, workshops, and interviews with local stakeholders. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate the effect of alternative assumptions for coverage rates and delivery strategies and to assess the impact of a potential one-dose vaccination schedule. Results The total financial and economic costs were US$10,117,455 and US$45,683,204, respectively, at a financial cost of $5.17 per two-dose fully immunized girl (FIG), and an economic cost of $23.34 per FIG. Under the assumption of a one-dose vaccination schedule, costs per FIG would reduce to financial costs of $2.51 and economic costs of $12.18. Conclusions The overall cost of Tanzania’s HPV vaccination program was lower per vaccinee than previous demonstration projects in the region suggest. These data provide important baseline data for Tanzania’s HPV vaccination program to date and may serve as a guide for improving coverage going forward. The findings may also aid in the prioritization of funding for countries that have not yet added HPV vaccines to their routine immunizations. Key messages • If a single dose regimen were found to be as effective as a two-dose series, it would result in significant cost savings as well as an increase in the number of girls that could be reached. • School-based vaccinations resulted in the lowest price per fully immunized girl, but other settings are needed to achieve equitable high coverage of HPV vaccination in Tanzania.