A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

BackgroundThe prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, the use of mobile phones is rising, expanding the opportunities for the implementation of mobile phone-based health (mHealth) interventions. This review aims to understand how, why, for whom, and in what circumstances mHealth interventions against NCDs improve treatment and care in sub-Saharan Africa.MethodsFour main databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) and references of included articles were searched for studies reporting effects of mHealth interventions on patients with NCDs in sub-Saharan Africa. All studies published up until May 2015 were included in the review. Following a realist review approach, middle-range theories were identified and integrated into a Framework for Understanding the Contribution of mHealth Interventions to Improved Access to Care for patients with NCDs in sub-Saharan Africa. The main indicators of the framework consist of predisposing characteristics, needs, enabling resources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Studies were analyzed in depth to populate the framework.ResultsThe search identified 6137 titles for screening, of which 20 were retained for the realist synthesis. The contribution of mHealth interventions to improved treatment and care is that they facilitate (remote) access to previously unavailable (specialized) services. Three contextual factors (predisposing characteristics, needs, and enabling resources) influence if patients and providers believe that mHealth interventions are useful and easy to use. Only if they believe mHealth to be useful and easy to use, will mHealth ultimately contribute to improved access to care. The analysis of included studies showed that the most important predisposing characteristics are a positive attitude and a common language of communication. The most relevant needs are a high burden of disease and a lack of capacity of first-contact providers. Essential enabling resources are the availability of a stable communications network, accessible maintenance services, and regulatory policies.ConclusionsPolicy makers and program managers should consider predisposing characteristics and needs of patients and providers as well as the necessary enabling resources prior to the introduction of an mHealth intervention. Researchers would benefit from placing greater attention on the context in which mHealth interventions are being implemented instead of focusing (too strongly) on the technical aspects of these interventions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0782-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A roadmap for the implementation of mHealth innovations for image-based diagnostic support in clinical and public-health settings: a focus on front-line health workers and health-system organizations

“…Some of them cover a wide span of applications (the bulk of which remain behavioural ones) [7] and others have a more specific focus, like those related to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [8]. Studies are reviewed for their theoretical underpinning, their methodological qualities, the state of advancement of the ‘solution’ proposed and their actual results.…”

“…Studies are reviewed for their theoretical underpinning, their methodological qualities, the state of advancement of the ‘solution’ proposed and their actual results. There is a general sense that there is an increasing gap between what could be an interesting mHealth application (pilots) and what actually is implemented and sustained; the criticism as to how research helps understand this gap is severe [7,8]. Understanding how, why, for whom and in what circumstances mHealth interventions improve treatment and care is important [8].…”

“…Government policy is necessary to ensure regulations uphold data security and privacy while also creating a suitable environment to facilitate mHealth innovation and implementation. A review of studies on mHealth apps for NCDs clearly reveals that regulatory policies rank among the three most important enabling factors of their implementation alongside the availability of a stable communications network and accessible maintenance services [8]. Indeed, as health practitioners around the world begin to embrace mobile health opportunities, regulatory frameworks must develop further.…”

Health systems readiness for adopting mhealth interventions for addressing non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a current debate

“…The perceived benefits of mobile phone-based health interventions carry a great potential for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in resource-constrained LMICs [15,16]. A wide range of mobile-based interventions exists for preventing and controlling NCDs.…”

Institutionalizing human-computer interaction for global health

“…In rural areas, it may be possible to take pictures and communicate remotely, synchronously or asynchronously, with doctors, to get initial recommendations or advice, to help in traumatic situations when no doctors have a chance of getting in immediate touch. One can conclude that while eHealth interventions are rare in constrained areas, mHealth is widely used for care and management [22]. …”