2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated transrenal DNA (cell-free urine DNA) in patients with urinary tract infection compared to healthy controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are corroborated by previous results which have demonstrated that in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, the quantity of donor-derived cf-DNA in urine does not correlate with that of plasma and that the predominant cf-DNA fragment size differs between plasma and urine [44][45]. A similar phenomenon regarding the DNA fragment size discrepancy between plasma and urine cf-DNA has also been observed in pregnant women [46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are corroborated by previous results which have demonstrated that in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, the quantity of donor-derived cf-DNA in urine does not correlate with that of plasma and that the predominant cf-DNA fragment size differs between plasma and urine [44][45]. A similar phenomenon regarding the DNA fragment size discrepancy between plasma and urine cf-DNA has also been observed in pregnant women [46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The former is supported by the observation that patients with urinary tract infection have elevated urine cf-DNA levels [44], whereas the latter has been demonstrated in colorectal cancer patients who displayed tumor-derived mutated K-ras sequences in the transrenal urine cf-DNA [47][48]. Likewise, Y-chromosomal DNA sequences have been detected in the urine of pregnant women carrying male fetuses [44]. Based on animal studies, however, it has been estimated that only 0.5–2% of the circulating DNA passes through the kidneys and is excreted into the urine in a polymeric form [44], [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They found out that when the Tr-DNA quantification is used as a marker for clinical monitoring (i.e. follow up of cancer or transplantation patients), it is important to rule out a concomitant UTI, because a secondary cause of increased concentrations of cell free urine DNA could confound clinical decisions (55). …”
Section: Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%