The administration of magnesium led to a significant reduction in the requirements for anaesthetic drugs during total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol, remifentanil and vecuronium.

Purpose Neer type II distal clavicle fractures are associated with a high rate of non-union or malunion due to impaired coracoclavicular ligament stability. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically assisted indirect osteosynthesis for type II distal clavicle fractures using a cortical suture button device. Methods Seventeen patients Neer type II fractures of the distal clavicle were treated surgically using cortical suture button ixation between 2012 and 2017. The clinical and radiological results were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant-Murley score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Results Anatomic reduction and bone healing were achieved in all patients at the inal follow-up. The median age of the patients was 31 years (range 19-57). The mean follow-up was 25.9 months (range 14-64). The average delay before surgery was 2 days (range 1-4). At the inal follow-up, the mean ASES, Constant-Murley score and VAS score were 92.6 ± 3.2 (range 84.9-96.6), 96.2 ± 2.4 (range 92-100) and 0.47 ± 0.51 (range 0-1), respectively. All patients were able to resume work as well as sport activities. The postoperative complications included two coracoid process fractures, and none of the patients required additional surgery related to the index procedure. Conclusion All arthroscopic coracoclavicular button ixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures would provide suicient stability and union with satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. This arthroscopic ixation technique would be more eicient than other osteosynthesis methods because it is a minimally invasive surgery with a low complication rate. Level of evidence III.

This study explored the radiological, functional, and cosmetic results of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures with open reduction and percutaneous pinning, comparing posterior triceps V-splitting (group I, n=22) and lateral (group II, n=25) approaches. The time to union, the functional and cosmetic results, and the flexor and extensor muscle strengths were measured and compared with the contralateral extremities. There were no statistical differences between the groups. The V-splitting posterior approach is as safe and effective as the lateral approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Hip nailing is frequently used to treat unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (ITF) in elderly patients. In this retrospective study, we compared the functional and radiological results, and the complications, of patients treated using proximal femoral nails (PFN) with an integrated, interlocking, compression lag screw, or two separate lag screws, which allow linear compression at the fracture site.

Objectives This study aims to compare the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament (ALL) suture tape augmentation (STA) and ACL reconstruction after a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients and methods This retrospective study included 63 patients (36 males, 27 females; mean age 27.8±4.0; range, 19 to 35 years) who had unilateral ACL injury and participated in pivoting sports and were randomly assigned to undergo either isolated ACL reconstruction (Group 1, n=33) or combined ACL reconstruction and ALL STA (Group 2, n=30) between January 2015 and February 2018. The presence of an associated meniscal injury, chondral pathology, contralateral ACL rupture, and residual pivot shift; subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee scores; Cincinnati and Lysholm functional scores; KT-1000 measurements; and graft rupture rate were evaluated. Results Patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, side, time from injury to surgery, postoperative follow-up time, ACL graft size, contralateral ACL rupture, graft size, partial meniscectomy, chondral pathology or preoperative physical examination results. A total of 9.1% of the patients in Group 1 and 0% of those in Group 2 presented postoperative positive pivot shift (p=0.357). The graft failure rate was 6.06% (n=2) in Group 1 and 0% in Group 2 (p=0.270). In the final evaluation, compared with Group 1, Group 2 showed better anteroposterior clinical stability, as evaluated by KT-1000 arthrometry (p=0.006). Although better results were observed in Group 2, the clinical evaluation results for postoperative function did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Combined ALL STA and ACL reconstruction was found to be effective in improving subjective and objective outcomes. Nevertheless, these findings were not significantly superior to those of isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts, except for the side-to-side differential anterior laxity testing results.

No abstract

Background It has been suggested that spinal manipulation may alter sensorimotor integration in the central nervous system and therefore may be used to treat central sensitization syndromes. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in addition to pharmacological treatment in patients with fibromyalgia. Design A single‐center, randomized, and placebo‐controlled trial with three parallel arms Setting Outpatient clinics at a tertiary health care facility. Participants Female patients aged 18‐55 years receiving pharmacological treatment. Interventions Spinal manipulation, sham manipulation, and control groups. Patients in the spinal manipulation group received high‐velocity low‐amplitude manipulation treatment twice a week for 3 weeks. Patients in the sham group received an application that was very similar to the active treatment but was not expected to have any real therapeutic effect. Patients in the control group continued to receive pharmacological therapy. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome, pain score (visual analog scale), and secondary outcomes, pressure pain threshold (PPT), Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), Widespread Pain Index (WPI), and Fibromyalgia Severity Score (FSS) were measured before, 1 month, and 3 months after randomization. Results Sixty patients with a mean age of 41.7 years (SD = 8.0) were enrolled in the study. A mixed‐design repeated analysis of covariance was used to test the data. At 1 month after randomization, pain scores did not differ between groups. At 3 months after randomization, the spinal manipulation group had a significantly lower pain score (adjusted mean = 4.3 cm, SE: 0.4) than the control group (adjusted mean = 6.8 cm, SE: 0.4) and the sham manipulation group (adjusted mean = 5.7 cm, SE: 0.4). PPT did not differ between groups at any time point. FIQR, WPI, and FSS showed some improvement 1 or 3 months after randomization in favor of the spinal manipulation group. Conclusions Spinal manipulation used in addition to pharmacological treatment in young/middle‐aged female patients with fibromyalgia could be an effective treatment for pain, disease severity, and functionality.

CEA values were significantly lower (p = 0.009) and AA values were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in our study group than the previously-reported average values of the Turkish population. We think that acetabular dysplasia is more frequent in patients with hyperlaxity; further studies are needed to test this idea.