ObjectivesTo define the elementary ultrasound (US) lesions in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to evaluate the reliability of the assessment of US lesions according to these definitions in a web-based reliability exercise.MethodsPotential definitions of normal and abnormal US findings of temporal and extracranial large arteries were retrieved by a systematic literature review. As a subsequent step, a structured Delphi exercise was conducted involving an expert panel of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) US Large Vessel Vasculitis Group to agree definitions of normal US appearance and key elementary US lesions of vasculitis of temporal and extracranial large arteries. The reliability of these definitions on normal and abnormal blood vessels was tested on 150 still images and videos in a web-based reliability exercise.ResultsTwenty-four experts participated in both Delphi rounds. From originally 25 statements, nine definitions were obtained for normal appearance, vasculitis and arteriosclerosis of cranial and extracranial vessels. The ‘halo’ and ‘compression’ signs were the key US lesions in GCA. The reliability of the definitions for normal temporal and axillary arteries, the ‘halo’ sign and the ‘compression’ sign was excellent with inter-rater agreements of 91–99% and mean kappa values of 0.83–0.98 for both inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of all 25 experts.ConclusionsThe ‘halo’ and the ‘compression’ signs are regarded as the most important US abnormalities for GCA. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of the new OMERACT definitions for US lesions in GCA was excellent.

No abstract

AimTo monitor joint infl ammation and destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving adalimumab/ methotrexate combination therapy using MRI and ultrasonography. To assess the predictive value of MRI and ultrasonography for erosive progression on CT and compare MRI/ultrasonography/radiography for erosion detection/monitoring. Methods Fifty-two erosive biological-naive RA patients were followed with repeated MRI/ultrasonography/ radiography (0/6/12 months) and clinical/biochemical assessments during adalimumab/methotrexate combination therapy. Results No overall erosion progression or repair was observed at 6 or 12 months (Wilcoxon; p>0.05), but erosion progressors and regressors were observed using the smallest detectable change cut-off. Scores of MRI synovitis, grey-scale synovitis (GSS) and power Doppler ultrasonography decreased after 6 and 12 months (p<0.05), as did DAS28, HAQ and tender and swollen joint counts (p<0.001). Patients with progression on CT had higher baseline MRI bone oedema scores. The RR for CT progression in bones with versus without baseline MRI bone oedema was 3.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 9.3) and timeintegrated MRI bone oedema, power Doppler and GSS scores were higher in bones/joints with CT progression (Mann-Whitney; p<0.05). With CT as the reference method, sensitivities/specifi cities for erosion in metacarpophalangeal joints were 68%/92%, 44%/95% and 26%/98% for MRI, ultrasonography and radiography, respectively. Median intraobserver correlation coeffi cient was 0.95 (range 0.44-0.99). Conclusion During adalimumab/methotrexate combination therapy, no overall erosive progression or repair occurred, whereas repair of individual erosions was documented on MRI, and MRI and ultrasonography synovitis decreased. Infl ammation on MRI and ultrasonography, especially MRI bone oedema, was predictive for erosive progression on CT, at bone/joint level and MRI bone oedema also at patient level.Radiographic data from randomised placebocontrolled studies of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients show that erosive progression is arrested, and occasionally even reversed, when starting methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) antagonist combination therapy. 1 -3 MRI is more sensitive than radiography for bone erosions, including erosive progression, and MRI enables visualisation of synovitis and bone oedema. 4 -7 Diminished size of MRI bone erosions during TNFα antagonist therapy was reported from a study of fi ve RA patients, 8 but no systematic MRI studies addressing the repair of erosions are available.Ultrasonography is also more sensitive for bone erosions than radiography, 5 9 -12 but follow-up data are few. 13 -16 Ultrasonography allows the detection of synovial thickening by grey-scale ultrasonography (B-mode) 5 17 and increased synovial blood fl ow using Doppler techniques. 18 -21 CT is considered a reference method for bone destructions, and is more sensitive for bone erosions than radiography, MRI and ultrasonography. 12 22 No longitudinal RA studies comparing MRI,...

Background The objectives of the present study were, with multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method, to determine the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography for the detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist bones, and to test whether measuring volumes of erosions on CT and MRI is reproducible and correlated to semiquantitative assessments (scores) of erosions on CT, MRI and radiography.