No abstract

No abstract

Background: T-DXd is a HER2-targeting antibodyedrug conjugate approved for pts with advanced HER2+ mBC based on the results from DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492). This is the first report of DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd vs T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane. This is the first reported randomized study of T-DXd in BC.Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, PFS by investigator, and safety.

Background: The incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rising. In view of continuously improving imaging techniques, more than half of the patients present with distant metastases at initial diagnosis. An advanced disease stage negatively correlates with the 5-year survival rate. In stage IV disease, bone metastases (BM) are frequent, yet knowledge concerning their clinical or prognostic relevance is rare. This study presents a single-center experience on the frequency and management of BM in patients with gastroenteropancreatic NEN and lung carcinoids. Methods: Between 2000 and June 2015, 327 of 677 patients treated in the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) center in Marburg (Germany) presented with distant metastases (48.3%), including 85 patients (12.6%) with BM. Data of both groups were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test. Results: Median age in the BM group was 54.9 years, the small intestine and the pancreas being the most common primaries. 83.5% of the tumors were well and moderately differentiated (G1/G2). Nearly half of the patients with BM were symptomatic and suffered either from pain (42.4%) or had fractures (11.7%). Bisphosphonates were employed in almost two-thirds of the patients, radiation therapy in 25.9%. Overall survival was significantly inferior in patients with BM than in those with other distant metastases (p = 0.01; 49.0 vs. 100.8 months). Conclusion: BM appear to have a significant clinical and prognostic impact. Further studies are needed to evaluate therapeutic approaches directed to the treatment of BM in particular for asymptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND:In North America and Europe, return-to-work (RTW) rates vary among breast cancer (BC) survivors, from 24% to 66% and from 53% to 82% at 6 and 36 months after diagnosis, respectively. To date, there is a lack of data on RTW rates after BC diagnosis in Latin America. Therefore, the primary objectives of this study were to define RTW rates at 12 and 24 months after BC diagnosis and to identify the factors associated with RTW in this population. METHODS: In total, 125 employed women from a single institution with newly diagnosed BC were interviewed by telephone at 6, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis. Those who had inoperable or metastatic disease were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, RTW rates were 30.3% and 60.4% at 12 and 24 months after BC diagnosis, respectively. Most women reported that they received support from their employer, but only 29.1% reported having been offered work adjustments. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with positive RTW outcomes included higher household income (odds ratio [OR], 17.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.33-94.75; P = .001), breast-conserving surgery (OR, 9.77; 95% CI, 2.03-47.05; P = .004), and work adjustments (OR, 37.62; 95% CI, 2.03-47.05; P = .004). The factors associated with negative RTW outcomes included adjuvant endocrine therapy (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P = .023), and depression diagnosed after BC (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.63; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: RTW rates in the current study were lower than those observed in developed countries but similar to the rates among low-income Americans. Workplace adjustments, higher income, breast-conserving surgery, endocrine therapy, and depression after BC played an important role in the RTW decision. Cancer 2018;124:4700-4710.

