This article is a review towards the communication development theory and practices in Indonesia, to analyze on how the tendencies of the usage of the development model and how it should be. Through the literature study, it illustrates that the participatory development model apparently has not become the main strategy. The linear model through the dissemination of information and innovation diffusion is still the dominant paradigm. The usage of Communication and Information Technology for development, which focuses more on the provision of infrastructure have not yet been supported by the participatory and continuous model of empowerment model. The Communication and InformationTechnology has already become the social transformation paradigm which provides opportunities to increase the development capacity more rapidly and effectively. Based on the paradigm, this analysis offers a convergence of communication development model which is hoped to be able to mobilize all resources collaboratively and optimally.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji wacana tentang pelaporan diskriminasi terhadap Muslim Uyghur di Republika.co.id dan Kompas.com. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan Analisis Wacana Kritis Roger Fowler. Hasilnya menemukan bahwa Republika.co.id lebih cenderung menunjukkan peristiwa di Xinjiang sebagai diskriminasi terkait agama, menggunakan pertarungan wacana. Sementara itu, Kompas.com lebih cenderung menunjukkan peristiwa di Xinjiang sebagai tindakan pelanggaran HAM yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Tiongkok terhadap Uyghur, menggunakan klasifikasi, pembatasan pandangan, dan pertarungan wacana. Nilai-nilai ideologis yang terkandung dalam Republika.co.id menekankan hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan Islam, sementara Kompas.com lebih menekankan pada sisi manusia. Wacana dan nilai-nilai ideologis yang ditampilkan dalam pelaporan diskriminasi terhadap Muslim Uyghur di Republika.co.id dan Kompas.com adalah hasil konstruksi realitas yang dilakukan oleh dua media, di mana proses pembentukan makna melalui bahasa dipengaruhi oleh ideologi. dari Republika.co.id dan Kompas.com digunakan sebagai dasar dalam menyusun dan menyajikan berita. Dalam hal ini, Republika.co.id menyajikan berita berdasarkan ideologi Islam, sedangkan Kompas.com mengandalkan ideologi humanisme.This study aims to examine the discourse on reporting discrimination against Uyghur Muslims on Republika.co.id and Kompas.com. The study employs a qualitative approach and Roger Fowler's Critical Discourse Analysis. The findings show that Republika.co.id is more likely to show events in Xinjiang as discrimination related to religion, using discourse battles. Meanwhile, Kompas. com is more likely to show events in Xinjiang as acts of human rights violations committed by the Chinese government against Uyghurs, using classification, limitation of views, and discourse battles. The ideological values contained in Republika.co.id emphasize matters relating to Islam, while Kompas.com places more emphasis on humanity. The ideological discourse and values displayed in reporting the discrimination against Uyghur Muslims in Republika.co.id and Kompas.com are the results of the constructions of reality carried out by the two media, where the process of forming meanings through language is influenced by the ideologies of Republika.co.id and Kompas.com which are used as a foundation in compiling and presenting news. In this case, Republika.co.id presents news based on Islamic ideology, while Kompas.com relies on the ideology of humanism.
Innovations in the field of information and communication technology have created the variety of information distribution platform to audiences. This is prompted media companies to build and effort to develop system management of news production multiplatform which intended as an effort to keep the media companies alive and growing. By using framework of structuration theory, the pourpose of this study is to reveal the relationship between structure and agency of journalist as actor. The method used is a case study in media companies in South Kalimantan, Banjarmasin Post. The results showed that the duality of structure occurs, which the structure always provides the enabling and the obvious limitations that cause system technology based news production run. In line with the sructure roles, journalists as human actors adjust their competences with management system multiplatform. The system running by the developing of individual basic competences include discursive and practical consciousness, cognitive motivation and soft competences of online media namely attitude of speedy and multi-tasking working and having the work orientation of social networking.
Pembahasan digitalisasi bidang penyiaran sebagai pengganti Undang-Undang 32/2002 dilakukan sejak DPR periode 2009-2014 dan 2014-2019. Pembahasan RUU Penyiaran periode tersebut merupakan pembahasan yang sarat kepentingan dan menghabiskan waktu sekitar 10 tahun. Pertanyaan penelitian yang disajikan ialah bagaimana dualitas struktur dan agen dalam penyusunan RUU Penyiaran tersebut yang berangkat dari teori strukturasi Giddens bahwa kepentingan tersebut merupakan gejala sosial yang dapat diurai dan dieksplor apakah kekuatan-kekuatan individu atau kekuatan kelompok dapat membentuk masyarakat, apakah kekuatan individu-individu atau kekuatan kelompok tersebut dapat merubah perubahan sosial, sehingga didapatkan deskripsi jawaban pada penelitian ini. Melalui penelitian studi kasus kualitatif digambarkan kepentingan periode DPR tersebut, sehingga didapatkan perspektif antara LPS, DPR, dan Pemerintah siapa pihak penyelenggara multiplexing. Dengan demikian DPR segera mensahkan RUU tersebut sehingga digitalisasi penyiaran bisa terwujud.
Various researchers and experts have found that even from the colonial era, the Netherlands have displayed negative Chinese stereotypes through various literary works which show that the Chinese are greedy, like to cheat and steal. At that time, there were also around 57% of Chinese immigrants who worked as a merchant in Indonesia, hence they played a major role in the development of the Indonesian economy. Since then, stereotyping of Chinese ethnicity has been a social reality in Indonesian society, where stereotype means an assessment of someone who is only based on the perception of the group in which the person can be categorized. Nevertheless, Stand Up Comedy Indonesia commodified the stereotype in a form of humour. Using critical discourse analysis Teun A Van Dijk, this article will unveil every text that contains Chinese stereotype and has been commodified in Stand Up Comedy Indonesia. This research found that the humour of Stand Up Comedy Indonesia which has the purpose of "Let's Make Laugh" is now no longer purely just to entertain the public, but there is a new focus on how to change the use value of humour into exchange value, in other words there is a commodification of Chinese stereotypical humour.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.