No abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between Cathepsin D (Cath-D) and E-Cadherin (E-Cad) expression levels in tumor tissue and neck lymph node metastasis. This attempt should be made to identify new factors that one could be useful in predicting clinical behavior. Study design In this study, we investigated rates of dying for E-Cad and Cath-D in paraphin blocks of larynx and neck dissection specimens taken from 56 selected patients. Laryngeal specimens dyed by ECad and Cath-D immunohistochemically. Immunoreactivity classiWed for E-Cad as positive (75% and above), reduced (25-75%) and negative (below 25%). Immunoreactivity classiWed for Cath-D:dye absorption rates higher than 50% evaluated positive and absorption rates lower than 50% evaluated negative. We compared the rates of dying for E-Cad and Cath-D groups to with or without neck lymph node metastasis in specimens. Results Neck metastasis were found in 41% of patients, in 55.6% of patients, if the E-Cad was negative, 40.6% if it was reduced, 33.3% if it was positive in specimens. The neck metastasis was found in 35.4% of patients with Cath-D expression negative, while 75% of patients was found with Cath-D expression positive. Conclusion Neck metastasis was found higher in E-Cad reduced group than positive group. Neck node metastasis was signiWcantly higher in Cath-D positive group than Cath-D negative group. Cath-D and E-Cad essays may useful in identifying neck lymph node involvement. Cath-D expression levels are more in this predictive factor than E-Cad levels for possibility of neck lymph node metastasis in LSCC.

A 25-year-old man presented with a 3 month history of a painless mass on the right side of his neck. Physical examination revealed a smooth surfaced, bilobed, 4×3 cm, semimobile mass at the right and 3×2 cm at the left jugulodigastric region. Endoscopic examination of the patient showed a granular tumour in both nasal cavities. After biopsies were taken from the mass from the nasal cavity, a diagnosis of Rosai-Dorfman disease was made. A conservative approach was taken to treatment and after the 6 month follow-up period, the patient was in a stable condition.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: In otology, a wide variety of devices are used that have significant noise output, both operated ear and the patient. We aimed to determine hearing damages due to drill-generated acoustic trauma in ear surgery. We want to find how degree drill-generated acoustic trauma is responsible from sensorineural hearing loss in ear surgery. Materials and methods:We designed a retrospective study about 100 patients who underwent radical or modiphied radical mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. The audiometric testing was done both pre and postoperatively to detect any significant hearing loss in the immediate postoperative period. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon sign and Mann-Whitney U tests. This study proposes that hearing loss is caused by drill noise conducted to the operated ear by vibrations of temporal bone.Results: A sensorineural hearing loss soon after mastoid surgery is seen due to the noise generated by the drill. Mean pure-tone thresholds obtained was significantly more in mastoidectomy applied patients when compared to tympanoplasty . Mean bone conduction (BC) hearing levels impaired 6,6 dB in 1 kHz ,5.5 dB in 0.5 kHz , 5 dB in 4.kHz and 3.1 dB in 2 kHz in mastoidectomy groups but improved 5.5 dB in 0.5 kHz, 2.2 dB in 1 kHz , 2.7 dB in 2 kHz in tympanoplasty groups. Statistically significant differences were observed at the 0.5-1 and 4 kHz frequencies pre and postoperative in the hearing thresholds of BC changing in mastoidectomy group, however, the averages of ranks of all pre and postoperative measurement of hearing levels show differences between mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty groups was significant in statistically at independent groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion:We conclude that drill-generated noise during mastoid surgery has been incriminated as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Drilling during mastoid surgery may result in temporary or permanent noise-induced hearing loss. Possible noise disturbance to the inner ear can only be avoided by minimizing the duration of harmful noise exposure and carefull using burr to near the cochlear structures.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of intratympanic dexamethasone (ITD) injections as a new treatment modality in otitis media with effusion resistant to conventional therapy. We planned a nonrandomized prospective study to determine the safety and effectiveness of the direct administration of dexamethasone into middle ear cavity with chronic eustachian tube dysfunction. This study was applied on 75 ears of 64 patients aged from 12 to 60 years. ITD received 47 ears of 41 patients who had previously been treated by medical or surgical therapy middle ear effusion without resolution classified as study group. They were taken conventional medical therapy again 28 ears of 23 patients classified as a control group. ITDs were administered 0.5 ml/4 mg per mm directly in antero-superior quadrant of tympanic membrane. These injections were repeated once a week for 4 weeks. Results were evaluated by using audiometric and tympanometric measurements 1 and 3 months after the treatments. Audiometric measurement shows that 9.91 dB improvement in the mean air-bone gap 15.17 dB in air conduction (AC) pure-tone averages (PTA) and 5.25 dB bone conduction (BC) PTA. But the control group data showed only 2 dB improvement in the mean air-bone gap, 3 dB AC-PTA and 1.36 dB BC-PTA. Tympanometric improvement was found. In 28 ears of patients (59.6%) like type B or C converted to type A in study group without complication but only in three ears (10.7%) of control group. ITD administration to the middle ear is safe and effective for the treatment of otitis media with effusion or chronic eustachian tube dysfunction. No complications like tympanic membrane perforation and/or sensorineural hearing loss have occurred.

Introduction: The aim of the study is to analyze the voice changes occurring during a hemodialysis session objectively and to investigate the statistical correlation between voice changes and ultrafiltration, blood pressure, dry weight and the other variables of the patients. Materials and methods: A total of 169 patients were included in the study. Electronic voice recordings of the patients were performed with the aim of making objective voice analysis before and after dialysis. Fundamental frequency measurements occurring at the level of the larynx (Fo) and harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) were measured from these voice recordings. Results: When the voice recordings obtained from 169 hemodialysis patients before and after dialysis were investigated, it was observed that a significant increase occurred in the Fo (from 164.52 ± 43.36 Hz to 193.19 ± 47.08 Hz, p50.01). When the change in HNR was investigated, a significant reduction was determined in the post-dialysis measurements (4.6 ± 3.23 dB) compared to the pre-dialysis measurements (16.10 ± 4.06 dB, p50.01). Mean 2.49 ± 0.83 L of ultrafiltration was performed and a significant reduction was observed in post-session body weights of the patients (p5 0.01). There was a highly statistical significance between the measurements of post-dialysis Fo and post-dialysis body weights. A highly significant correlation was determined between the amount of ultrafiltration performed and a significant increase observed in Fo before and after dialysis. Also a significant correlation was determined between the reduction in the mean post-session blood pressures and the reduction in the HNRs. Conclusion: Objective voice analysis is suggesting that it can be a simple and applicable method that can be used to determine the dry weight.