A potential link between GABRD encoding the δ subunit of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors and neurodevelopmental disorders has largely been disregarded due to conflicting conclusions from early studies. However, we identified seven heterozygous missense GABRD variants in 10 patients with neurodevelopmental disorders and generalized epilepsy. One variant occurred in two sibs of healthy parents with presumed somatic mosaicism, another segregated with the disease in three affected family members, and the remaining five occurred de novo in sporadic patients. Electrophysiological measurements were used to determine the functional consequence of the seven missense δ subunit variants in receptor combinations of α1β3δ and α4β2δ GABAA receptors. This was accompanied by analysis of electro-clinical phenotypes of the affected individuals. We determined that five of the seven variants caused altered function of the resulting α1β3δ and α4β2δ GABAA receptors. Surprisingly, four of the five variants led to gain-of-function effects whereas one led to a loss-of-function effect. The stark differences between the gain-of-function and loss-of function effects were mirrored by the clinical phenotypes. Six patients with gain-of-function variants shared common phenotypes: neurodevelopmental disorders with generalized epilepsy, behavioral issues, and various degrees of intellectual disability. Six patients with gain-of-function variants shared common phenotypes: neurodevelopmental disorders with behavioral issues, various degrees of intellectual disability, generalized epilepsy with atypical absences and generalized myoclonic and/or bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. The EEG showed qualitative analogies among the different gain-of-function variant carriers consisting of focal slowing in the occipital regions often preceding irregular generalized epileptiform discharges, with frontal predominance. In contrast, the one patient carrying a loss-of-function variant had normal intelligence, no seizure history but has a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and suffering from elevated internalizing psychiatric symptoms. We hypothesize that increase in tonic GABA-evoked current levels mediated by δ-containing extrasynaptic GABAA receptors lead to abnormal neurotransmission, which represent a novel mechanism for severe neurodevelopmental disorders. In support of this, the electro-clinical findings for the gain-of-function GABRD variants resemble the phenotypic spectrum reported in patients with missense SLC6A1 (GABA uptake transporter) variants. This also indicates that the phenomenon of extrasynaptic receptor over-activity is observed in a broader range of patients with neurodevelopmental disorders, since SLC6A1 loss-of-function variants also lead to overactive extrasynaptic δ-containing GABAA receptors. These findings have implications when selecting potential treatment options, since a substantial portion of available anti-seizure medication act by enhancing GABAergic function either directly or indirectly, which could exacerbate symptoms in patients with gain-of-function GABRD variants.
TARS2 encodes human mitochondrial threonyl tRNA-synthetase that is responsible for generating mitochondrial Thr-tRNAThr and clearing mischarged Ser-tRNAThr during mitochondrial translation. Pathogenic variants in TARS2 have hitherto been reported in a pair of siblings and an unrelated patient with an early onset mitochondrial encephalomyopathy and a combined respiratory chain enzyme deficiency in muscle. We here report five additional unrelated patients with TARS2-related mitochondrial diseases, expanding the clinical phenotype to also include epilepsy, dystonia, hyperhidrosis and severe hearing impairment. Additionally, we document seven novel TARS2 variants—one nonsense variant and six missense variants—that we demonstrate are pathogenic and causal of the disease presentation based on population frequency, homology modelling and functional studies that show the effects of the pathogenic variants on TARS2 stability and/or function.
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate choices of and reasoning behind chorionic villous sampling and opinions on non‐invasive prenatal testing among women and men achieving pregnancy following preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for hereditary disorders. Methods A questionnaire was electronically submitted to patients who had achieved a clinical pregnancy following PGT at the Center for Preimplantation Genetic Testing, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, between 2017 and 2020. Results Chorionic villous sampling was declined by approximately half of the patients. The primary reason for declining was the perceived risk of miscarriage due to the procedure. Nine out of 10 patients responded that they would have opted for a non‐invasive prenatal test if it had been offered. Some patients were not aware that the nuchal translucency scan offered to all pregnant women in the early second trimester only rarely provides information on the hereditary disorder for which PGT was performed. Conclusion Improved counseling on the array of prenatal tests and screenings available might be required to assist patients in making better informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. Non‐invasive prenatal testing is welcomed by the patients and will likely increase the number of patients opting for confirmatory prenatal testing following PGT for hereditary disorders.
Introduction:In assisted reproductive technology, aneuploidy is considered a primary cause of failed embryo implantation. This has led to the implementation of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in some clinics. The prevalence of aneuploidy and the use of aneuploidy screening during preimplantation genetic testing for inherited disorders has not previously been reviewed. Here, we systematically review the literature to investigate the prevalence of aneuploidy in blastocysts derived from patients carrying or affected by an inherited disorder, and whether screening for aneuploidy improves clinical outcomes. Material and methods:PubMed and Embase were searched for articles describing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and/or structural rearrangements in combination with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Original articles reporting aneuploidy rates at the blastocyst stage and/or clinical outcomes (positive human chorionic gonadotropin, gestational sacs/implantation rate, fetal heartbeat/clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth/delivery rate on a per transfer basis) were included. Case studies were excluded. Results:Of the 26 identified studies, none were randomized controlled trials, three were historical cohort studies with a reference group not receiving aneuploidy screening, and the remaining were case series. In weighted analysis, 34.1% of 7749 blastocysts were aneuploid. Screening for aneuploidy reduced the proportion of embryos suitable for transfer, thereby increasing the risk of experiencing a cycle without transferable embryos. In pooled analysis the percentage of embryos suitable for transfer was reduced from 57.5% to 37.2% following screening for aneuploidy. Among historical cohort studies, one reported significantly improved pregnancy and birth rates but did | 697 TOFT eT al. K E Y W O R D Saneuploidy screening, clinical outcomes, comprehensive chromosome screening, preimplantation genetic diagnosis-preimplantation screening, preimplantation genetic testing, systematic review Key messageOne-third of embryos derived from patients carrying or affected by an inherited disorder are aneuploid. Hence, prioritizing embryos by ploidy status should in theory improve clinical success rates per transfer. The design and quality of the current available data do not allow a conclusion to be drawn with respect to a clinical effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.