BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) is a key conditioning factor for long-term graft function and survival in renal transplantation patients. The standard care with creatinine measurements and biopsy upon allograft dysfunction implies that AR is usually detected at advanced stages. Rapid noninvasive biomarkers of rejection are needed to improve the management of these patients. We assessed whether total cell-free DNA (tCF-DNA) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddCF-DNA) were useful markers for this purpose, both in plasma and in urine.

Background: Circulating nucleic acids were discovered more than 60 y ago. With the recent developments in the study of circulating nucleic acids, its application in the diagnostic field has increased. The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of the quantification of cell-free plasma DNA (CF-DNA) concentration in the diagnosis of infections in febrile patients and as a prognostic marker in septic patients. Methods: Concentrations of CF-DNA, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in 110 febrile patients who were clinically diagnosed with fever of unknown origin, localized infection, sepsis or septic shock. Results: Concentrations of CF-DNA increase according to the severity of the infection. The best cut-off point for predicting infection was 2800 GE (genome equivalents)/mL (sensitivity: 95.0%; specificity: 96.7%) and 14,000 GE/mL for sepsis prediction (sensitivity: 77.8%; specificity: 94.6%). Higher concentrations of CF-DNA were found in exitus septic patients than in survivors. The diagnostic efficiency of CF-DNA was similar to PCT and higher than CRP in infectious processes. Conclusions: Normal concentrations of CF-DNA can exclude the presence of an infection in febrile patients, and very high concentrations (.10-fold over the normal reference range) stratify the severity of infections, showing a high prognostic value to predict mortality in the absence of other causes for elevated CF-DNA.

Plasma DNA levels significantly increase after a conventional 2.5-5-h HD session. Therefore, HD patients require special consideration for correct interpretation of plasma DNA concentrations. This parameter can be considered a reliable diagnostic tool for certain pathologies when measured at least 30 min after a HD session without further complications. The different dialysis membranes used in this study had no influence on cell-free plasma DNA concentrations, so the level of circulating DNA is not an appropriate marker of dialysis membrane biocompatibility.

No abstract

No abstract