No abstract

Our objective was to compare the AI submission rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) at first service of lactating Holstein cows submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and timed artificial insemination (TAI) versus artificial insemination (AI) to a detected estrus after synchronization of estrus at a similar day in milk range. Lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned to receive their first TAI after a Double-Ovsynch protocol (DO; n = 294) or to receive their first AI after a synchronized estrus (EST; n = 284). Pregnancy status was determined 33 ± 3 d after insemination and was reconfirmed 63 ± 3 d after insemination. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and logistic regression using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). By design, days in milk at first insemination did not differ between treatments (76.9 ± 0.2 vs. 76.7 ± 0.3 for DO vs. EST cows, respectively), but more DO cows were inseminated within 7 d after the end of the voluntary waiting period than EST cows (100.0 vs. 77.5%). Overall, DO cows had more P/AI than EST cows at both 33 d (49.0 vs. 38.6%) and 63 d (44.6 vs. 36.4%) after insemination, but pregnancy loss from 33 to 63 d after insemination did not differ between treatments. Primiparous cows had more P/AI than multiparous cows 33 and 63 d after insemination, but the treatment by parity interaction was not significant. Synchronization rate to the hormonal protocols was 85.3%, which did not differ between treatments; however, synchronized DO cows had more P/AI 33 d after insemination than synchronized EST cows (54.7 vs. 44.5%). In summary, submission of lactating Holstein cows to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and TAI for first insemination increased the percentage of cows inseminated within 7 d after the end of the voluntary waiting period and increased P/AI at 33 and 63 d after first insemination resulting in 64 and 58% more pregnant cows, respectively, than submission of cows for first AI after detection of estrus at a similar day in milk range. We conclude that, because the proportion of synchronized cows did not differ between treatments, DO cows had more P/AI than EST cows because of an intrinsic increase in fertility after submission to a fertility program.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a second PGF2α treatment and duration of an Ovsynch protocol that included a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) on progesterone (P4) concentrations and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) after resynchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination (TAI). Lactating Holstein cows (n=821) were assigned randomly at a nonpregnancy diagnosis (d 0) to 3 resynchronization protocols: (1) GnRH, d 0; PGF2α, d 7; GnRH, d 9.5 (7D1PGF); (2) GnRH, d 0; PGF2α, d 7; PGF2α, d 8; GnRH, d 9.5); (7D2PGF); or (3) GnRH, d 2; PGF2α, d 7; PGF2α, d 8; GnRH, d 9.5 (5D2PGF). All cows received a PRID at the first GnRH treatment of the resynchronization protocol, which was removed at the first PGF2α treatment, and all cows received TAI approximately 16h after the second GnRH treatment. Blood samples were collected from a subgroup of cows at each treatment of the resynchronization protocols. At 32 d after TAI, cows receiving a second PGF2α treatment (7D2PGF + 5D2PGF cows) had more P/AI (42.6 vs. 35.7%) than cows receiving a single PGF2α treatment (7D1PGF cows). For cows treated with a second PGF2α treatment, decreasing the duration of the protocol did not increase P/AI (41.4 vs. 43.8% for 7D2PGF vs. 5D2PGF cows). At 60 d after TAI, P/AI did not differ between cows treated with the 1 PGF2α (7D1PGF cows) or 2 PGF2α (7D2PGF + 5D1PGF cows) treatments (32.5 vs. 37.9%, respectively). In addition, reducing the duration of the protocol did not increase P/AI at 60 d after TAI (37.8 vs. 38.5% for 7D2PGF vs. 5D2PGF cows). Pregnancy loss from 32 to 60 d after TAI was not affected by the number of PGF2α treatments (8.5 vs. 10.6%, for 7D1PGF vs. 7D2PGF + 5D2PGF cows) or the duration of the protocol (9.1 vs. 12.1%, for 7D2PGF vs. 5D2PGF cows). The percentage of cows with incomplete luteal regression at the second GnRH treatment tended to differ among treatments and was lowest for 7D2PGF cows, intermediate for 5D2PGF cows, and greatest for 7D1PGF cows (1.9 vs. 6.9 vs. 11.0%, respectively). In conclusion, addition of a second PGF2α treatment tended to decrease the percentage of cows with incomplete luteal regression and increased P/AI 32 d after AI, whereas decreasing the duration of the Ovsynch protocol did not increase P/AI.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a second PGF treatment (25 mg of dinoprost) or a double dose of PGF (50 mg of dinoprost) during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,100) were randomly assigned at a nonpregnancy diagnosis to receive (1) Ovsynch (control: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 25 mg of PGF; 56 h, 100 µg of GnRH), (2) Ovsynch with a second PGF treatment (GPPG: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 25 mg of PGF; 24 h, 25 mg of PGF; 32 h, 100 µg of GnRH), or (3) Ovsynch with a double dose of PGF (GDDP: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 50 mg of PGF; 56 h, 100 µg of GnRH). All cows received timed artificial insemination (TAI) approximately 16 h after the second GnRH treatment (G2). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal palpation 39 ± 3 d after TAI, and pregnancy status was reconfirmed 66 d after TAI. Blood samples collected from a subset of cows in each treatment at the first PGF treatment (n = 394) and at G2 (n = 367) were assayed for progesterone (P4). Data were analyzed by logistic regression using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). At 39 d after TAI, GPPG cows tended to have more P/AI than control cows [35% (137/387) vs. 31% (107/349)], whereas P/AI for GDDP cows [32% (118/364)] did not differ from that for control cows. Pregnancy loss from 38 to 66 d did not differ among treatments and was 8% (30/362). The percentage of cows with complete luteal regression (P4 <0.4 ng/mL at G2) tended to differ among treatments and was greater for GPPG cows than for GDDP and control cows (94% vs. 88% vs. 88%, respectively). Overall, cows with P4 <1 ng/mL at the first PGF treatment had fewer P/AI than cows with P4 ≥1 ng/mL (27% vs. 38%), whereas cows with P4 ≥0.4 ng/mL at G2 had fewer P/AI than cows with P4 <0.4 ng/mL (15% vs. 38%). We conclude that adding a second PGF treatment 24 h after the first within a Resynch protocol tended to increase the proportion of cows undergoing complete luteal regression and P/AI, whereas treatment with a double dose of PGF at a single time did not.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract