According to literature data, up to 59% of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) have no reflux at the terminal valve (TV) of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). The aim was to compare color duplex ultrasound (CDU) investigation and direct intra-operative assessment of competence of the TV at SFJ.A prospective comparative study was performed on 28 patients, who consecutively presented for surgical intervention for their primary varicose veins of the lower limbs with GSV incompetence. CDU assessment was performed pre-operatively to define GSV and SFJ terminal valve morphology and hemodynamics. Under local anesthesia these patients underwent SFJ disconnection (crossectomy) and segmental inverted saphenous stripping of the incompetent GSV tract + phlebectomy of the varicose tributaries. SFJ disconnection was performed in four stages in an ascending fashion: I) division of GSV below the lower SFJ tributaries, II) disconnection of lower SFJ tributaries, III) disconnection of upper tributaries, IV) flush to CFV ligature of GSV stump. After the completion of stage I, the SFJ stump was opened and kept open when needed throughout the subsequent stages, in order to highlight any possible blood leak through the SFJ stump. To highlight intraoperative blood leak from SFJ stump visual observation was carried out both during respiration and when performing Valsalva maneuver and manual compression of homolateral iliac fossa.As to pre-operative CDU all limbs showed GSV reflux and they were divided in two groups according to TV competence (group A) or incompetence (group B). Group A comprised 18 patients (6 M and 12 F), mean age 50.6 years.Group B included 10 patients (4 M and 6 F), mean age 54.8 years. Mean calibre of GSV at proximal/mid thigh was 6.4 mm in group A and 7.8 in group B. Concerning the intra-operative findings: in the group A, 5 patients had blood leak in the SFJ stump after stage I, 4 patients showed blood leak after stage II. After completion of stage III, only one severely obese patient had persistent reflux, whereas 17 patients had no reflux. Conversely the 10 patients from group B had reflux within GSV stump throughout the 3 stages.CDU pre-operative assessment matches intra-operative findings with regards to GSV TV competence/incompetence, with a good overall accuracy (27/28-94%). Different SFJ retrograde flow patterns should be elicited through CDU investigation. Obese patients need a more thorough CDU examination to avoid false negatives.
Objective: To evaluate duplex or colour flow duplex ultrasound scanning (CFDS) in varicose vein surgery as a perioperative guide for mapping, marking and local anaesthesia (LA), on the basis of our experience since 1990. Design: Retrospective clinical series. Patients and methods: A total of 3150 interventions for varicose veins were performed on an outpatient basis since 1990. This review of the last 4 years' experience (January 1996 to December 1999) deals with 1824 operations (457 men, 938 women; mean age 55.3 years). Duplex scanning or CFDS was used for perioperative investigation in all the patients, but also to guide skin marking and to help in the injection of LA (mepivacaine chloridrate 0.25–0.4%). The surgical approach varied according to the patient's morphohaemodynamic findings. Results: Several different preoperative patterns of varicose vein disease resulted in a ‘made-to-measure’ surgical approach, allowing segmental saphenous stripping in 99.9% of the patients, and ligation of perforating veins in 0.9% of cases. Immediate postoperative walking was possible in 99.8% of the patients and 3–6 h hospitalisation time in 99.5%. LA caused only minor complications (haematoma, urticaria) in 15 cases. Duplex monitoring of infiltration has facilitated LA usage, decreasing the doses and concentrations required and improving its efficacy. The operation costs decreased with time; major complications were 2 deep vein thromboses, one with a probable pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: The use of duplex scanning or CFDS in varicose vein surgery has permitted accurate preoperative evaluation and a guide to injection of LA, resulting in more conservative and targeted surgery. Patient compliance and cost-efficacy were also improved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.