PurposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate the outcomes of primary photodynamic therapy (PDT) for small pigmented posterior pole choroidal melanoma.Patients and methodsProspective interventional consecutive case series of 15 patients with small pigmented posterior pole choroidal melanoma, who were treated with three sessions of PDT and followed-up thereafter. Risk factors for failure were assessed and outcome measures at presentation were compared to those at last follow-up visit.ResultsTumor control was achieved in 12 (80%) patients in a median follow-up time of 15 months (mean 14, range 8-18). Three patients failed treatment, diagnosed in a median time of 5 months (mean 4, range 3-6), after first PDT. In all failed cases, lesions were 100% pigmented; de novo melanoma rather than transformed nevi and showed a radial growth pattern rather than increased thickness. All failed cases were subsequently successfully treated with radiotherapy. In this cohort, subretinal fluid (SRF) was significantly reduced (P<0.001), vision did not deteriorate (P=0.11) and even improved in patients with subfoveal SRF at presentation (P=0.018), tumor height significantly decreased (P=0.037) and no complications were recorded.ConclusionPrimary PDT was found to be a safe and efficient treatment modality for small pigmented posterior pole choroidal melanoma, achieving short-term tumor control in 80% of patients. PDT offers patients the opportunity to preserve vision by avoiding the retinopathy associated with conventional radiation treatments for choroidal melanoma. However, the long-term local control of these tumors remains uncertain.

Multimodal imaging findings of torpedo maculopathy include disruption of the deep retinal capillary network, expansion of Sattler layer, and increased signal around the subretinal cleft.

This study reports novel data concerning RPE-BM segmentation in dry AMD and performs a direct comparison with age-matched normal controls. Our findings confirm the electron and light microscopy derived data and also establish the value of OCT in the quantification of the RPE-BM complex.

Background/Aims. To report the safety and efficacy of strontium (Sr90) beta radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for conjunctival melanoma. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken from 1999 to 2007 of all patients who underwent Sr90 beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. Failure of treatment was defined as recurrence of a conjunctival melanoma at the same location following beta radiotherapy. Results. Twenty patients underwent Sr90 beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. Median follow-up interval was 59 months (8–152). All patients had conjunctival melanoma involving the bulbar conjunctiva. Underlying diagnoses included PAM with atypia in 60% (12 of 20), PAM without atypia in 15% (3 of 20), and de novo conjunctival melanoma in 25% (5 of 20). Following Sr90 beta radiotherapy, in 90% (18 out of 20) local control was achieved and visual acuity was not affected in any patient. Three patients (15%) had dry eye symptoms, episcleritis, and descemetcoele, respectively. No cataract or secondary glaucoma was reported. Conclusions. Sr90 treatment is a very effective adjuvant treatment after excisional biopsy and cryotherapy for conjunctival melanoma with a local success rate of 90%. The treatment is not associated with significant side effects and visual acuity is not affected.

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy and the leading primary intraocular disease which can be fatal in adults. In this paper epidemiologic, pathogenetic, and clinical aspects of uveal melanoma are discussed. Despite the advance in local ocular treatments, there has been no change in patient survival for three decades. Development of metastases affects prognosis significantly. Current survival rates, factors predictive of metastatic potential and metastatic screening algorithms are discussed. Proposed and emerging treatments for uveal melanoma metastases are also overviewed. Current advances in genetics and cytogenetics have provided a significant insight in tumours with high metastatic potential and the molecular mechanisms that underlie their development. Biopsy of those lesions may prove to be important for prognostication and to allow further research into genetic mutations and potential new therapeutic targets in the future.

Purpose To describe the results of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for juxtapapillary and peripheral retinal capillary hemangioma (RCH). Patients and methods Interventional case series of four eyes (four patients) with juxtapapillary RCH and one eye (one patient) with peripheral RCH. Two eyes with juxtapapillary RCH had received two sessions of full-fluence, double-duration PDT; whereas other two eyes had received single session of half-fluence, single-duration PDT. The peripheral RCH was treated with a single session of full-fluence, single-duration PDT. Results Two patients had von HippelLindau disease. Follow-up duration ranged from 4 months to 1 year. Pre-PDT visual acuity (VA) ranged from 20/200 to HM (juxtapapillary RCH) and 20/100 (peripheral RCH). Among the eyes with juxtapapillary RCH, tumor regression with partial resolution of macular edema was noted in two eyes (one eye each with half-fluence and full-fluence PDT), whereas two eyes had no change in tumor size with persistent macular edema. VA remained stable in three eyes and declined in one eye. In an eye with peripheral RCH, regression of tumor and macular edema with VA improvement was noted. Post-PDT complications included epiretinal membrane (one eye) and transient exudative retinal detachment (one eye). Conclusion PDT can be effective in reducing macular edema associated with RCH but this does not always correspond with an improvement in VA especially for juxtapapillary tumors.

Vismodegib is proven to be effective in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma, but evidence of resistance is beginning to emerge. A case of advanced recurrent periocular basal cell carcinoma which responded dramatically to vismodegib after 3 months but recurred after 9 months due to drug resistance, eventually requiring orbital exenteration, is presented. The mechanism of vismodegib resistance is discussed.

BackgroundThe problem of access to medical information, particularly in low-income countries, has been under discussion for many years. Although a number of developments have occurred in the last decade (e.g., the open access (OA) movement and the website Sci-Hub), everyone agrees that these difficulties still persist very widely, mainly due to the fact that paywalls still limit access to approximately 75% of scholarly documents. In this study, we compare the accessibility of recent full text articles in the field of ophthalmology in 27 established institutions located worldwide.MethodsA total of 200 references from articles were retrieved using the PubMed database. Each article was individually checked for OA. Full texts of non-OA (i.e., “paywalled articles”) were examined to determine whether they were available using institutional and Hinari access in each institution studied, using “alternative ways” (i.e., PubMed Central, ResearchGate, Google Scholar, and Online Reprint Request), and using the website Sci-Hub.ResultsThe number of full texts of “paywalled articles” available using institutional and Hinari access showed strong heterogeneity, scattered between 0% full texts to 94.8% (mean = 46.8%; SD = 31.5; median = 51.3%). We found that complementary use of “alternative ways” and Sci-Hub leads to 95.5% of full text “paywalled articles,” and also divides by 14 the average extra costs needed to obtain all full texts on publishers’ websites using pay-per-view.ConclusionsThe scant number of available full text “paywalled articles” in most institutions studied encourages researchers in the field of ophthalmology to use Sci-Hub to search for scientific information. The scientific community and decision-makers must unite and strengthen their efforts to find solutions to improve access to scientific literature worldwide and avoid an implosion of the scientific publishing model. This study is not an endorsement for using Sci-Hub. The authors, their institutions, and publishers accept no responsibility on behalf of readers.