Background The urticaria control test (UCT) is a questionnaire designed to determine if chronic urticaria (CU) is controlled or not and to aid therapeutic decision-making. It collects retrospective information about the symptoms and quality of life impairment over the last 4 weeks. The current study aimed to investigate the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the Turkish version of the UCT. We also evaluated its correlation with other tools and compared the UCT results of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and patients with chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU). Methods Following forward/backward translation and cognitive debriefing, the Turkish version of the UCT was used in 81 CSU and 78 CINDU patients. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI), Chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), urticaria activity score (UAS), patients' and physicians’ global assessment visual analog scores and Likert scales were used at baseline and after four weeks to assess quality of life impairment, disease activity and disease control. Statistical analysis to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the UCT as well as comparison between CINDU and CSU patients were performed. Results Duration of disease was longer, disease control was poorer and severe complaints were more frequent in CINDU patients (duration of disease: 36.3 (24) ± 49.1 vs 31.5 (9) ± 67.9, p = .007, UCT baseline: 8.4 (8) ± 3.4 vs 10.4 (11) ± 3.9, p = .001 and patient's global assessment Likert scale severe complaints: 6 vs 15, p < .001, respectively). The UCT showed excellent internal consistency for CSU and a minimally acceptable consistency for CINDU ( Cronbach's α 0.89 for CSU versus 0.68 for CINDU). It showed strong correlation with CU-Q2oL but a moderate correlation with DLQI (r = −0.649, P < .001 and r = −0.545, P < .001, respectively). It was able to discriminate between patients with different disease control and was sensitive to detect changes in the disease control in both groups. The minimally important difference of the UCT was found to be 3. Conclusions The Turkish version of the UCT is a valid and reliable tool for the management of CU patients and can be used both in CSU and CINDU patients to determine if the treatment is sufficient and if disease activity and quality of life impairment are under control or not.

No abstract

Background: Fric test is a useful tool for the diagnosis and threshold testing for symptomatic dermographism. When threshold testing is not available, Urticaria Control Test (UCT) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) might be used to assess disease control and quality of life (QoL) impairment, respectively. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to describe a new scoring system for the Fric test and evaluate the correlations of Fric scores with UCT, DLQI, and other disease activity assessment scores. Method: Provocation test with Fric Test 4.0 was performed in all patients at referral and at the 4th week. We considered a 4-grade rating score for Fric Test (0–4) [Total Fric Score (TFS)]. A positive response with all of the four pins suggested severe dermographism (TFS = 4), while a wheal with only the largest pin (4.5 mm) was considered as milder disease (TFS = 1). Treatment responses were evaluated with Fric Test 4.0, UCT, patient’s global assessment of disease severity (PatGA-VAS), the physician’s global assessment of disease control (PhyGA-VAS), and DLQI at baseline and at the 4th week of treatment. The correlations of TFS with UCT, DLQI, PatGA-VAS, PhyGA-VAS at baseline as well as the changes in the mean scores after treatment (week 4) were performed. Results: The mean UCT and DLQI scores were 8.69 ± 3.40 and 7.88 ± 6.02 at the first visit. At the second visit, TFS decreased from a mean of 2.79 ± 1.68 to 1.91 ± 1.85 (p < 0.001), and UCT scores and PhyGA-VAS were increased (p < 0.001), while DLQI scores, PatGA-VAS, and pruritus scores decreased significantly (p = 0.002; p = 0.001; p = 0.012). There was a positive correlation between TFS and pruritus scores (r = 0.378) and DLQI scores (r = 0.392). TFS was found to have a negative correlation with UCT score (r = –0.283) and PhyGA-VAS (r = –0.347). Conclusions: This new Fric scoring system allows comparison with other tools and shows moderate correlations with most of the tools. Using disease-specific tools is recommended since they provide a subjective evaluation of disease severity, QoL impairment, and disease control.

We present a case of in-transit metastasis in a nonimmunosuppressed patient with a primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Tümör nekroz faktörü-alfa (TNF-α) inhibitörlerinin birçok romatizmal ve otoimmün hastalığın tedavisinde kullanımları son yıllarda artmıştır. TNF-α inhibitörlerine bağlı nörolojik yan etkiler nadir görülmelerine karşın oldukça ciddi komplikasyonlar oluşturabilirler. TNF-α inhibitörleri hem santral hem de periferik sinir sistemine ilişkin demiyelinizan tablolara yol açabilir. Klinik tablo, biyolojik ajan tedavisinin kesilmesi ile düzelebildiği gibi, bazı olgularda sistemik steroid veya intravenöz immünoglobülin tedavisine gereksinim duyulabilir. Burada, standart tedaviye dirençli piyoderma gangrenosum nedeniyle infliksimab tedavisi başlanmasından sonra motor nöropati gelişen bir olgu sunulmaktadır.