Tick-borne flaviviruses (TBFV) can cause severe neurological complications in humans, but differences in tissue tropism and pathogenicity have been described for individual virus strains. Viral protein synthesis leads to the induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) within infected cells. The IRE1 pathway has been hypothesized to support flavivirus replication by increasing protein and lipid biogenesis. Here, we investigated the role of the UPR in TBFV infection in human astrocytes, neuronal and intestinal cell lines that had been infected with tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) strains Neudoerfl and MucAr-HB-171/11 as well as Langat virus (LGTV). Both TBEV strains replicated better than LGTV in central nervous system (CNS) cells. TBEV strain MucAr-HB-171/11, which is associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, replicated best in intestinal cells. All three viruses activated the inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) pathway via the X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1). Interestingly, the neurotropic TBEV strain Neudoerfl induced a strong upregulation of XBP1 in all cell types, but with faster kinetics in CNS cells. In contrast, TBEV strain MucAr-HB-171/11 failed to activate the IRE1 pathway in astrocytes. The low pathogenic LGTV led to a mild induction of IRE1 signaling in astrocytes and intestinal cells. When cells were treated with IRE1 inhibitors prior to infection, TBFV replication in astrocytes was significantly reduced. This confirms a supporting role of the IRE1 pathway for TBFV infection in relevant viral target cells and suggests a correlation between viral tissue tropism and the cell-type dependent induction of the unfolded protein response.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Tick‐borne flaviviruses (TBFV) are transmitted by either tick‐bite or consumption of raw milk products from infected ruminants. After crossing the blood‐brain barrier, the virus enters the central nervous system (CNS) leading to neural inflammation and causing neurological complications. Individual viruses within this group, show differences in tissue tropism and pathogenicity. The mechanisms behind these differences are poorly understood, but likely result from a mix of direct viral replication and cellular responses to infection. Flavivirus replication is ER‐associated and uses the cellular machinery for viral protein synthesis. The increased protein burden results in the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). The IRE1 pathway is hypothesized to support flavivirus replication by increasing protein and lipid biogenesis. We investigated the ER stress response following flavivirus infection in relevant target cell types as well as the effect of ER stress inhibition on virus replication. For this purpose, human astrocyte, neuronal and intestinal cell lines were infected with tick‐borne encephalitis (TBEV) strains Neudörfl and HB171 as well as Langat virus (LGTV) and the rate of virus replication and activated UPR pathways in these cells were investigated. All three viruses activated the ER stress response in a virus‐ and cell‐type dependent manner with IRE1 being the prominent pathway. The upregulation of X‐box binding protein 1 (XBP1) as marker protein for the IRE1 pathway, differed between the cell lines and showed varying levels of intensities. The levels of activation of the IRE1 pathway among the three viruses correlated with their described levels of pathogenicity. As we found IRE1 to be the most strongly induced pathway, we further investigated the effect of three different IRE1 inhibitors on virus replication and cell viability during TBFV infection. Our data showed that TBFV replication was significantly reduced upon inhibition of the kinase and RNAse activity of IRE1, either combined or alone. These results confirm the supporting role of the IRE1 pathway for TBFV infection in relevant viral target cells and suggest that virus and cell‐type dependent differences in UPR induction may affect the outcome of the infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.