Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint replacement surgery. Most observational studies of PJI are retrospective or single-center, and reported management approaches and outcomes vary widely. We hypothesized that there would be substantial heterogeneity in PJI management and that most PJIs would present as late acute infections occurring as a consequence of bloodstream infections. Methods The Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational (PIANO) study is a prospective study at 27 hospitals. From July 2014 through December 2017, we enrolled all adults with a newly diagnosed PJI of a large joint. We collected data on demographics, microbiology, and surgical and antibiotic management over the first 3 months postpresentation. Results We enrolled 783 patients (427 knee, 323 hip, 25 shoulder, 6 elbow, and 2 ankle). The mode of presentation was late acute (>30 days postimplantation and <7 days of symptoms; 351, 45%), followed by early (≤30 days postimplantation; 196, 25%) and chronic (>30 days postimplantation with ≥30 days of symptoms; 148, 19%). Debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention constituted the commonest initial management approach (565, 72%), but debridement was moderate or less in 142 (25%) and the polyethylene liner was not exchanged in 104 (23%). Conclusions In contrast to most studies, late acute infection was the most common mode of presentation, likely reflecting hematogenous seeding. Management was heterogeneous, reflecting the poor evidence base and the need for randomized controlled trials.

HighlightsLactobacillus in blood culture should not be routinely considered as a contaminant.With the isolation of lactobacillus, linkages to diet and probiotic consumption should be sought.Immunosuppressed patients should be cautious before consuming probiotic or other dietary supplements containing live or lyophilised organism.Establishment of new safety standards for probiotics are required.A revision of probiotic status and warnings are required in order to encompass the potential for harm.

Background Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating condition and there is a lack of evidence to guide its management. We hypothesised that treatment success is independently associated with modifiable variables in surgical and antibiotic management. Methods Prospective, observational study at 27 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Newly diagnosed large joint PJIs were eligible. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 12 and 24 months. The main outcome measures at 24 months were clinical cure (defined as all of: alive, absence of clinical or microbiological evidence of infection and not requiring ongoing antibiotic therapy) and treatment success (clinical cure plus index prosthesis still in place). Findings 24-month outcome data were available for 653 patients. Overall, 449 (69%) experienced clinical cure and 350 (54%) treatment success. The most common treatment strategy was debridement and implant retention, with success rates highest in early post-implant infections (119/160; 74%) and lower in late acute (132/267, 49%) and chronic (63/142, 44%) infections. Selected comorbidities, knee joint and S.aureus infections were independently associated with treatment failure, but antibiotic choice and duration (including rifampicin use) and extent of debridement were not. Interpretation Treatment success in PJI is associated with selecting the appropriate treatment strategy, and with non-modifiable patient and infection factors. Interdisciplinary decision-making which matches an individual patient to an appropriate management strategy is a critical step for PJI management. Randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the role of rifampicin in patients managed with DAIR and the optimal surgical strategy for late-acute PJI.

No abstract