Background: T-DXd is a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of pts with advanced HER2+ mBC based on the DESTINY-Breast01 study (NCT03248492). DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110) isa randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study assessing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd vs. T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane. In the primary analysis, T-DXd demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS vs. T-DM1 (Corteset al, ESMO 2021). In this exploratory analysis, we provide additional efficacy and safety data in subgroups, including in pts with brain metastases (BMs). Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd or 3.6 mg/kg T-DM1 Q3W. Pts with clinically stable BMs were eligible. Lesions were measured per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) determined by blinded independent central review (BICR). PFS and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed for subgroups.Sites of progression and post-end-of-study therapies were also investigated. Results: At data cutoff (May 21, 2021), 524 pts were randomly assigned to T-DXd (n=261) orT-DM1 (n=263). T-DXd demonstrated superior PFS by BICR vs. T-DM1 (HR, 0.28 [95%CI, 0.22-0.37]; P=7.8 x 10-22); median (m) PFS by BICR was not reached (95% CI, 18.5-NE) for T-DXd compared with 6.8 mo (95% CI, 5.6-8.2) forT-DM1. For pts with stable BMs at baseline (n=82), mPFS was 15.0 mo (95% CI,12.5-22.2) for T-DXd vs. 3.0 mo (95% CI, 2.8-5.8) for T-DM1 (HR, 0.25 [95% CI,0.31-0.45)]. Overall, confirmed ORR for T-DXd was 79.7% vs. 34.2% for T-DM1.For patients with stable BMs at baseline, ORR was 67.4% for T-DXd vs. 20.5% forT-DM1. Consistent PFS and ORR benefit was also observed across other subgroups(Table 1). At data cutoff, 84 (32.2%) pts treated with T-DXd had progressive disease (PD) versus 155 (58.9%) with T-DM1. In pts with stable BMs in the T-DXd arm, 48.8% of pts (21/43) had PD. In pts with stable BMs in the T-DM1 arm, 69.2%of pts (27/39) had PD. Data on sites of progression will be presented. Further analyses are underway and will be presented. Overall, the safety profile of T-DXd was manageable and comparable with its known safety profile. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was reported in 27 (10.5%) pts treated with T-DXd and 5 (1.9%) pts treated with T-DM1 overall, with no grade 4 or 5 events. Additional new safety data will be presented. Conclusion: DESTINY-Breast03,the first-reported randomized phase 3 trial comparing T-DXd to standard of care, met the primary endpoint with T-DXd demonstrating superior PFS vs. T-DM1and T-DXd had a manageable safety profile. In this exploratory analysis, consistent PFS and ORR benefit with T-DXd vs. T-DM1 was observed across subgroups in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane, including in pts with BMs. Table 1.Subgroup Analyses forPFS and ORR of T-DXd versus T-DM1PFS by BICR HR (95% CI)Absolute ORR Difference (T-DXd-T-DM1) (95% CI)All patients (N=524)0.28 (0.22-0.37)45.5 (37.6-53.4)Hormone receptorPositive (n=272)0.32 (0.22-0.46)47.3 (36.1-58.4)Negative (n=248)0.30 (0.20-0.44)43.2 (31.5-55.0)Prior pertuzumabYes (n=320)0.31 (0.22-0.43)46.7 (36.5-56.9)No (n=204)0.30 (0.19-0.47)43.6 (30.5-56.7)Prior lines of therapya0-1 (n=258)0.33 (0.23-0.48)39.3 (27.3-51.2)≥2 (n=266)0.28 (0.19-0.41)51.6 (40.9-62.4)Visceral disease Yes (n=384)0.28 (0.21-0.38)48.3 (39.1-57.6)No (n=140)0.32 (0.17-0.58)39.1 (23.6-54.6)Brain metastases at baseline Yes (n=82)0.25 (0.13-0.45)46.9 (25.6-68.3)No (n=442)0.30 (0.22-0.40)45.5 (36.9-54.1) Citation Format: Sara Hurvitz, Sung-Bae Kim, Wei-Pang Chung, Seock-Ah Im, Yeon Hee Park, Roberto Hegg, Min-Hwan Kim, Ling-Ming Tseng, Vanessa Petry, Chi-Feng Chung, Hiroji Iwata, Erika Hamilton, Giuseppe Curigliano, Binghe Xu, Caleb Lee, Yali Liu, Jillian Cathcart, Emarjola Bako, Sunil Verma, Javier Cortés. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) vs. trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC): subgroup analyses from the randomized phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-01.

Atopic Dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects a large number of children and adults. The disease results from an interaction between genetic predisposition, host environment, skin barrier defects, and immunological factors. A major aggravating factor associated with Atopic Dermatitis is the presence of microorganisms on the patient's skin surface. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, for instance, can exacerbate chronic skin inflammation. As a result, antimicrobials have often been prescribed to control the acute phase of the disease. However, increased bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has made it difficult for dermatologists to prescribe appropriate medication. In the presence of disseminated dermatitis with secondary infection, systemic antibiotics need to be prescribed; however, treatment should be individualized, in an attempt to find the most effective antibiotic with fewer side effects. Also, the medication should be used for as short as possible in order to minimize bacterial resistance. Keywords: Bacterial growth; Bacterial infections; Dermatitis, atopic; Transformation, bacterial Resumo: A dermatite atópica é uma doença inflamatória crônica da pele que afeta um grande número de crianças e adultos. A doença resulta da interação entre predisposição genética, fatores ambientais, defeitos da barreira cutânea e fatores imunológicos. Um dos grandes fatores agravantes associados à dermatite atópica é a presença de microorganismos na superfície cutânea desses pacientes. Staphylococcus aureus e Streptococcus pyogenes, por exemplo, podem exacerbar a inflamação crônica da pele. Como resultado, antimicrobianos são prescritos para controlar a fase aguda da doença. O constante crescimento da resistência bacteriana aos antimicrobianos tem tornado a escolha do mais adequado medicamento uma difícil decisão para os dermatologistas. Na presença de dermatite disseminada com infecção secundaria, antibióticos sistêmicos necessitam ser prescritos; no entanto, o tratamento deve ser individualizado, de forma a encontrar o antimicrobiano mais eficaz e com menores efeitos colaterais. Além disso, esse medicamento deve ser utilizado pelo menor tempo possível, a fim de minimizar a resistência bacteriana.

The results of this study confirm a high rate of S. aureus colonization in pediatric patients with AD and indicate a relevant association between colonization and high EASI score. No MRSA was found in cultures from this sample of patients in southern Brazil. Nearly one-third of isolates were identified as resistant to erythromycin, an antibiotic that is commonly used in pediatric patients.