2012
DOI: 10.4081/vl.2012.e9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminal valve of sapheno-femoral junction: a comparative assessment between pre-operative color-duplex ultrasound and intra-operative evaluation

Abstract: According to literature data, up to 59% of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) have no reflux at the terminal valve (TV) of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). The aim was to compare color duplex ultrasound (CDU) investigation and direct intra-operative assessment of competence of the TV at SFJ.A prospective comparative study was performed on 28 patients, who consecutively presented for surgical intervention for their primary varicose veins of the lower limbs with GSV incompetence. CDU assessment was perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4,33,34 Notwithstanding the objective differences in the modalities of the measurement of pre-treatment GSV diameter, in several studies on thermal ablation the treated GSVs had a 6 mm diameter in the vast majority of the patients. 35 In the current cohort of patients the procedure was applied to quite large GSVs, which depends upon the TV incompetence as an inclusion criteria, and positive results were achieved, notwithstanding the negative prognostic factor represented by large vein diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3,4,33,34 Notwithstanding the objective differences in the modalities of the measurement of pre-treatment GSV diameter, in several studies on thermal ablation the treated GSVs had a 6 mm diameter in the vast majority of the patients. 35 In the current cohort of patients the procedure was applied to quite large GSVs, which depends upon the TV incompetence as an inclusion criteria, and positive results were achieved, notwithstanding the negative prognostic factor represented by large vein diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[71][72][73] Furthermore, also postoperative analysis changed its perspective as clinical aspects could be verified by Duplex revealing a much higher recurrence rate. 74 In particular, it became clear that GSV reflux is not always associated to SFJ incompetence; 75 79 ). In this instance junction dissection and high ligation is useless 80 and even harmful, the source of reflux coming from a perforator or tributaries.…”
Section: The Duplex Adventmentioning
confidence: 99%