C urrently, 3 vaccines have been granted Emergency Use Authorization for coronavirus disease 2019 prevention in the United States. These include the messenger RNA (mRNA) platform vaccines (mRNA-1273; Moderna/National Institutes of Health) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and an adenovirus vector vaccine (Ad26.CoV2.S; Johnson & Johnson), which were 94%, 95%, and 67% effective against COVID-19 infection in their phase III registry trials against the endemic variants at the time, respectively. 1-3 All 3 vaccines target the viral spike (S) protein that facilitates severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) entry into host cells via its receptor binding domain, which interacts with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. 4 Although the mRNA platform vaccines are 2-dose vaccines administered 3-4 weeks apart, the Ad26.CoV2.S is administered as a single dose. Another adenovirus vector vaccine (ChAdOx1; Astrazeneca), not yet authorized in the United States, is intended as a 2-dose regimen with an interval of 8-12 weeks.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and advanced therapies may have normal to slightly decreased humoral responses to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine platforms. 1 In addition, patients receiving infliximab and/or thiopurines have significantly lower rates of seroconversion than those on vedolizumab monotherapy after a single dose of either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. 2 A study of solid organ transplant recipients showed decreased humoral responses to Ad26.CoV2.S vaccine relative to both mRNA platform vaccines, although it is unknown whether these findings are generalizable to other immune compromised populations. 5 Q5 We aimed to assess for differences in serologic responses among patients with IBD who received Ad26.CoV2.S relative to those receiving mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2. Among 353 vaccine recipients with IBD participating in a prospective SARS-CoV-2 vaccine registry without prior COVID-19 infection and who had completed a full vaccine regimen, 148 (42%), 193 (55%), and 12 (3%) received mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.CoV2.S, respectively. Demographic and disease characteristics were similar across vaccine groups (mean age, 51 years, 62% were female) (Supplementary Table 1). Approximately 290 (83.1%) participants were on immune-modifying therapies (IMTs), as defined by receipt of advanced therapies (biologics or JAK inhibitors, 80.2%), immunomodulators (16.6%), and/or systemic corticosteroids (6.6%) at the time of initial vaccination. At least 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen, positive antibody levels were detected in 121 (100%), 142 (99%), and 9 (90%) patients receiving mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.CoV2.S, respectively (Figure 1A). Quantitative log 10 (anti-Spike IgG

Lay Summary T-cell and antibody responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients are poorly correlated. T-cell responses are preserved by most biologic therapies, but augmented by anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment. While anti-TNF therapy blunts the antibody response, cellular immunity after vaccination is robust.

Background: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is a highly effective strategy to protect against infection, which is predominantly mediated by vaccine-induced antibodies. Postvaccination antibodies are robustly produced by those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) even on immune-modifying therapies but are blunted by anti-TNF therapy. In contrast, T-cell response which primarily determines long-term efficacy against disease progression, , is less well understood. We aimed to assess the post-vaccination T-cell response and its relationship to antibody responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies. Methods: We evaluated IBD patients who completed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using samples collected at four time points (dose 1, dose 2, 2 weeks after dose 2, 8 weeks after dose 2). T-cell clonal analysis was performed by T-cell Receptor (TCR) immunosequencing. The breadth (number of unique sequences to a given protein) and depth (relative abundance of all the unique sequences to a given protein) of the T-cell clonal response were quantified using reference datasets and were compared to antibody responses. Results: Overall, 303 subjects were included (55% female; 5% with prior COVID) (Table). 53% received BNT262b (Pfizer), 42% mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and 5% Ad26CoV2 (J&J). The Spike-specific clonal response peaked 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen (3- and 5-fold for breadth and depth, respectively); no changes were seen for non-Spike clones, suggesting vaccine specificity. Reduced T-cell clonal depth was associated with chronologic age, male sex, and immunomodulator treatment. It was preserved by non-anti-TNF biologic therapies, and augmented clonal depth was associated with anti-TNF treatment. TCR depth and breadth were associated with vaccine type; after adjusting for age and gender, Ad26CoV2 (J&J) exhibited weaker metrics than mRNA-1273 (Moderna) (p=0.01 for each) or BNT262b (Pfizer) (p=0.056 for depth). Antibody and T-cell responses were only modestly correlated. While those with robust humoral responses also had robust TCR clonal expansion, a substantial fraction of patients with high antibody levels had only a minimal T-cell clonal response.. Conclusion: Age, sex and select immunotherapies are associated with the T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and T-cell responses are low in many patients despite high antibody levels. These factors, as well as differences seen by vaccine type may help guide reimmunization vaccine strategy in immune-impaired populations. Further study of the effects of anti-TNF therapy on vaccine responses are warranted.

