This is the first study to evaluate nesfatin-1 levels in relation with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in obese patients who had significantly lower nesfatin-1 levels. Our results underline that nesfatin-1 may play an important role in regulation of food intake in obese individuals.

Background The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the analytical performance characteristics of the two creatinine methods based on the Jaffe and enzymatic methods. Methods Two original creatinine methods, Jaffe and enzymatic, were evaluated on Architect c16000 automated analyzer via limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ), linearity, intra‐assay and inter‐assay precision, and comparability in serum and urine samples. The method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples according to CLSI guideline were performed on 230 serum and 141 urine samples by analyzing on the same auto‐analyzer. Results The LODs were determined as 0.1 mg/dL for both serum methods and as 0.25 and 0.07 mg/dL for the Jaffe and the enzymatic urine method respectively. The LOQs were similar with 0.05 mg/dL value for both serum methods, and enzymatic urine method had a lower LOQ than Jaffe urine method, values at 0.5 and 2 mg/dL respectively. Both methods were linear up to 65 mg/dL for serum and 260 mg/dL for urine. The intra‐assay and inter‐assay precision data were under desirable levels in both methods. The higher correlations were determined between two methods in serum and urine (r=.9994, r=.9998 respectively). On the other hand, Jaffe method gave the higher creatinine results than enzymatic method, especially at the low concentrations in both serum and urine. Conclusions Both Jaffe and enzymatic methods were found to meet the analytical performance requirements in routine use. However, enzymatic method was found to have better performance in low creatinine levels.

Serum adropin levels are significantly decreased in PCOS and are inversely associated with TNF-α. Further dissection of the nature of this association can open new therapeutic options for metabolic diseases.

This is the first clinical study evaluating the relation of serum omentin 1 levels with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in obese children with a particular interest to identify the possible role of omentin 1 in childhood obesity and related metabolic disturbances.The study included obese children with a body mass index (BMI)>95th percentile and healthy children with a BMI<85th percentile. The healthy and obese subjects had similar age and gender distribution. Glucose, insulin, lipid profile, and omentin 1 levels were measured to evaluate the metabolic parameters.49 obese children who applied to our department with complaint of weight gain and 30 healthy age and sex matched subjects were enrolled. In obese children BMI, body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mid-arm circumference (MAC), triceps skin fold (TSF), waist circumference (WC), homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum insulin, and triglyceride levels were higher whereas omentin-1 levels were lower than control subjects (p<0.05). In the obese group, omentin 1 level was negatively correlated with BMI, insulin, HOMA-IR, and WC, while no significant correlation was observed with other parameters (p>0.05). Additionally, although statistically insignificant, patients with IR (n=31) had lower omentin-1 levels compared to obese children without IR (n=18).Our data indicates that serum omentin 1 levels are i) lower in obese children and ii) negatively correlated with BMI, WC, HOMA-IR and insulin levels suggesting that omentin 1 might be a biomarker for metabolic dysfunction also in childhood and adolescence. Lower omentin 1 levels tended to be associated with insulin resistance however this association failed to reach statistical significance. Further studies in larger populations are needed to better-define the relation of omentin 1 and insulin resistance in obese children.

Objective:To investigate the relationship between zonulin levels and clinical and laboratory parameters of childhood obesity.Methods:The study included obese children with a body mass index (BMI) >95th percentile and healthy children who were of similar age and gender distribution. Clinical (BMI, waist circumferences, mid-arm circumference, triceps skinfold, percentage of body fat, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) and biochemical (glucose, insulin, lipid levels, thyroid function tests, cortisol, zonulin and leptin levels) parameters were measured.Results:A total of 43 obese subjects (23 males, mean age: 11.1±3.1 years) and 37 healthy subjects (18 males, mean age: 11.5±3.5 years) were included in this study. Obese children had significantly higher insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), zonulin and leptin levels than healthy children (p<0.05), while glucose levels were not different (p>0.05). Comparison of the obese children with and without insulin resistance showed no statistically significant differences for zonulin levels (p>0.05). Zonulin levels were found to negatively correlate with HDL-C and positively correlate with leptin levels, after adjusting for age and BMI.Conclusion:To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the relationship between circulating zonulin level (as a marker of intestinal permeability) and insulin resistance and leptin (as markers of metabolic disturbances associated with obesity) in childhood obesity. The results showed that zonulin was significantly higher in obese children when compared to healthy children, a finding indicating a potential role of zonulin in the etiopathogenesis of obesity and related disturbances.