T-cells specifically bind antigens to induce adaptive immune responses using highly specific molecular recognition, and a diverse T-cell repertoire with expansion of antigen-specific clones can indicate robust immune responses after infection or vaccination. For patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a spectrum of chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases usually requiring immunomodulatory treatment, the T-cell response has not been well characterized. Understanding the patient factors that result in strong vaccination responses is critical to guiding vaccination schedules and identifying mechanisms of T-cell responses in IBD and other immune-mediated conditions. Here we used T-cell receptor sequencing to show that T-cell responses in an IBD cohort were influenced by demographic and immune factors, relative to a control cohort of health care workers (HCWs). Subjects were sampled at the time of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and longitudinally afterwards; TCR Vβ gene repertoires were sequenced and analyzed for COVID-19-specific clones. We observed significant differences in the overall strength of the T-cell response by age and vaccine type. We further stratified the T-cell response into Class-I- and Class-II-specific responses, showing that Ad26.COV2.S vector vaccine induced Class-I-biased T-cell responses, whereas mRNA vaccine types led to different responses, with mRNA-1273 vaccine inducing a more Class-I-deficient T-cell response compared to BNT162b2. Finally, we showed that these T-cell patterns were consistent with antibody levels from the same patients. Our results account for the surprising success of vaccination in nominally immuno-compromised IBD patients, while suggesting that a subset of IBD patients prone to deficiencies in T-cell response may warrant enhanced booster protocols.

Background The safety of a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is unknown. Methods We compared symptoms following a third SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose with symptoms after the second dose in IBD. Results The study group included 594 patients (70% female, 58% BNT162b2). Overall, 41% reported symptoms after a third dose. Symptom frequency and severity were lower after the third dose relative to the second dose for every organ system, except for gastrointestinal symptoms which were marginally worse. Conclusion The frequency and severity of symptoms after a third mRNA vaccine dose are generally similar or milder than after a second dose for most organ systems.

No abstract

Despite demonstrated efficacy of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), widespread hesitancy to vaccination persists. Improved knowledge regarding frequency, severity, and duration of vaccine-associated symptoms may help reduce hesitancy. In this prospective observational study, we studied 1032 healthcare workers who received both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine and completed post-vaccine symptom surveys both after dose 1 and after dose 2. We defined appreciable post-vaccine symptoms as those of at least moderate severity and lasting at least 2 days. We found that symptoms were more frequent following the second vaccine dose than the first (74% vs. 60%, P < 0.001), with >80% of all symptoms resolving within 2 days. The most common symptom was injection site pain, followed by fatigue and malaise. Overall, 20% of participants experienced appreciable symptoms after dose 1 and 30% after dose 2. In multivariable analyses, female sex was associated with greater odds of appreciable symptoms after both dose 1 (OR, 95% CI 1.73, 1.19–2.51) and dose 2 (1.76, 1.28–2.42). Prior COVID-19 was also associated with appreciable symptoms following dose 1, while younger age and history of hypertension were associated with appreciable symptoms after dose 2. We conclude that most post-vaccine symptoms are reportedly mild and last <2 days. Appreciable post-vaccine symptoms are associated with female sex, prior COVID-19, younger age, and hypertension. This information can aid clinicians in advising patients on the safety and expected symptomatology associated with vaccination.

No abstract